Cervical tissue collection methods for RNA preservation: Comparison of snap-frozen, ethanol-fixed, and RNAlater-fixation

Sophia S. Wang, Mark E. Sherman, Janet S. Rader, Joseph Carreon, Mark Schiffman, Carl C. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Promising molecular techniques may allow for testing of novel and complex hypotheses such as defining gene expression profiles in specific cells, tumors, or their microenvironments. For most large cancer epidemiologic and population-based studies, however, application of such promising techniques may not be possible owing to constraints of specimen preservation from paraffin-embedded tissues. Alternative methods would ideally preserve tissue morphology and not degrade DNA or RNA. We conducted a comparison of snap-freezing (freezing with liquid nitrogen), ethanol-fixation with low melt polyester wax embedding, and RNAlater-preservation techniques to determine which method was optimal for subsequent assessment of gene expression changes in cervical cancer. From each of 15 women with cancer and 30 without, we procured 3 pieces of cervical tissue and compared snap-freezing, ethanol-fixation, and RNAlater-preservation techniques. Despite slight loss in morphologic quality from snap-frozen cervix tissues, RNA quality was equivalent to or better than RNAlater-preserved tissues and significantly exceeded that from ethanol-fixed/polyester wax embedded tissue. In conclusion, despite the moderate logistical constraints in set-up that required either liquid nitrogen or dry ice on-site for snap-freezing tissue, the ease of downstream processing and consistent high quality RNA made it preferable to the other 2 methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)144-148
Number of pages5
JournalDiagnostic Molecular Pathology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Ethanol
RNA
Freezing
Polyesters
Waxes
Dry Ice
Neoplasms
Nitrogen Fixation
Transcriptome
Cervix Uteri
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Paraffin
Nitrogen
Gene Expression
DNA
Population

Keywords

  • Cervix
  • Preservation
  • RNA
  • Tissue

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Cervical tissue collection methods for RNA preservation : Comparison of snap-frozen, ethanol-fixed, and RNAlater-fixation. / Wang, Sophia S.; Sherman, Mark E.; Rader, Janet S.; Carreon, Joseph; Schiffman, Mark; Baker, Carl C.

In: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 09.2006, p. 144-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Sophia S. ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Rader, Janet S. ; Carreon, Joseph ; Schiffman, Mark ; Baker, Carl C. / Cervical tissue collection methods for RNA preservation : Comparison of snap-frozen, ethanol-fixed, and RNAlater-fixation. In: Diagnostic Molecular Pathology. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 144-148.
@article{ef58acebd2a6448f925f3da1af9e9e9f,
title = "Cervical tissue collection methods for RNA preservation: Comparison of snap-frozen, ethanol-fixed, and RNAlater-fixation",
abstract = "Promising molecular techniques may allow for testing of novel and complex hypotheses such as defining gene expression profiles in specific cells, tumors, or their microenvironments. For most large cancer epidemiologic and population-based studies, however, application of such promising techniques may not be possible owing to constraints of specimen preservation from paraffin-embedded tissues. Alternative methods would ideally preserve tissue morphology and not degrade DNA or RNA. We conducted a comparison of snap-freezing (freezing with liquid nitrogen), ethanol-fixation with low melt polyester wax embedding, and RNAlater-preservation techniques to determine which method was optimal for subsequent assessment of gene expression changes in cervical cancer. From each of 15 women with cancer and 30 without, we procured 3 pieces of cervical tissue and compared snap-freezing, ethanol-fixation, and RNAlater-preservation techniques. Despite slight loss in morphologic quality from snap-frozen cervix tissues, RNA quality was equivalent to or better than RNAlater-preserved tissues and significantly exceeded that from ethanol-fixed/polyester wax embedded tissue. In conclusion, despite the moderate logistical constraints in set-up that required either liquid nitrogen or dry ice on-site for snap-freezing tissue, the ease of downstream processing and consistent high quality RNA made it preferable to the other 2 methods.",
keywords = "Cervix, Preservation, RNA, Tissue",
author = "Wang, {Sophia S.} and Sherman, {Mark E.} and Rader, {Janet S.} and Joseph Carreon and Mark Schiffman and Baker, {Carl C.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.pdm.0000213460.53021.cd",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "144--148",
journal = "Diagnostic Molecular Pathology",
issn = "1052-9551",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cervical tissue collection methods for RNA preservation

T2 - Comparison of snap-frozen, ethanol-fixed, and RNAlater-fixation

AU - Wang, Sophia S.

AU - Sherman, Mark E.

AU - Rader, Janet S.

AU - Carreon, Joseph

AU - Schiffman, Mark

AU - Baker, Carl C.

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Promising molecular techniques may allow for testing of novel and complex hypotheses such as defining gene expression profiles in specific cells, tumors, or their microenvironments. For most large cancer epidemiologic and population-based studies, however, application of such promising techniques may not be possible owing to constraints of specimen preservation from paraffin-embedded tissues. Alternative methods would ideally preserve tissue morphology and not degrade DNA or RNA. We conducted a comparison of snap-freezing (freezing with liquid nitrogen), ethanol-fixation with low melt polyester wax embedding, and RNAlater-preservation techniques to determine which method was optimal for subsequent assessment of gene expression changes in cervical cancer. From each of 15 women with cancer and 30 without, we procured 3 pieces of cervical tissue and compared snap-freezing, ethanol-fixation, and RNAlater-preservation techniques. Despite slight loss in morphologic quality from snap-frozen cervix tissues, RNA quality was equivalent to or better than RNAlater-preserved tissues and significantly exceeded that from ethanol-fixed/polyester wax embedded tissue. In conclusion, despite the moderate logistical constraints in set-up that required either liquid nitrogen or dry ice on-site for snap-freezing tissue, the ease of downstream processing and consistent high quality RNA made it preferable to the other 2 methods.

AB - Promising molecular techniques may allow for testing of novel and complex hypotheses such as defining gene expression profiles in specific cells, tumors, or their microenvironments. For most large cancer epidemiologic and population-based studies, however, application of such promising techniques may not be possible owing to constraints of specimen preservation from paraffin-embedded tissues. Alternative methods would ideally preserve tissue morphology and not degrade DNA or RNA. We conducted a comparison of snap-freezing (freezing with liquid nitrogen), ethanol-fixation with low melt polyester wax embedding, and RNAlater-preservation techniques to determine which method was optimal for subsequent assessment of gene expression changes in cervical cancer. From each of 15 women with cancer and 30 without, we procured 3 pieces of cervical tissue and compared snap-freezing, ethanol-fixation, and RNAlater-preservation techniques. Despite slight loss in morphologic quality from snap-frozen cervix tissues, RNA quality was equivalent to or better than RNAlater-preserved tissues and significantly exceeded that from ethanol-fixed/polyester wax embedded tissue. In conclusion, despite the moderate logistical constraints in set-up that required either liquid nitrogen or dry ice on-site for snap-freezing tissue, the ease of downstream processing and consistent high quality RNA made it preferable to the other 2 methods.

KW - Cervix

KW - Preservation

KW - RNA

KW - Tissue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748304389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748304389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pdm.0000213460.53021.cd

DO - 10.1097/01.pdm.0000213460.53021.cd

M3 - Article

C2 - 16932069

AN - SCOPUS:33748304389

VL - 15

SP - 144

EP - 148

JO - Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

JF - Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

SN - 1052-9551

IS - 3

ER -