Assessment of patient selection criteria for treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty

Arlen D. Hanssen, Douglas R. Osmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a group of 37 infected hip arthroplasties (36 patients) treated consecutively between January 1997 and October 1999, the feasibility of published patient selection criteria for direct exchange arthroplasty was tested. These criteria include the requirement of a healthy patient with good soft tissues, minimal femoral bone loss, and an organism identified preoperatively as an antibiotic sensitive gram-positive organism. After assignment of the selection criteria, only four patients (four hips) (11%) were deemed potential candidates for a direct exchange procedure. Infected arthroplasties excluded from a primary exchange included 14 patients (15 hips) with gram-negative or methicillin-resistant grampositive organisms obtained from preoperative joint aspirations, 10 patients (10 hips) with moderate or severe femoral bone loss, four patients (four hips) who required a proximal femoral osteotomy for component removal, two patients (two hips) with poor health status, and two patients (two hips) with poor soft tissues. Because of the increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and an increased prevalence of revision arthroplasties with associated bone loss, the feasibility of published selection criteria for direct exchange are limited. A philosophy of delayed reconstruction for the treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty seems most appropriate in the current era of patient treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number381
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Patient Selection
Hip
Thigh
Bone and Bones
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Methicillin Resistance
Osteotomy
Health Status
Joints
Bacteria
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Assessment of patient selection criteria for treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty. / Hanssen, Arlen D.; Osmon, Douglas R.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 381, 2000, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c5eac599669423eaba58e1ab4ad9204,
title = "Assessment of patient selection criteria for treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty",
abstract = "In a group of 37 infected hip arthroplasties (36 patients) treated consecutively between January 1997 and October 1999, the feasibility of published patient selection criteria for direct exchange arthroplasty was tested. These criteria include the requirement of a healthy patient with good soft tissues, minimal femoral bone loss, and an organism identified preoperatively as an antibiotic sensitive gram-positive organism. After assignment of the selection criteria, only four patients (four hips) (11{\%}) were deemed potential candidates for a direct exchange procedure. Infected arthroplasties excluded from a primary exchange included 14 patients (15 hips) with gram-negative or methicillin-resistant grampositive organisms obtained from preoperative joint aspirations, 10 patients (10 hips) with moderate or severe femoral bone loss, four patients (four hips) who required a proximal femoral osteotomy for component removal, two patients (two hips) with poor health status, and two patients (two hips) with poor soft tissues. Because of the increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and an increased prevalence of revision arthroplasties with associated bone loss, the feasibility of published selection criteria for direct exchange are limited. A philosophy of delayed reconstruction for the treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty seems most appropriate in the current era of patient treatment.",
author = "Hanssen, {Arlen D.} and Osmon, {Douglas R.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "381",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of patient selection criteria for treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty

AU - Hanssen, Arlen D.

AU - Osmon, Douglas R.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - In a group of 37 infected hip arthroplasties (36 patients) treated consecutively between January 1997 and October 1999, the feasibility of published patient selection criteria for direct exchange arthroplasty was tested. These criteria include the requirement of a healthy patient with good soft tissues, minimal femoral bone loss, and an organism identified preoperatively as an antibiotic sensitive gram-positive organism. After assignment of the selection criteria, only four patients (four hips) (11%) were deemed potential candidates for a direct exchange procedure. Infected arthroplasties excluded from a primary exchange included 14 patients (15 hips) with gram-negative or methicillin-resistant grampositive organisms obtained from preoperative joint aspirations, 10 patients (10 hips) with moderate or severe femoral bone loss, four patients (four hips) who required a proximal femoral osteotomy for component removal, two patients (two hips) with poor health status, and two patients (two hips) with poor soft tissues. Because of the increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and an increased prevalence of revision arthroplasties with associated bone loss, the feasibility of published selection criteria for direct exchange are limited. A philosophy of delayed reconstruction for the treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty seems most appropriate in the current era of patient treatment.

AB - In a group of 37 infected hip arthroplasties (36 patients) treated consecutively between January 1997 and October 1999, the feasibility of published patient selection criteria for direct exchange arthroplasty was tested. These criteria include the requirement of a healthy patient with good soft tissues, minimal femoral bone loss, and an organism identified preoperatively as an antibiotic sensitive gram-positive organism. After assignment of the selection criteria, only four patients (four hips) (11%) were deemed potential candidates for a direct exchange procedure. Infected arthroplasties excluded from a primary exchange included 14 patients (15 hips) with gram-negative or methicillin-resistant grampositive organisms obtained from preoperative joint aspirations, 10 patients (10 hips) with moderate or severe femoral bone loss, four patients (four hips) who required a proximal femoral osteotomy for component removal, two patients (two hips) with poor health status, and two patients (two hips) with poor soft tissues. Because of the increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and an increased prevalence of revision arthroplasties with associated bone loss, the feasibility of published selection criteria for direct exchange are limited. A philosophy of delayed reconstruction for the treatment of the infected hip arthroplasty seems most appropriate in the current era of patient treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033661555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033661555&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11127676

AN - SCOPUS:0033661555

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 381

ER -