Authorship policies of bioethics journals

David B. Resnik, Zubin Master

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3% require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20% provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7% require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3% distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-428
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Authorship
Bioethics
bioethics
responsibility
Empirical Research
qualification
integrity
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Authorship policies of bioethics journals. / Resnik, David B.; Master, Zubin.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 37, No. 7, 01.07.2011, p. 424-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Resnik, David B. ; Master, Zubin. / Authorship policies of bioethics journals. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 424-428.
@article{1ebd7c526d9145d180cbd919539e0752,
title = "Authorship policies of bioethics journals",
abstract = "Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3{\%} of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7{\%} provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3{\%} provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3{\%} require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20{\%} provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7{\%} require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3{\%} distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research.",
author = "Resnik, {David B.} and Zubin Master",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2010.040675",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "424--428",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authorship policies of bioethics journals

AU - Resnik, David B.

AU - Master, Zubin

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3% require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20% provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7% require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3% distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research.

AB - Inappropriate authorship is a common problem in biomedical research and may be becoming one in bioethics, due to the increase in multiple authorship. This paper investigates the authorship policies of bioethics journals to determine whether they provide adequate guidance for researchers who submit articles for publication, which can help deter inappropriate authorship. It was found that 63.3% of bioethics journals provide no guidance on authorship; 36.7% provide guidance on which contributions merit authorship, 23.3% provide guidance on which contributions do not merit authorship, 23.3% require authors to take responsibility for their contributions or for the article as a whole, 20% provide guidance on which contributions merit an acknowledgement but not authorship, 6.7% require authors to describe their contributions, and only 3.3% distinguish between authorship in empirical and conceptual research. To provide authors with effective guidance and promote integrity in bioethics research, bioethics journals should adopt authorship policies that address several important topics, such as the qualifications for authorship, describing authorship contributions, taking responsibility for the research and the difference between authorship in empirical and conceptual research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052401507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052401507&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2010.040675

DO - 10.1136/jme.2010.040675

M3 - Article

C2 - 21266387

AN - SCOPUS:80052401507

VL - 37

SP - 424

EP - 428

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 7

ER -