Comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization therapies: Evidence from a national hospital discharge database

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Clinical equipoise of carotid revascularization therapies remains controversial. We sought to determine whether adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) were similar using propensity score-matched analysis of retrospective data from a large hospital discharge database. Methods-All CEA and CAS cases were identified from the 2006 to 2011 Premier Perspective Database and subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching using 33 clinical covariates associated with carotid revascularization. A primary composite end point of peri- or postoperative mortality, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction and a modified composite end point excluding acute myocardial infarction were used to compare our findings with recent prospective controlled trials. Multivariate regression and Cox-proportional hazard ratio survival analysis were performed to compare revascularization therapy outcomes. Results-After 1:1 propensity score matching, 24 004 (12 002 CEA and CAS) asymptomatic and 3506 (1753 CEA and CAS) symptomatic procedures were included. The risk of the primary composite end point was significantly higher after CAS than CEA in both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.40 [1.19-1.65]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio=2.31 [1.78- 3.00]; P<0.0001) presentations, irrespective of age (P=0.28) or sex (P=0.35). Similar findings were observed using the modified composite end point for both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.25-1.78]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.25-4.07]; P<0.0001) presentations. Acute myocardial infarction risk was not significantly different between revascularization therapies, regardless of clinical presentation (P=0.71 and 0.24). Conclusions-Among individuals undergoing carotid artery revascularization from a large sample of US hospitals, CAS was associated with higher risk of perioperative mortality, stroke, and unfavorable discharges compared with CEA for all ages and clinical presentations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3311-3319
Number of pages9
JournalStroke
Volume45
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Carotid Endarterectomy
Angioplasty
Databases
Propensity Score
Odds Ratio
Myocardial Infarction
Therapeutics
Stroke
Mortality
Survival Analysis
Carotid Arteries

Keywords

  • Angioplasty
  • Carotid stenosis
  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • Endarterectomy, carotid
  • Health policy
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Stenting, carotid

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization therapies : Evidence from a national hospital discharge database. / McDonald, Robert; McDonald, Jennifer S; Therneau, Terry M; Lanzino, Giuseppe; Kallmes, David F; Cloft, Harry J.

In: Stroke, Vol. 45, No. 11, 2014, p. 3311-3319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{636bcdddd7e741f78c1955e516a249cc,
title = "Comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization therapies: Evidence from a national hospital discharge database",
abstract = "Background and Purpose-Clinical equipoise of carotid revascularization therapies remains controversial. We sought to determine whether adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) were similar using propensity score-matched analysis of retrospective data from a large hospital discharge database. Methods-All CEA and CAS cases were identified from the 2006 to 2011 Premier Perspective Database and subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching using 33 clinical covariates associated with carotid revascularization. A primary composite end point of peri- or postoperative mortality, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction and a modified composite end point excluding acute myocardial infarction were used to compare our findings with recent prospective controlled trials. Multivariate regression and Cox-proportional hazard ratio survival analysis were performed to compare revascularization therapy outcomes. Results-After 1:1 propensity score matching, 24 004 (12 002 CEA and CAS) asymptomatic and 3506 (1753 CEA and CAS) symptomatic procedures were included. The risk of the primary composite end point was significantly higher after CAS than CEA in both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.40 [1.19-1.65]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio=2.31 [1.78- 3.00]; P<0.0001) presentations, irrespective of age (P=0.28) or sex (P=0.35). Similar findings were observed using the modified composite end point for both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.25-1.78]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.25-4.07]; P<0.0001) presentations. Acute myocardial infarction risk was not significantly different between revascularization therapies, regardless of clinical presentation (P=0.71 and 0.24). Conclusions-Among individuals undergoing carotid artery revascularization from a large sample of US hospitals, CAS was associated with higher risk of perioperative mortality, stroke, and unfavorable discharges compared with CEA for all ages and clinical presentations.",
keywords = "Angioplasty, Carotid stenosis, Comparative effectiveness research, Endarterectomy, carotid, Health policy, Outcome assessment (health care), Stenting, carotid",
author = "Robert McDonald and McDonald, {Jennifer S} and Therneau, {Terry M} and Giuseppe Lanzino and Kallmes, {David F} and Cloft, {Harry J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "3311--3319",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative effectiveness of carotid revascularization therapies

