Clinical determinants of hemodynamic and symptomatic responses in 2,000 patients during adenosine scintigraphy

Donald L. Johnston, David O. Hodge, Mona R. Hopfenspirger, Raymond J Gibbons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether subsets of patients referred for a clinically indicated radionuclide adenosine stress study respond differently to a standard infusion of adenosine. Material and Methods: We assessed multiple clinical and hemodynamic variables in the first 2,000 patients who underwent adenosine perfusion studies in our laboratory. A relevant clinical variable was defined as one that was significantly associated with changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion. Relevant clinical variables that were most significantly related to hemodynamic variables included age, gender, rhythm (atrial fibrillation), diabetes, and left ventricular function. These variables were then related to symptomatic responses (adverse effects) to adenosine infusion. To determine whether the different peripheral responses to adenosine reflected clinically important differences in coronary vasodilatation, we compared perfusion imaging with coronary angiographic findings in the 408 patients who underwent both studies within 6 months of each other. Results: The decrease in systolic b1ood pressure was greater and the reflex tachycardia was less patients 70 years of age or older and in those with insulin-dependent diabetes in comparison with younger patients and those without type 1 diabetes. Men had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did women. Patients with atrial fibrillation and those with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did those in sinus rhythm or those with an ejection fraction of 40% or more. Age 70 years or older, male gender, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% were associated with fewer symptoms and less severe chest pain in comparison with patients without these variables. For patients with coronary angiograms, the relationship between coronary artery disease evident on angiography and perfusion abnormalities noted on scintigraphy was not different for any of the relevant clinical variables. Conclusion: Common clinical patient subsets are associated with different peripheral hemodynamic and symptomatic responses to infusion of adenosine. Despite these observations, however, the ability to detect coronary artery disease with perfusion imaging is not obviously altered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-320
Number of pages7
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume73
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Radionuclide Imaging
Adenosine
Hemodynamics
Atrial Fibrillation
Blood Pressure
Perfusion Imaging
Heart Rate
Stroke Volume
Coronary Artery Disease
Angiography
Perfusion
Aptitude
Chest Pain
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Left Ventricular Function
Tachycardia
Vasodilation
Radioisotopes
Reflex
Insulin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clinical determinants of hemodynamic and symptomatic responses in 2,000 patients during adenosine scintigraphy. / Johnston, Donald L.; Hodge, David O.; Hopfenspirger, Mona R.; Gibbons, Raymond J.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 73, No. 4, 1998, p. 314-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnston, Donald L. ; Hodge, David O. ; Hopfenspirger, Mona R. ; Gibbons, Raymond J. / Clinical determinants of hemodynamic and symptomatic responses in 2,000 patients during adenosine scintigraphy. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1998 ; Vol. 73, No. 4. pp. 314-320.
@article{9ca0b68411214b309d0bbbaf5aa64cc6,
title = "Clinical determinants of hemodynamic and symptomatic responses in 2,000 patients during adenosine scintigraphy",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether subsets of patients referred for a clinically indicated radionuclide adenosine stress study respond differently to a standard infusion of adenosine. Material and Methods: We assessed multiple clinical and hemodynamic variables in the first 2,000 patients who underwent adenosine perfusion studies in our laboratory. A relevant clinical variable was defined as one that was significantly associated with changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion. Relevant clinical variables that were most significantly related to hemodynamic variables included age, gender, rhythm (atrial fibrillation), diabetes, and left ventricular function. These variables were then related to symptomatic responses (adverse effects) to adenosine infusion. To determine whether the different peripheral responses to adenosine reflected clinically important differences in coronary vasodilatation, we compared perfusion imaging with coronary angiographic findings in the 408 patients who underwent both studies within 6 months of each other. Results: The decrease in systolic b1ood pressure was greater and the reflex tachycardia was less patients 70 years of age or older and in those with insulin-dependent diabetes in comparison with younger patients and those without type 1 diabetes. Men had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did women. Patients with atrial fibrillation and those with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40{\%} had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did those in sinus rhythm or those with an ejection fraction of 40{\%} or more. Age 70 years or older, male gender, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40{\%} were associated with fewer symptoms and less severe chest pain in comparison with patients without these variables. For patients with coronary angiograms, the relationship between coronary artery disease evident on angiography and perfusion abnormalities noted on scintigraphy was not different for any of the relevant clinical variables. Conclusion: Common clinical patient subsets are associated with different peripheral hemodynamic and symptomatic responses to infusion of adenosine. Despite these observations, however, the ability to detect coronary artery disease with perfusion imaging is not obviously altered.",
author = "Johnston, {Donald L.} and Hodge, {David O.} and Hopfenspirger, {Mona R.} and Gibbons, {Raymond J}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "314--320",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical determinants of hemodynamic and symptomatic responses in 2,000 patients during adenosine scintigraphy

