Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft: A biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model

T. Hashimoto, A. R. Thoreson, K. N. An, Peter C Amadio, Chunfeng D Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of joining tendons of similar and dissimilar sizes between recipient and donor tendons for flexor tendon grafts. Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and peroneus longus (PL) canine tendons were harvested and divided into four groups. The repair technique we compared was a step-cut (SC) suture and a Pulvertaft weave (PW). FDP tendons were significantly larger in diameter than PL tendons (p < 0.05). The volume of the SC repairs using either FDP or PL tendon as a graft was significantly smaller than PW repairs (p < 0.05). The ultimate load to failure and repair stiffness in FDP graft tendons significantly increased compared with the PL graft tendons (p < 0.05). The SC suture can be used as an alternative to the PW, with similar strength and less bulk for repairs using graft tendons of similar diameter. Surgeons should be aware of the effect of graft tendon size and repair method on strength and bulk when performing flexor tendon grafts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)848-854
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
Volume37
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Biomechanical Phenomena
Tendons
Canidae
Transplants
Sutures
In Vitro Techniques
Tissue Donors

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • Flexor tendon
  • graft
  • repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft : A biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model. / Hashimoto, T.; Thoreson, A. R.; An, K. N.; Amadio, Peter C; Zhao, Chunfeng D.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume, Vol. 37, No. 9, 11.2012, p. 848-854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d177299f836549e9943bbfe58c41bac2,
title = "Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft: A biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of joining tendons of similar and dissimilar sizes between recipient and donor tendons for flexor tendon grafts. Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and peroneus longus (PL) canine tendons were harvested and divided into four groups. The repair technique we compared was a step-cut (SC) suture and a Pulvertaft weave (PW). FDP tendons were significantly larger in diameter than PL tendons (p < 0.05). The volume of the SC repairs using either FDP or PL tendon as a graft was significantly smaller than PW repairs (p < 0.05). The ultimate load to failure and repair stiffness in FDP graft tendons significantly increased compared with the PL graft tendons (p < 0.05). The SC suture can be used as an alternative to the PW, with similar strength and less bulk for repairs using graft tendons of similar diameter. Surgeons should be aware of the effect of graft tendon size and repair method on strength and bulk when performing flexor tendon grafts.",
keywords = "biomechanics, Flexor tendon, graft, repair",
author = "T. Hashimoto and Thoreson, {A. R.} and An, {K. N.} and Amadio, {Peter C} and Zhao, {Chunfeng D}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/1753193412442460",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "848--854",
journal = "Hand",
issn = "1558-9447",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft

T2 - A biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model

AU - Hashimoto, T.

AU - Thoreson, A. R.

AU - An, K. N.

AU - Amadio, Peter C

AU - Zhao, Chunfeng D

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of joining tendons of similar and dissimilar sizes between recipient and donor tendons for flexor tendon grafts. Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and peroneus longus (PL) canine tendons were harvested and divided into four groups. The repair technique we compared was a step-cut (SC) suture and a Pulvertaft weave (PW). FDP tendons were significantly larger in diameter than PL tendons (p < 0.05). The volume of the SC repairs using either FDP or PL tendon as a graft was significantly smaller than PW repairs (p < 0.05). The ultimate load to failure and repair stiffness in FDP graft tendons significantly increased compared with the PL graft tendons (p < 0.05). The SC suture can be used as an alternative to the PW, with similar strength and less bulk for repairs using graft tendons of similar diameter. Surgeons should be aware of the effect of graft tendon size and repair method on strength and bulk when performing flexor tendon grafts.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods of joining tendons of similar and dissimilar sizes between recipient and donor tendons for flexor tendon grafts. Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and peroneus longus (PL) canine tendons were harvested and divided into four groups. The repair technique we compared was a step-cut (SC) suture and a Pulvertaft weave (PW). FDP tendons were significantly larger in diameter than PL tendons (p < 0.05). The volume of the SC repairs using either FDP or PL tendon as a graft was significantly smaller than PW repairs (p < 0.05). The ultimate load to failure and repair stiffness in FDP graft tendons significantly increased compared with the PL graft tendons (p < 0.05). The SC suture can be used as an alternative to the PW, with similar strength and less bulk for repairs using graft tendons of similar diameter. Surgeons should be aware of the effect of graft tendon size and repair method on strength and bulk when performing flexor tendon grafts.

KW - biomechanics

KW - Flexor tendon

KW - graft

KW - repair

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868113055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868113055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1753193412442460

DO - 10.1177/1753193412442460

M3 - Article

C2 - 22490997

AN - SCOPUS:84868113055

VL - 37

SP - 848

EP - 854

JO - Hand

JF - Hand

SN - 1558-9447

IS - 9

ER -