Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation

Yoram M. Neuman, Andrea V. Brasch, Sergio Kobal, Steven S. Khan, James M. Mirocha, Tasneem Zehra Naqvi, Robert J. Siegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We examined the agreement between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperative prepump transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the assessment of left-sided regurgitant lesions and echocardiographic variables associated with grading discrepancies. Methods: The TTE and prepump TEE studies of 54 patients undergoing aortic-valve replacement for aortic stenosis were reviewed. Agreement and correlation in assessment of aortic (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between mean TTE and prepump TEE grading of MR (0.23 ± 0.19 vs. 0.21 ± 0.15 jet area/area of the left atrium, p = 0.49), but the correlation between the two methods was weak (r = 0.40, p = 0.003), with an exact agreement of 54%. Prepump TEE tended to grade AR as more severe (mean grade 1.43 ± 0.94 vs. 1.24 ± 0.75, p = 0.058). The correlation between the two methods in AR assessment was fair (r = 0.70, p = 0.0001) with an agreement of 59%. For MR and AR grading, no significant correlations between valvular regurgitation severity and blood pressure differences between preoperative TTE and prepump TEE were found. In 17% of cases, discrepancies in identifying severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation could have affected patient management. Conclusions: There is modest agreement in MR and AR assessment between TTE and prepump TEE. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthesiologists must be aware of differences between these methods when using prepump TEE to guide intraoperative decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-152
Number of pages8
JournalCardiology
Volume99
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Color
Echocardiography
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Heart Atria
Aortic Valve
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • Aortic regurgitation
  • Mitral regurgitation
  • Transesophageal echocardiography
  • Transthoracic echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation. / Neuman, Yoram M.; Brasch, Andrea V.; Kobal, Sergio; Khan, Steven S.; Mirocha, James M.; Naqvi, Tasneem Zehra; Siegel, Robert J.

In: Cardiology, Vol. 99, No. 3, 2003, p. 145-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neuman, Yoram M. ; Brasch, Andrea V. ; Kobal, Sergio ; Khan, Steven S. ; Mirocha, James M. ; Naqvi, Tasneem Zehra ; Siegel, Robert J. / Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation. In: Cardiology. 2003 ; Vol. 99, No. 3. pp. 145-152.
@article{07660b293ebb46abb177525b0110c38a,
title = "Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation",
abstract = "Background: We examined the agreement between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperative prepump transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the assessment of left-sided regurgitant lesions and echocardiographic variables associated with grading discrepancies. Methods: The TTE and prepump TEE studies of 54 patients undergoing aortic-valve replacement for aortic stenosis were reviewed. Agreement and correlation in assessment of aortic (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between mean TTE and prepump TEE grading of MR (0.23 ± 0.19 vs. 0.21 ± 0.15 jet area/area of the left atrium, p = 0.49), but the correlation between the two methods was weak (r = 0.40, p = 0.003), with an exact agreement of 54{\%}. Prepump TEE tended to grade AR as more severe (mean grade 1.43 ± 0.94 vs. 1.24 ± 0.75, p = 0.058). The correlation between the two methods in AR assessment was fair (r = 0.70, p = 0.0001) with an agreement of 59{\%}. For MR and AR grading, no significant correlations between valvular regurgitation severity and blood pressure differences between preoperative TTE and prepump TEE were found. In 17{\%} of cases, discrepancies in identifying severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation could have affected patient management. Conclusions: There is modest agreement in MR and AR assessment between TTE and prepump TEE. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthesiologists must be aware of differences between these methods when using prepump TEE to guide intraoperative decisions.",
keywords = "Aortic regurgitation, Mitral regurgitation, Transesophageal echocardiography, Transthoracic echocardiography",
author = "Neuman, {Yoram M.} and Brasch, {Andrea V.} and Sergio Kobal and Khan, {Steven S.} and Mirocha, {James M.} and Naqvi, {Tasneem Zehra} and Siegel, {Robert J.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1159/000070671",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "145--152",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine",
issn = "1558-2027",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of transthoracic and intraoperative transesophageal color flow doppler assessment of mitral and aortic regurgitation

AU - Neuman, Yoram M.

AU - Brasch, Andrea V.

AU - Kobal, Sergio

AU - Khan, Steven S.

AU - Mirocha, James M.

AU - Naqvi, Tasneem Zehra

AU - Siegel, Robert J.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: We examined the agreement between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperative prepump transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the assessment of left-sided regurgitant lesions and echocardiographic variables associated with grading discrepancies. Methods: The TTE and prepump TEE studies of 54 patients undergoing aortic-valve replacement for aortic stenosis were reviewed. Agreement and correlation in assessment of aortic (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between mean TTE and prepump TEE grading of MR (0.23 ± 0.19 vs. 0.21 ± 0.15 jet area/area of the left atrium, p = 0.49), but the correlation between the two methods was weak (r = 0.40, p = 0.003), with an exact agreement of 54%. Prepump TEE tended to grade AR as more severe (mean grade 1.43 ± 0.94 vs. 1.24 ± 0.75, p = 0.058). The correlation between the two methods in AR assessment was fair (r = 0.70, p = 0.0001) with an agreement of 59%. For MR and AR grading, no significant correlations between valvular regurgitation severity and blood pressure differences between preoperative TTE and prepump TEE were found. In 17% of cases, discrepancies in identifying severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation could have affected patient management. Conclusions: There is modest agreement in MR and AR assessment between TTE and prepump TEE. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthesiologists must be aware of differences between these methods when using prepump TEE to guide intraoperative decisions.

AB - Background: We examined the agreement between transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperative prepump transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the assessment of left-sided regurgitant lesions and echocardiographic variables associated with grading discrepancies. Methods: The TTE and prepump TEE studies of 54 patients undergoing aortic-valve replacement for aortic stenosis were reviewed. Agreement and correlation in assessment of aortic (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference between mean TTE and prepump TEE grading of MR (0.23 ± 0.19 vs. 0.21 ± 0.15 jet area/area of the left atrium, p = 0.49), but the correlation between the two methods was weak (r = 0.40, p = 0.003), with an exact agreement of 54%. Prepump TEE tended to grade AR as more severe (mean grade 1.43 ± 0.94 vs. 1.24 ± 0.75, p = 0.058). The correlation between the two methods in AR assessment was fair (r = 0.70, p = 0.0001) with an agreement of 59%. For MR and AR grading, no significant correlations between valvular regurgitation severity and blood pressure differences between preoperative TTE and prepump TEE were found. In 17% of cases, discrepancies in identifying severe mitral or aortic valve regurgitation could have affected patient management. Conclusions: There is modest agreement in MR and AR assessment between TTE and prepump TEE. Cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthesiologists must be aware of differences between these methods when using prepump TEE to guide intraoperative decisions.

KW - Aortic regurgitation

KW - Mitral regurgitation

KW - Transesophageal echocardiography

KW - Transthoracic echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038646405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038646405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000070671

DO - 10.1159/000070671

M3 - Article

C2 - 12824722

AN - SCOPUS:0038646405

VL - 99

SP - 145

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

SN - 1558-2027

IS - 3

ER -