AU - Johnston, Donald L.

AU - Hodge, David O.

AU - Hopfenspirger, Mona R.

AU - Gibbons, Raymond J

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective: To determine whether subsets of patients referred for a clinically indicated radionuclide adenosine stress study respond differently to a standard infusion of adenosine. Material and Methods: We assessed multiple clinical and hemodynamic variables in the first 2,000 patients who underwent adenosine perfusion studies in our laboratory. A relevant clinical variable was defined as one that was significantly associated with changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion. Relevant clinical variables that were most significantly related to hemodynamic variables included age, gender, rhythm (atrial fibrillation), diabetes, and left ventricular function. These variables were then related to symptomatic responses (adverse effects) to adenosine infusion. To determine whether the different peripheral responses to adenosine reflected clinically important differences in coronary vasodilatation, we compared perfusion imaging with coronary angiographic findings in the 408 patients who underwent both studies within 6 months of each other. Results: The decrease in systolic b1ood pressure was greater and the reflex tachycardia was less patients 70 years of age or older and in those with insulin-dependent diabetes in comparison with younger patients and those without type 1 diabetes. Men had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did women. Patients with atrial fibrillation and those with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did those in sinus rhythm or those with an ejection fraction of 40% or more. Age 70 years or older, male gender, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% were associated with fewer symptoms and less severe chest pain in comparison with patients without these variables. For patients with coronary angiograms, the relationship between coronary artery disease evident on angiography and perfusion abnormalities noted on scintigraphy was not different for any of the relevant clinical variables. Conclusion: Common clinical patient subsets are associated with different peripheral hemodynamic and symptomatic responses to infusion of adenosine. Despite these observations, however, the ability to detect coronary artery disease with perfusion imaging is not obviously altered.

AB - Objective: To determine whether subsets of patients referred for a clinically indicated radionuclide adenosine stress study respond differently to a standard infusion of adenosine. Material and Methods: We assessed multiple clinical and hemodynamic variables in the first 2,000 patients who underwent adenosine perfusion studies in our laboratory. A relevant clinical variable was defined as one that was significantly associated with changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion. Relevant clinical variables that were most significantly related to hemodynamic variables included age, gender, rhythm (atrial fibrillation), diabetes, and left ventricular function. These variables were then related to symptomatic responses (adverse effects) to adenosine infusion. To determine whether the different peripheral responses to adenosine reflected clinically important differences in coronary vasodilatation, we compared perfusion imaging with coronary angiographic findings in the 408 patients who underwent both studies within 6 months of each other. Results: The decrease in systolic b1ood pressure was greater and the reflex tachycardia was less patients 70 years of age or older and in those with insulin-dependent diabetes in comparison with younger patients and those without type 1 diabetes. Men had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did women. Patients with atrial fibrillation and those with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% had smaller decreases in blood pressure and smaller increases in heart rate than did those in sinus rhythm or those with an ejection fraction of 40% or more. Age 70 years or older, male gender, atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% were associated with fewer symptoms and less severe chest pain in comparison with patients without these variables. For patients with coronary angiograms, the relationship between coronary artery disease evident on angiography and perfusion abnormalities noted on scintigraphy was not different for any of the relevant clinical variables. Conclusion: Common clinical patient subsets are associated with different peripheral hemodynamic and symptomatic responses to infusion of adenosine. Despite these observations, however, the ability to detect coronary artery disease with perfusion imaging is not obviously altered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031917712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031917712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9559034

AN - SCOPUS:0031917712

VL - 73

SP - 314

EP - 320

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 4

ER -