Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model

Choll Kim, Andrew Mahar, Andrew Perry, Jennifer Massie, Lichun Lu, Brad Currier, Michael J Yaszemski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures cause pain, deformity, and disability. Polypropylene fumarate (PPF) has shown promise as an injectable cement for bone defects but little is known about its performance for kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of PPF for kyphoplasty in simulated anterior compression fractures in cadaveric vertebral bodies. Thirty-one vertebral bodies (T9 to L4) from osteoporotic cadaveric spines were disarticulated, stripped of soft tissue and compressed on a materials testing machine to determine pretreatment strength and stiffness. All fractures were repaired with inflatable balloon tamps and either polymethylmethacrylate or PPF-30 (containing 30% barium sulfate by dry weight) cement and then retested. Strength restoration with PMMA and PPF-30 were 120% and 104%, respectively, of the pretreatment strengths. For stiffness, PMMA and PPF-30 restored vertebral bodies to 69% and 53%, respectively, of the initial values. There was no significant difference in treatment with either PMMA or PPF-30. The biopolymer PPF-30 exhibits mechanical properties similar to PMMA in a cadaveric kyphoplasty model. PPF biopolymer may be a suitable alternative for kyphoplasty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)604-609
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Kyphoplasty
Compression Fractures
Fumarates
Polypropylenes
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Injections
Biopolymers
Barium Sulfate
Materials Testing
Bone Cements
Spine
Weights and Measures
Pain

Keywords

  • Kyphoplasty
  • Polymethylmethacrylate
  • Polypropylene fumarate
  • Spine biomechanics
  • Vertebral compression fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. / Kim, Choll; Mahar, Andrew; Perry, Andrew; Massie, Jennifer; Lu, Lichun; Currier, Brad; Yaszemski, Michael J.

In: Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, Vol. 20, No. 8, 12.2007, p. 604-609.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{34114d7273ac4b39a2db8774361fbec0,
title = "Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model",
abstract = "Vertebral compression fractures cause pain, deformity, and disability. Polypropylene fumarate (PPF) has shown promise as an injectable cement for bone defects but little is known about its performance for kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of PPF for kyphoplasty in simulated anterior compression fractures in cadaveric vertebral bodies. Thirty-one vertebral bodies (T9 to L4) from osteoporotic cadaveric spines were disarticulated, stripped of soft tissue and compressed on a materials testing machine to determine pretreatment strength and stiffness. All fractures were repaired with inflatable balloon tamps and either polymethylmethacrylate or PPF-30 (containing 30{\%} barium sulfate by dry weight) cement and then retested. Strength restoration with PMMA and PPF-30 were 120{\%} and 104{\%}, respectively, of the pretreatment strengths. For stiffness, PMMA and PPF-30 restored vertebral bodies to 69{\%} and 53{\%}, respectively, of the initial values. There was no significant difference in treatment with either PMMA or PPF-30. The biopolymer PPF-30 exhibits mechanical properties similar to PMMA in a cadaveric kyphoplasty model. PPF biopolymer may be a suitable alternative for kyphoplasty.",
keywords = "Kyphoplasty, Polymethylmethacrylate, Polypropylene fumarate, Spine biomechanics, Vertebral compression fracture",
author = "Choll Kim and Andrew Mahar and Andrew Perry and Jennifer Massie and Lichun Lu and Brad Currier and Yaszemski, {Michael J}",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0b013e318040ad73",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "604--609",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable radiopaque polypropylene fumarate cement for kyphoplasty in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model

AU - Kim, Choll

AU - Mahar, Andrew

AU - Perry, Andrew

AU - Massie, Jennifer

AU - Lu, Lichun

AU - Currier, Brad

AU - Yaszemski, Michael J

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Vertebral compression fractures cause pain, deformity, and disability. Polypropylene fumarate (PPF) has shown promise as an injectable cement for bone defects but little is known about its performance for kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of PPF for kyphoplasty in simulated anterior compression fractures in cadaveric vertebral bodies. Thirty-one vertebral bodies (T9 to L4) from osteoporotic cadaveric spines were disarticulated, stripped of soft tissue and compressed on a materials testing machine to determine pretreatment strength and stiffness. All fractures were repaired with inflatable balloon tamps and either polymethylmethacrylate or PPF-30 (containing 30% barium sulfate by dry weight) cement and then retested. Strength restoration with PMMA and PPF-30 were 120% and 104%, respectively, of the pretreatment strengths. For stiffness, PMMA and PPF-30 restored vertebral bodies to 69% and 53%, respectively, of the initial values. There was no significant difference in treatment with either PMMA or PPF-30. The biopolymer PPF-30 exhibits mechanical properties similar to PMMA in a cadaveric kyphoplasty model. PPF biopolymer may be a suitable alternative for kyphoplasty.

AB - Vertebral compression fractures cause pain, deformity, and disability. Polypropylene fumarate (PPF) has shown promise as an injectable cement for bone defects but little is known about its performance for kyphoplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical performance of PPF for kyphoplasty in simulated anterior compression fractures in cadaveric vertebral bodies. Thirty-one vertebral bodies (T9 to L4) from osteoporotic cadaveric spines were disarticulated, stripped of soft tissue and compressed on a materials testing machine to determine pretreatment strength and stiffness. All fractures were repaired with inflatable balloon tamps and either polymethylmethacrylate or PPF-30 (containing 30% barium sulfate by dry weight) cement and then retested. Strength restoration with PMMA and PPF-30 were 120% and 104%, respectively, of the pretreatment strengths. For stiffness, PMMA and PPF-30 restored vertebral bodies to 69% and 53%, respectively, of the initial values. There was no significant difference in treatment with either PMMA or PPF-30. The biopolymer PPF-30 exhibits mechanical properties similar to PMMA in a cadaveric kyphoplasty model. PPF biopolymer may be a suitable alternative for kyphoplasty.

KW - Kyphoplasty

KW - Polymethylmethacrylate

KW - Polypropylene fumarate

KW - Spine biomechanics

KW - Vertebral compression fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36749075632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36749075632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318040ad73

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318040ad73

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 604

EP - 609

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 8

ER -