Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment

First results

Xiaoyu Wang, Carl Eric Aubin, A. Noelle Larson, Hubert Labelle, Stefan Parent

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical studies reveal remarkable variation in screw patterns, or screw density in spinal instrumentation. Screw density may have a great impact on blood loss, operative time, radiation, risk of screw malposition, and cost. Thus, there is a need to understanding of the biomechanical effects of screw density so as to minimize the number of pedicle screws while ensuring safe and effective instrumentation. The objective of this study was to compare the deformity correction effects and bone-screw loadings of different pedicle screw densities in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spinal instrumentation simulations were performed on three scoliosis patients using 3 screw density patterns (low, preferred, and high screw density) proposed by two experienced surgeons and basic correction techniques: concave rod attachment, rod derotation, apical vertebral derotation, and convex side rod attachment. Simulation results showed that all tested screw densities generated quite similar correction, with differences between the achieved corrections all below 3°. The average bone-screw forces were 244±67N, 214±66 N, and 210±71 N, respectively for low, preferred, and high densities. It remains a complex challenge balancing the benefit of load sharing between more implants with the overconstraints and limited degrees of freedom introduced by the increased number of implants. Studies on additional screw densities and patterns proposed by more surgeons for a variety of cases, and using more diverse correction techniques are necessary to draw stronger conclusions and to recommend the optimal screw density.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch into Spinal Deformities 8
Pages303-306
Number of pages4
Volume176
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event9th Biennial Meeting of the International Research Society of Spinal Deformities, IRSSD 2012 - Poznan, Poland
Duration: Jul 1 2012Jul 4 2012

Other

Other9th Biennial Meeting of the International Research Society of Spinal Deformities, IRSSD 2012
CountryPoland
CityPoznan
Period7/1/127/4/12

Fingerprint

Bone Screws
Scoliosis
Operative Time
Radiation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics
Surgeons
Pedicle Screws
Bone
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Biomechanical model
  • Instrumentation
  • Pedicle screw
  • Scoliosis
  • Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Wang, X., Aubin, C. E., Larson, A. N., Labelle, H., & Parent, S. (2012). Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment: First results. In Research into Spinal Deformities 8 (Vol. 176, pp. 303-306) https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment : First results. / Wang, Xiaoyu; Aubin, Carl Eric; Larson, A. Noelle; Labelle, Hubert; Parent, Stefan.

Research into Spinal Deformities 8. Vol. 176 2012. p. 303-306.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Wang, X, Aubin, CE, Larson, AN, Labelle, H & Parent, S 2012, Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment: First results. in Research into Spinal Deformities 8. vol. 176, pp. 303-306, 9th Biennial Meeting of the International Research Society of Spinal Deformities, IRSSD 2012, Poznan, Poland, 7/1/12. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303
Wang X, Aubin CE, Larson AN, Labelle H, Parent S. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment: First results. In Research into Spinal Deformities 8. Vol. 176. 2012. p. 303-306 https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303
Wang, Xiaoyu ; Aubin, Carl Eric ; Larson, A. Noelle ; Labelle, Hubert ; Parent, Stefan. / Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment : First results. Research into Spinal Deformities 8. Vol. 176 2012. pp. 303-306
@inproceedings{ad98106430634826b71ee426fa5db09b,
title = "Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment: First results",
abstract = "Clinical studies reveal remarkable variation in screw patterns, or screw density in spinal instrumentation. Screw density may have a great impact on blood loss, operative time, radiation, risk of screw malposition, and cost. Thus, there is a need to understanding of the biomechanical effects of screw density so as to minimize the number of pedicle screws while ensuring safe and effective instrumentation. The objective of this study was to compare the deformity correction effects and bone-screw loadings of different pedicle screw densities in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spinal instrumentation simulations were performed on three scoliosis patients using 3 screw density patterns (low, preferred, and high screw density) proposed by two experienced surgeons and basic correction techniques: concave rod attachment, rod derotation, apical vertebral derotation, and convex side rod attachment. Simulation results showed that all tested screw densities generated quite similar correction, with differences between the achieved corrections all below 3°. The average bone-screw forces were 244±67N, 214±66 N, and 210±71 N, respectively for low, preferred, and high densities. It remains a complex challenge balancing the benefit of load sharing between more implants with the overconstraints and limited degrees of freedom introduced by the increased number of implants. Studies on additional screw densities and patterns proposed by more surgeons for a variety of cases, and using more diverse correction techniques are necessary to draw stronger conclusions and to recommend the optimal screw density.",
keywords = "Biomechanical model, Instrumentation, Pedicle screw, Scoliosis, Spine",
author = "Xiaoyu Wang and Aubin, {Carl Eric} and Larson, {A. Noelle} and Hubert Labelle and Stefan Parent",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781614990666",
volume = "176",
pages = "303--306",
booktitle = "Research into Spinal Deformities 8",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw density in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment

