TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of cold-quartz ultraviolet, low-energy laser, and occlusion in wound healing in a swine model
AU - Basford, Jeffrey R.
AU - Hallman, Horace O.
AU - Sheffield, Charles G.
AU - Mackey, George L.
PY - 1986/3
Y1 - 1986/3
N2 - A randomized, blind, controlled study used six pigs to examine the effectiveness of low-energy HeNe laser irradiation (632.8nm), cold-quartz UV (254nm), occlusion, and exposure in the treatment of full thickness skin wounds. Laser-treated wounds received a nominal dose of 54mW daily on a schedule of six days/week, UV-treated wounds were given two minimal erythemal dose treatments, twice daily, six days a week, and occluded wounds were checked and dressings replaced as needed twice daily, six days a week. All wounds were treated until clinically healed. Time to closure, wound strength, and bacterial colonization were monitored. There were no complications. Although the laser-treated wounds healed faster than the exposed-control wounds (20.3 ± 0.9days vs 21.1 ± 2days), only the occluded wounds healed significantly (p≤0.05) faster than the controls (18 ± 1.6days vs 20.6 ± 1.4days). No statistically significant difference in bacterial colonization or wound strength was noted although the occlusion-treated wounds tended to be the strongest.
AB - A randomized, blind, controlled study used six pigs to examine the effectiveness of low-energy HeNe laser irradiation (632.8nm), cold-quartz UV (254nm), occlusion, and exposure in the treatment of full thickness skin wounds. Laser-treated wounds received a nominal dose of 54mW daily on a schedule of six days/week, UV-treated wounds were given two minimal erythemal dose treatments, twice daily, six days a week, and occluded wounds were checked and dressings replaced as needed twice daily, six days a week. All wounds were treated until clinically healed. Time to closure, wound strength, and bacterial colonization were monitored. There were no complications. Although the laser-treated wounds healed faster than the exposed-control wounds (20.3 ± 0.9days vs 21.1 ± 2days), only the occluded wounds healed significantly (p≤0.05) faster than the controls (18 ± 1.6days vs 20.6 ± 1.4days). No statistically significant difference in bacterial colonization or wound strength was noted although the occlusion-treated wounds tended to be the strongest.
KW - Laser coagulation
KW - Lasers
KW - Swine
KW - Ultraviolet therapy
KW - Wound healing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022497894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022497894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90053-5
DO - 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90053-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 3954575
AN - SCOPUS:0022497894
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 67
SP - 151
EP - 154
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -