TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial Intelligence–Augmented Electrocardiogram Detection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in the General Population
AU - Kashou, Anthony H.
AU - Medina-Inojosa, Jose R.
AU - Noseworthy, Peter A.
AU - Rodeheffer, Richard J.
AU - Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
AU - Attia, Itzhak Zachi
AU - Kapa, Suraj
AU - Scott, Christopher G.
AU - Lee, Alexander T.
AU - Friedman, Paul A.
AU - McKie, Paul M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Grant Support: National Institutes of Health grant NHLBI RO1-5502 . This study was made possible by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (grant number R01-AG034676 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Objective: To validate an artificial intelligence–augmented electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm for the detection of preclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in a large community-based cohort. Methods: We identified a randomly selected community-based cohort of 2041 subjects age 45 years or older in Olmsted County, Minnesota. All participants underwent a study echocardiogram and ECG. We first assessed the performance of the AI-ECG to identify LVSD (ejection fraction ≤40%). After excluding participants with clinical heart failure, we further assessed the AI-ECG to detect preclinical LVSD among all patients (n=1996) and in a high-risk subgroup (n=1348). Next we modelled an imputed screening program for preclinical LVSD detection where a positive AI-ECG triggered an echocardiogram. Finally, we assessed the ability of the AI-ECG to predict future LVSD. Participants were enrolled between January 1, 1997, and September 30, 2000; and LVSD surveillance was performed for 10 years after enrollment. Results: For detection of LVSD in the total population (prevalence, 2.0%), the area under the receiver operating curve for AI-ECG was 0.97 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 92%); in the high-risk subgroup (prevalence 2.7%), the area under the curve was 0.97 (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 93%). In an imputed screening program, identification of one preclinical LSVD case would require 88.3 AI-ECGs and 8.7 echocardiograms in the total population and 65.7 AI-ECGs and 5.5 echocardiograms in the high-risk subgroup. The unadjusted hazard ratio for a positive AI-ECG for incident LVSD over 10 years was 2.31 (95% CI, 1.32 to 4.05; P=.004). Conclusion: Artificial intelligence–augmented ECG can identify preclinical LVSD in the community and warrants further study as a screening tool for preclinical LVSD.
AB - Objective: To validate an artificial intelligence–augmented electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) algorithm for the detection of preclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in a large community-based cohort. Methods: We identified a randomly selected community-based cohort of 2041 subjects age 45 years or older in Olmsted County, Minnesota. All participants underwent a study echocardiogram and ECG. We first assessed the performance of the AI-ECG to identify LVSD (ejection fraction ≤40%). After excluding participants with clinical heart failure, we further assessed the AI-ECG to detect preclinical LVSD among all patients (n=1996) and in a high-risk subgroup (n=1348). Next we modelled an imputed screening program for preclinical LVSD detection where a positive AI-ECG triggered an echocardiogram. Finally, we assessed the ability of the AI-ECG to predict future LVSD. Participants were enrolled between January 1, 1997, and September 30, 2000; and LVSD surveillance was performed for 10 years after enrollment. Results: For detection of LVSD in the total population (prevalence, 2.0%), the area under the receiver operating curve for AI-ECG was 0.97 (sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 92%); in the high-risk subgroup (prevalence 2.7%), the area under the curve was 0.97 (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 93%). In an imputed screening program, identification of one preclinical LSVD case would require 88.3 AI-ECGs and 8.7 echocardiograms in the total population and 65.7 AI-ECGs and 5.5 echocardiograms in the high-risk subgroup. The unadjusted hazard ratio for a positive AI-ECG for incident LVSD over 10 years was 2.31 (95% CI, 1.32 to 4.05; P=.004). Conclusion: Artificial intelligence–augmented ECG can identify preclinical LVSD in the community and warrants further study as a screening tool for preclinical LVSD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107744172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107744172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.029
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 34120755
AN - SCOPUS:85107744172
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 96
SP - 2576
EP - 2586
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 10
ER -