T2 - First results

AU - Wang, Xiaoyu

AU - Aubin, Carl Eric

AU - Larson, A. Noelle

AU - Labelle, Hubert

AU - Parent, Stefan

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Clinical studies reveal remarkable variation in screw patterns, or screw density in spinal instrumentation. Screw density may have a great impact on blood loss, operative time, radiation, risk of screw malposition, and cost. Thus, there is a need to understanding of the biomechanical effects of screw density so as to minimize the number of pedicle screws while ensuring safe and effective instrumentation. The objective of this study was to compare the deformity correction effects and bone-screw loadings of different pedicle screw densities in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spinal instrumentation simulations were performed on three scoliosis patients using 3 screw density patterns (low, preferred, and high screw density) proposed by two experienced surgeons and basic correction techniques: concave rod attachment, rod derotation, apical vertebral derotation, and convex side rod attachment. Simulation results showed that all tested screw densities generated quite similar correction, with differences between the achieved corrections all below 3°. The average bone-screw forces were 244±67N, 214±66 N, and 210±71 N, respectively for low, preferred, and high densities. It remains a complex challenge balancing the benefit of load sharing between more implants with the overconstraints and limited degrees of freedom introduced by the increased number of implants. Studies on additional screw densities and patterns proposed by more surgeons for a variety of cases, and using more diverse correction techniques are necessary to draw stronger conclusions and to recommend the optimal screw density.

AB - Clinical studies reveal remarkable variation in screw patterns, or screw density in spinal instrumentation. Screw density may have a great impact on blood loss, operative time, radiation, risk of screw malposition, and cost. Thus, there is a need to understanding of the biomechanical effects of screw density so as to minimize the number of pedicle screws while ensuring safe and effective instrumentation. The objective of this study was to compare the deformity correction effects and bone-screw loadings of different pedicle screw densities in spinal instrumentation for scoliosis treatment. Spinal instrumentation simulations were performed on three scoliosis patients using 3 screw density patterns (low, preferred, and high screw density) proposed by two experienced surgeons and basic correction techniques: concave rod attachment, rod derotation, apical vertebral derotation, and convex side rod attachment. Simulation results showed that all tested screw densities generated quite similar correction, with differences between the achieved corrections all below 3°. The average bone-screw forces were 244±67N, 214±66 N, and 210±71 N, respectively for low, preferred, and high densities. It remains a complex challenge balancing the benefit of load sharing between more implants with the overconstraints and limited degrees of freedom introduced by the increased number of implants. Studies on additional screw densities and patterns proposed by more surgeons for a variety of cases, and using more diverse correction techniques are necessary to draw stronger conclusions and to recommend the optimal screw density.

KW - Biomechanical model

KW - Instrumentation

KW - Pedicle screw

KW - Scoliosis

KW - Spine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866150999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866150999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-303

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781614990666

VL - 176

SP - 303

EP - 306

BT - Research into Spinal Deformities 8

ER -