Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases

Edward Chow, Jennifer James, Andrea Barsevick, William Hartsell, Sarah Ratcliffe, Charles Scarantino, Robert Ivker, John Suh, Ivy A Petersen, Andre Konski, William Demas, Deborah Bruner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. Methods: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. Results: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97% of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. Conclusion: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-253
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pain Management
Volume3
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis
Bone and Bones
Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Radiation
Breast Neoplasms
Aptitude
Therapeutics
Walking
Sleep
Population
Datasets

Keywords

  • Bone metastases
  • Functional interference clusters
  • Palliative radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Chow, E., James, J., Barsevick, A., Hartsell, W., Ratcliffe, S., Scarantino, C., ... Bruner, D. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases. Journal of Pain Management, 3(3), 247-253.

Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases. / Chow, Edward; James, Jennifer; Barsevick, Andrea; Hartsell, William; Ratcliffe, Sarah; Scarantino, Charles; Ivker, Robert; Suh, John; Petersen, Ivy A; Konski, Andre; Demas, William; Bruner, Deborah.

In: Journal of Pain Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2010, p. 247-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chow, E, James, J, Barsevick, A, Hartsell, W, Ratcliffe, S, Scarantino, C, Ivker, R, Suh, J, Petersen, IA, Konski, A, Demas, W & Bruner, D 2010, 'Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases', Journal of Pain Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 247-253.
Chow, Edward ; James, Jennifer ; Barsevick, Andrea ; Hartsell, William ; Ratcliffe, Sarah ; Scarantino, Charles ; Ivker, Robert ; Suh, John ; Petersen, Ivy A ; Konski, Andre ; Demas, William ; Bruner, Deborah. / Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases. In: Journal of Pain Management. 2010 ; Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 247-253.
@article{c504635e0e064eeb8a29ddccfd0c8d06,
title = "Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases",
abstract = "To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. Methods: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. Results: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97{\%} of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. Conclusion: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.",
keywords = "Bone metastases, Functional interference clusters, Palliative radiotherapy",
author = "Edward Chow and Jennifer James and Andrea Barsevick and William Hartsell and Sarah Ratcliffe and Charles Scarantino and Robert Ivker and John Suh and Petersen, {Ivy A} and Andre Konski and William Demas and Deborah Bruner",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "247--253",
journal = "Journal of Pain Management",
issn = "1939-5914",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confirmatory factor analysis of brief pain inventory (BPI) functional interference clusters in patients with bone metastases

AU - Chow, Edward

AU - James, Jennifer

AU - Barsevick, Andrea

AU - Hartsell, William

AU - Ratcliffe, Sarah

AU - Scarantino, Charles

AU - Ivker, Robert

AU - Suh, John

AU - Petersen, Ivy A

AU - Konski, Andre

AU - Demas, William

AU - Bruner, Deborah

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. Methods: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. Results: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97% of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. Conclusion: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.

AB - To determine which of the previously proposed functional interference cluster models is most appropriate in patients with bone metastases and to determine if the cluster structures identified at baseline differed between responders and non-responders following palliative radiotherapy. Methods: The confirmatory test data set consists of breast and prostate cancer patients treated with palliative radiotherapy between May 2003 to January 2007. Worst pain and functional interference scores were assessed using Brief Pain Inventory at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post radiation treatment. The baseline cluster structure of the confirmatory dataset was compared to each of the previously proposed baseline cluster models. Maximum likelihood CFA was used to account for possible correlation amongst the factor components. A MIMIC model was used to determine the invariance of the cluster models between responders and non-responders during follow-up. Results: A total of 169 eligible patients were analysed. There were 91 male and 78 female patients with a median age of 68 years. The median KPS was 70. A single 8 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions were used in 97% of all analysed patients. The RTOG model, in which relationships with others and sleep comprised the mood-related interference cluster and walking ability and normal work comprised the physical-interference cluster, provides the best fit for the sample data. The follow-up cluster structure is not similar across the responder groups indicating that cluster structures shift following radiation treatment, as evidenced by pain response. Conclusion: Although differing slightly this analysis confirms pretreatment symptom clusters exist for patients with bone metastases from breast or prostate cancer based on the RTOG 9714 data. This could help formulate symptom management interventions at initial diagnosis. Symptom clusters dissolve or change after treatment which may be a function of the treatment or population and requires further study.

KW - Bone metastases

KW - Functional interference clusters

KW - Palliative radiotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953190794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953190794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79953190794

VL - 3

SP - 247

EP - 253

JO - Journal of Pain Management

JF - Journal of Pain Management

SN - 1939-5914

IS - 3

ER -