Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices

ASGE Technology Committee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims: Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods: In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations. Results: Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs. Conclusions: Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalVideoGIE
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Equipment and Supplies
Laser Lithotripsy
Pancreatic Ducts
Shock
Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Stents
Dilatation
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. / ASGE Technology Committee.

In: VideoGIE, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ASGE Technology Committee. / Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. In: VideoGIE. 2018.
@article{cb3f97039bdb47e1a1167a498bd62a26,
title = "Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices",
abstract = "Background and Aims: Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods: In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations. Results: Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs. Conclusions: Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.",
author = "{ASGE Technology Committee} and Watson, {Rabindra R.} and Parsi, {Mansour A.} and Aslanian, {Harry R.} and Goodman, {Adam J.} and Lichtenstein, {David R.} and Joshua Melson and Udayakumar Navaneethan and Rahul Pannala and Amrita Sethi and Sullivan, {Shelby A.} and Thosani, {Nirav C.} and Guru Trikudanathan and Trindade, {Arvind J.} and Maple, {John T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "VideoGIE",
issn = "2468-4481",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices

AU - ASGE Technology Committee

AU - Watson, Rabindra R.

AU - Parsi, Mansour A.

AU - Aslanian, Harry R.

AU - Goodman, Adam J.

AU - Lichtenstein, David R.

AU - Melson, Joshua

AU - Navaneethan, Udayakumar

AU - Pannala, Rahul

AU - Sethi, Amrita

AU - Sullivan, Shelby A.

AU - Thosani, Nirav C.

AU - Trikudanathan, Guru

AU - Trindade, Arvind J.

AU - Maple, John T.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background and Aims: Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods: In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations. Results: Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs. Conclusions: Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.

AB - Background and Aims: Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods: In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations. Results: Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs. Conclusions: Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053906930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053906930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010

M3 - Article

JO - VideoGIE

JF - VideoGIE

SN - 2468-4481

ER -