Comparison of provider claims data versus medical records review for assessing provision of adult preventive services

James M. Naessens, Kari L. Ruud, Sidna M. Tulledge-Scheitel, Robert J. Stroebel, Rosa L. Cabanela

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Administrative claims data are often used to assess the delivery of preventive services, yet there are important limitations. This study assessed the use of claims data to measure quality for pay-for-performance and as a preventive services screening tool compared with medical records review. Accuracy and bias in relying on claims data from a provider perspective were investigated, including a comparison of practice types. Claims data consistently underestimated the rate of preventive services, but the type of practice influenced accuracy. Claims data should be used cautiously, if at all, for pay for performance or to trigger reminders for preventive services completion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-186
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Ambulatory Care Management
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Keywords

  • Claims data
  • Pay for performance
  • Preventive service
  • Quality measure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of provider claims data versus medical records review for assessing provision of adult preventive services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this