Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation

Lori A. Blauwet, Joseph F. Malouf, Heidi M. Connolly, David O. Hodge, Katie N. Evans, Regina M. Herges, Thoralf M. Sundt, Fletcher A Jr. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Normal Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for mitral valve bioprostheses are limited. Methods: To establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 types of bioprostheses examined, we conducted a comprehensive, retrospective, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 179 patients who underwent implantation of the Medtronic Hancock II or the Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valve bioprosthesis or the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valve bioprosthesis. Results: All bioprostheses were normal by clinical examination, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Regardless of valve type and body surface area, the pressure half-time was < 124 ms in all patients. Mean gradient < 9.5 mm Hg, mitral E velocity < 2.6 m/s, mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral < 69 cm, and ratio of the mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral to the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral < 3.4 were recorded in nearly all patients. Conclusion: These cutoff values (mean + 2 standard deviation) are specific, but not sensitive, for identifying mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Prostheses with hemodynamic values that are higher than these cutoff values are likely dysfunctional, but in select cases, mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are lower than these thresholds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-666
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Bioprosthesis
Mitral Valve
Prostheses and Implants
Hemodynamics
Body Surface Area
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Echocardiography
Swine
Pressure

Keywords

  • Doppler
  • Echocardiography
  • Mitral
  • Prosthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation. / Blauwet, Lori A.; Malouf, Joseph F.; Connolly, Heidi M.; Hodge, David O.; Evans, Katie N.; Herges, Regina M.; Sundt, Thoralf M.; Miller, Fletcher A Jr.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 23, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 656-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blauwet, Lori A. ; Malouf, Joseph F. ; Connolly, Heidi M. ; Hodge, David O. ; Evans, Katie N. ; Herges, Regina M. ; Sundt, Thoralf M. ; Miller, Fletcher A Jr. / Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation. In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010 ; Vol. 23, No. 6. pp. 656-666.
@article{3c2a48ec75804cc7a4d35437d8af60c8,
title = "Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation",
abstract = "Background: Normal Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for mitral valve bioprostheses are limited. Methods: To establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 types of bioprostheses examined, we conducted a comprehensive, retrospective, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 179 patients who underwent implantation of the Medtronic Hancock II or the Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valve bioprosthesis or the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valve bioprosthesis. Results: All bioprostheses were normal by clinical examination, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Regardless of valve type and body surface area, the pressure half-time was < 124 ms in all patients. Mean gradient < 9.5 mm Hg, mitral E velocity < 2.6 m/s, mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral < 69 cm, and ratio of the mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral to the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral < 3.4 were recorded in nearly all patients. Conclusion: These cutoff values (mean + 2 standard deviation) are specific, but not sensitive, for identifying mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Prostheses with hemodynamic values that are higher than these cutoff values are likely dysfunctional, but in select cases, mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are lower than these thresholds.",
keywords = "Doppler, Echocardiography, Mitral, Prosthesis",
author = "Blauwet, {Lori A.} and Malouf, {Joseph F.} and Connolly, {Heidi M.} and Hodge, {David O.} and Evans, {Katie N.} and Herges, {Regina M.} and Sundt, {Thoralf M.} and Miller, {Fletcher A Jr.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "656--666",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Bioprostheses Early after Implantation

AU - Blauwet, Lori A.

AU - Malouf, Joseph F.

AU - Connolly, Heidi M.

AU - Hodge, David O.

AU - Evans, Katie N.

AU - Herges, Regina M.

AU - Sundt, Thoralf M.

AU - Miller, Fletcher A Jr.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Background: Normal Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for mitral valve bioprostheses are limited. Methods: To establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 types of bioprostheses examined, we conducted a comprehensive, retrospective, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 179 patients who underwent implantation of the Medtronic Hancock II or the Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valve bioprosthesis or the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valve bioprosthesis. Results: All bioprostheses were normal by clinical examination, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Regardless of valve type and body surface area, the pressure half-time was < 124 ms in all patients. Mean gradient < 9.5 mm Hg, mitral E velocity < 2.6 m/s, mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral < 69 cm, and ratio of the mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral to the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral < 3.4 were recorded in nearly all patients. Conclusion: These cutoff values (mean + 2 standard deviation) are specific, but not sensitive, for identifying mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Prostheses with hemodynamic values that are higher than these cutoff values are likely dysfunctional, but in select cases, mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are lower than these thresholds.

AB - Background: Normal Doppler-derived hemodynamic data for mitral valve bioprostheses are limited. Methods: To establish parameters for identifying normal function for each of the 3 types of bioprostheses examined, we conducted a comprehensive, retrospective, two-dimensional, and Doppler echocardiographic assessment of 179 patients who underwent implantation of the Medtronic Hancock II or the Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) porcine mitral valve bioprosthesis or the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) bovine pericardial mitral valve bioprosthesis. Results: All bioprostheses were normal by clinical examination, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography. Regardless of valve type and body surface area, the pressure half-time was < 124 ms in all patients. Mean gradient < 9.5 mm Hg, mitral E velocity < 2.6 m/s, mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral < 69 cm, and ratio of the mitral valve prosthesis time-velocity integral to the left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral < 3.4 were recorded in nearly all patients. Conclusion: These cutoff values (mean + 2 standard deviation) are specific, but not sensitive, for identifying mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction. Prostheses with hemodynamic values that are higher than these cutoff values are likely dysfunctional, but in select cases, mitral valve prosthesis dysfunction may be present even when hemodynamic values are lower than these thresholds.

KW - Doppler

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Mitral

KW - Prosthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952640486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952640486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.031

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 20497863

AN - SCOPUS:77952640486

VL - 23

SP - 656

EP - 666

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 6

ER -