TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness Among Latinas in a Low-Resource Setting
AU - Patel, Bhavika K.
AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
AU - Jenkins, Sarah
AU - Rhodes, Deborah J.
AU - Ghosh, Karthik
AU - Borah, Bijan
AU - Suman, Vera
AU - Norman, Aaron
AU - Leaver, Jillian
AU - Jewett, Matt
AU - Hruska, Carrie
AU - Gonzalez, Crystal
AU - Singh, Davinder
AU - Vachon, Celine M.
AU - Breitkopf, Carmen Radecki
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge with gratitude the efforts of the LLEAD study coordination team (Edna Ramos, Theresa Araque, and Erika Martinez), the study promotoras (Ana Alcantar, Liz Hernandez), and the mammography team at MPHC (Eva Burciaga, Emily Ramirez, and Melanie Wilson). The authors acknowledge funding sources for the NS cohort trial from Earlier.org. Drs. Patel and Vachon receive research funding from GRAIL Inc which is directed to the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Patel also receives funding from Hologic, Inc, also directed to the Mayo Clinic.—Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test and the National Institutes of Health (R01MD009682) for the AZ trial. This research is supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health (award R01MD009682). The contents of the article are solely the responsibility of the authors. The sponsor had no role in the study design; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr Hruska has received a grant from Earlier.org—Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test, a Breast Cancer Foundation that supported part of this work. In addition, Dr Hruska receives royalties for licensed technologies by agreement between Mayo Clinic and CMR Naviscan. Dr Vachon declares that to the best of her knowledge, Dr Radecki Breitkopf had no conflicts of interest. All other authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article. All authors are employees.
Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding sources for the NS cohort trial from Earlier.org. Drs. Patel and Vachon receive research funding from GRAIL Inc which is directed to the Mayo Clinic. Dr. Patel also receives funding from Hologic, Inc, also directed to the Mayo Clinic.—Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test and the National Institutes of Health (R01MD009682) for the AZ trial. This research is supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health (award R01MD009682). The contents of the article are solely the responsibility of the authors. The sponsor had no role in the study design; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr Hruska has received a grant from Earlier.org—Friends for an Earlier Breast Cancer Test, a Breast Cancer Foundation that supported part of this work. In addition, Dr Hruska receives royalties for licensed technologies by agreement between Mayo Clinic and CMR Naviscan. Dr Vachon declares that to the best of her knowledge, Dr Radecki Breitkopf had no conflicts of interest. All other authors state that they have no conflict of interest related to the material discussed in this article. All authors are employees.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Radiology
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Purpose: Latinas in low-resource settings face additional barriers to understanding mammographic breast density (MBD) implications. The authors compared MBD awareness and knowledge in Latinas from a safety-net clinic in Arizona with a national sample. Methods: Latinas 40 to 74 years of age were recruited within a safety-net clinic during screening mammography appointments from 2016 to 2019 (AZ cohort) and from a nationally representative online panel in 2017 (NS cohort). Surveys completed in either English or Spanish assessed awareness and knowledge of MBD. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used for comparisons. Results: The NS cohort (n = 152) was older, more educated, more likely to have undergone prior mammography, and more likely to prefer English compared with the AZ cohort (n = 1,327) (P ≤ .03 for all) The NS cohort was more likely to be aware of MBD (32.6% versus 20.7%). Of those aware, the NS cohort was more likely to understand MBD's effect on masking (67.8% versus 37.0%) and breast cancer risk (72.2% versus 32.6%) compared with the AZ cohort (P ≤ .001 for all). Adjusting for age, education, screening history, and language, MBD awareness was similar between the two cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.95; P = .83), but knowledge of MBD as a masking factor (ORadj, 2.8; P = .03) and risk factor (ORadj, 7.2; P < .001) remained higher in the NS cohort compared with the AZ cohort. Conclusions: Differences in MBD awareness, but not knowledge, between Latinas in a low-resource setting compared with a national sample could be explained by age, education, screening history, and language preference, underscoring the need for tailored approaches to MBD education among Latinas.
AB - Purpose: Latinas in low-resource settings face additional barriers to understanding mammographic breast density (MBD) implications. The authors compared MBD awareness and knowledge in Latinas from a safety-net clinic in Arizona with a national sample. Methods: Latinas 40 to 74 years of age were recruited within a safety-net clinic during screening mammography appointments from 2016 to 2019 (AZ cohort) and from a nationally representative online panel in 2017 (NS cohort). Surveys completed in either English or Spanish assessed awareness and knowledge of MBD. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used for comparisons. Results: The NS cohort (n = 152) was older, more educated, more likely to have undergone prior mammography, and more likely to prefer English compared with the AZ cohort (n = 1,327) (P ≤ .03 for all) The NS cohort was more likely to be aware of MBD (32.6% versus 20.7%). Of those aware, the NS cohort was more likely to understand MBD's effect on masking (67.8% versus 37.0%) and breast cancer risk (72.2% versus 32.6%) compared with the AZ cohort (P ≤ .001 for all). Adjusting for age, education, screening history, and language, MBD awareness was similar between the two cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.95; P = .83), but knowledge of MBD as a masking factor (ORadj, 2.8; P = .03) and risk factor (ORadj, 7.2; P < .001) remained higher in the NS cohort compared with the AZ cohort. Conclusions: Differences in MBD awareness, but not knowledge, between Latinas in a low-resource setting compared with a national sample could be explained by age, education, screening history, and language preference, underscoring the need for tailored approaches to MBD education among Latinas.
KW - Breast density
KW - breast cancer risk
KW - breast density awareness
KW - health care disparities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122693116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122693116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.025
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 35033304
AN - SCOPUS:85122693116
SN - 1558-349X
VL - 19
SP - 155
EP - 161
JO - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 1
ER -