Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy

A comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and 137Cs

Michelle Howard, Chris Beltran, Jann N Sarkaria, Michael G. Herman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. 137Cesium (137Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of 137Cs relative to that of 6MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)608-613
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Radiation Research
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Relative Biological Effectiveness
radiation therapy
Radiotherapy
X-Rays
Radiation
cultured cells
radiation
x rays
Cell Line
Glioma
dosage
ovaries
biological effects
hamsters
Osteosarcoma
Cricetulus
lungs
Ovary
Cell Survival
cancer

Keywords

  • 6 MV X-rays
  • Cesium
  • radiotherapy
  • Relative biological effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy : A comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and 137Cs. / Howard, Michelle; Beltran, Chris; Sarkaria, Jann N; Herman, Michael G.

In: Journal of Radiation Research, Vol. 58, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 608-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f26f7e08771466d92f4195074658b6e,
title = "Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy: A comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and 137Cs",
abstract = "Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. 137Cesium (137Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of 137Cs relative to that of 6MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11{\%} for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36{\%}. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.",
keywords = "6 MV X-rays, Cesium, radiotherapy, Relative biological effectiveness",
author = "Michelle Howard and Chris Beltran and Sarkaria, {Jann N} and Herman, {Michael G.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jrr/rrx018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "608--613",
journal = "Journal of Radiation Research",
issn = "0449-3060",
publisher = "Japan Radiation Research Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization of relative biological effectiveness for conventional radiation therapy

T2 - A comparison of clinical 6 MV X-rays and 137Cs

AU - Howard, Michelle

AU - Beltran, Chris

AU - Sarkaria, Jann N

AU - Herman, Michael G.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. 137Cesium (137Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of 137Cs relative to that of 6MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.

AB - Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. 137Cesium (137Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of 137Cs relative to that of 6MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.

KW - 6 MV X-rays

KW - Cesium

KW - radiotherapy

KW - Relative biological effectiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032438219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032438219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jrr/rrx018

DO - 10.1093/jrr/rrx018

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 608

EP - 613

JO - Journal of Radiation Research

JF - Journal of Radiation Research

SN - 0449-3060

IS - 5

ER -