Changes in function and disability after resistance training: Does velocity matter? A pilot study

Stephen P. Sayers, Jonathan Bean, Anthony Cuoco, Nathan K LeBrasseur, Alan Jette, Roger A. Fielding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on functional performance and disability outcomes in physically limited older women. Design: A total of 16 wk of high-velocity resistance training or traditional low-velocity resistance training consisting of knee extension and leg press exercises was performed three times per week by 30 women with self-reported disability to compare their effect on functional performance and disability. Tests of dynamic balance, stair-climb time, chair-rise time, and gait velocity were used to assess changes in functional performance. Changes in disability were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form. Results: Dynamic balance and stair-climb time improved 8% and 10%, respectively, with training. Self-reported disability, physical functioning, role physical, and mental health improved 11, 9, and 5% with training, respectively. There were no significant differences between high- and low-velocity training groups. Conclusions: High- and low-velocity training achieved similar improvements in functional performance and disability. Improvements in functional performance and disability were modest compared with robust increases in strength and power. Specific modes of training or behavioral strategies may be necessary to optimize improvements in these outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-613
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume82
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Gait
Leg
Knee
Mental Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Exercise
Stair Climbing

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Disablement Outcomes
  • Functional Performance
  • Impairment
  • Lower Limb Power
  • Lower Limb Strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Changes in function and disability after resistance training : Does velocity matter? A pilot study. / Sayers, Stephen P.; Bean, Jonathan; Cuoco, Anthony; LeBrasseur, Nathan K; Jette, Alan; Fielding, Roger A.

In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 8, 01.08.2003, p. 605-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sayers, Stephen P. ; Bean, Jonathan ; Cuoco, Anthony ; LeBrasseur, Nathan K ; Jette, Alan ; Fielding, Roger A. / Changes in function and disability after resistance training : Does velocity matter? A pilot study. In: American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2003 ; Vol. 82, No. 8. pp. 605-613.
@article{6233f94f7efb421ea5ce7ef1af6bfc49,
title = "Changes in function and disability after resistance training: Does velocity matter? A pilot study",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on functional performance and disability outcomes in physically limited older women. Design: A total of 16 wk of high-velocity resistance training or traditional low-velocity resistance training consisting of knee extension and leg press exercises was performed three times per week by 30 women with self-reported disability to compare their effect on functional performance and disability. Tests of dynamic balance, stair-climb time, chair-rise time, and gait velocity were used to assess changes in functional performance. Changes in disability were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form. Results: Dynamic balance and stair-climb time improved 8{\%} and 10{\%}, respectively, with training. Self-reported disability, physical functioning, role physical, and mental health improved 11, 9, and 5{\%} with training, respectively. There were no significant differences between high- and low-velocity training groups. Conclusions: High- and low-velocity training achieved similar improvements in functional performance and disability. Improvements in functional performance and disability were modest compared with robust increases in strength and power. Specific modes of training or behavioral strategies may be necessary to optimize improvements in these outcomes.",
keywords = "Aging, Disablement Outcomes, Functional Performance, Impairment, Lower Limb Power, Lower Limb Strength",
author = "Sayers, {Stephen P.} and Jonathan Bean and Anthony Cuoco and LeBrasseur, {Nathan K} and Alan Jette and Fielding, {Roger A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00002060-200308000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "605--613",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in function and disability after resistance training

T2 - Does velocity matter? A pilot study

AU - Sayers, Stephen P.

AU - Bean, Jonathan

AU - Cuoco, Anthony

AU - LeBrasseur, Nathan K

AU - Jette, Alan

AU - Fielding, Roger A.

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Objective: To compare the effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on functional performance and disability outcomes in physically limited older women. Design: A total of 16 wk of high-velocity resistance training or traditional low-velocity resistance training consisting of knee extension and leg press exercises was performed three times per week by 30 women with self-reported disability to compare their effect on functional performance and disability. Tests of dynamic balance, stair-climb time, chair-rise time, and gait velocity were used to assess changes in functional performance. Changes in disability were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form. Results: Dynamic balance and stair-climb time improved 8% and 10%, respectively, with training. Self-reported disability, physical functioning, role physical, and mental health improved 11, 9, and 5% with training, respectively. There were no significant differences between high- and low-velocity training groups. Conclusions: High- and low-velocity training achieved similar improvements in functional performance and disability. Improvements in functional performance and disability were modest compared with robust increases in strength and power. Specific modes of training or behavioral strategies may be necessary to optimize improvements in these outcomes.

AB - Objective: To compare the effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on functional performance and disability outcomes in physically limited older women. Design: A total of 16 wk of high-velocity resistance training or traditional low-velocity resistance training consisting of knee extension and leg press exercises was performed three times per week by 30 women with self-reported disability to compare their effect on functional performance and disability. Tests of dynamic balance, stair-climb time, chair-rise time, and gait velocity were used to assess changes in functional performance. Changes in disability were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form. Results: Dynamic balance and stair-climb time improved 8% and 10%, respectively, with training. Self-reported disability, physical functioning, role physical, and mental health improved 11, 9, and 5% with training, respectively. There were no significant differences between high- and low-velocity training groups. Conclusions: High- and low-velocity training achieved similar improvements in functional performance and disability. Improvements in functional performance and disability were modest compared with robust increases in strength and power. Specific modes of training or behavioral strategies may be necessary to optimize improvements in these outcomes.

KW - Aging

KW - Disablement Outcomes

KW - Functional Performance

KW - Impairment

KW - Lower Limb Power

KW - Lower Limb Strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037768792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037768792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002060-200308000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00002060-200308000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 12872017

AN - SCOPUS:0037768792

VL - 82

SP - 605

EP - 613

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 8

ER -