T2 - Evidence from a national hospital discharge database

AU - McDonald, Robert

AU - McDonald, Jennifer S

AU - Therneau, Terry M

AU - Lanzino, Giuseppe

AU - Kallmes, David F

AU - Cloft, Harry J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and Purpose-Clinical equipoise of carotid revascularization therapies remains controversial. We sought to determine whether adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) were similar using propensity score-matched analysis of retrospective data from a large hospital discharge database. Methods-All CEA and CAS cases were identified from the 2006 to 2011 Premier Perspective Database and subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching using 33 clinical covariates associated with carotid revascularization. A primary composite end point of peri- or postoperative mortality, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction and a modified composite end point excluding acute myocardial infarction were used to compare our findings with recent prospective controlled trials. Multivariate regression and Cox-proportional hazard ratio survival analysis were performed to compare revascularization therapy outcomes. Results-After 1:1 propensity score matching, 24 004 (12 002 CEA and CAS) asymptomatic and 3506 (1753 CEA and CAS) symptomatic procedures were included. The risk of the primary composite end point was significantly higher after CAS than CEA in both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.40 [1.19-1.65]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio=2.31 [1.78- 3.00]; P<0.0001) presentations, irrespective of age (P=0.28) or sex (P=0.35). Similar findings were observed using the modified composite end point for both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.25-1.78]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.25-4.07]; P<0.0001) presentations. Acute myocardial infarction risk was not significantly different between revascularization therapies, regardless of clinical presentation (P=0.71 and 0.24). Conclusions-Among individuals undergoing carotid artery revascularization from a large sample of US hospitals, CAS was associated with higher risk of perioperative mortality, stroke, and unfavorable discharges compared with CEA for all ages and clinical presentations.

AB - Background and Purpose-Clinical equipoise of carotid revascularization therapies remains controversial. We sought to determine whether adverse outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) were similar using propensity score-matched analysis of retrospective data from a large hospital discharge database. Methods-All CEA and CAS cases were identified from the 2006 to 2011 Premier Perspective Database and subjected to 1:1 propensity score matching using 33 clinical covariates associated with carotid revascularization. A primary composite end point of peri- or postoperative mortality, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction and a modified composite end point excluding acute myocardial infarction were used to compare our findings with recent prospective controlled trials. Multivariate regression and Cox-proportional hazard ratio survival analysis were performed to compare revascularization therapy outcomes. Results-After 1:1 propensity score matching, 24 004 (12 002 CEA and CAS) asymptomatic and 3506 (1753 CEA and CAS) symptomatic procedures were included. The risk of the primary composite end point was significantly higher after CAS than CEA in both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.40 [1.19-1.65]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio=2.31 [1.78- 3.00]; P<0.0001) presentations, irrespective of age (P=0.28) or sex (P=0.35). Similar findings were observed using the modified composite end point for both asymptomatic (odds ratio, 1.49 [1.25-1.78]; P<0.0001) and symptomatic (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.25-4.07]; P<0.0001) presentations. Acute myocardial infarction risk was not significantly different between revascularization therapies, regardless of clinical presentation (P=0.71 and 0.24). Conclusions-Among individuals undergoing carotid artery revascularization from a large sample of US hospitals, CAS was associated with higher risk of perioperative mortality, stroke, and unfavorable discharges compared with CEA for all ages and clinical presentations.

KW - Angioplasty

KW - Carotid stenosis

KW - Comparative effectiveness research

KW - Endarterectomy, carotid

KW - Health policy

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Stenting, carotid

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922481275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922481275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006323

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006323

M3 - Article

C2 - 25300973

AN - SCOPUS:84922481275

VL - 45

SP - 3311

EP - 3319

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 11

ER -