Aortic diameter predicts acute type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome

Eun Kyoung Kim, Seung Hyuk Choi, Kiick Sung, Wook Sung Kim, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Jae Kuen Oh, Duk Kyung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Among the parameters for surveillance of patients at risk of acute type A aortic dissection, the aortic size has been considered a cardinal factor. Preventive surgery of the aorta in asymptomatic patients on the basis of size alone is still controversial in patient populations lacking other risk factors for aortic dissection. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of the aortic diameter as a current criterion for elective aortic surgery to prevent the development of aortic dissection in patients without and with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods: We reviewed the data from patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection from December 1994 to March 2009 at our institute. A total of 237 patients who presented with acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled, of whom 31 were diagnosed with MFS. Results: The maximal ascending aorta size was 46.7 mm (range, 42.9-51.6) in non-MFS patients and 58.5 mm (range, 43.8-64.9) in MFS patients (P <.001). Two thirds (74%) of the MFS patients had a maximal aortic root size of ≥45 mm. However, 87% of the 206 non-MFS patients had an aortic diameter <55 mm. Non-MFS patients presenting with an aortic size <55 mm developed aortic dissection at a younger age and had a higher body mass index than those with an aortic size ≥55 mm. Conclusions: Type A aortic dissection occurs in smaller aortas in non-MFS patients compared with those with MFS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1505-1510
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume147
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Marfan Syndrome
Dissection
Aorta
Body Mass Index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Aortic diameter predicts acute type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome. / Kim, Eun Kyoung; Choi, Seung Hyuk; Sung, Kiick; Kim, Wook Sung; Choe, Yeon Hyeon; Oh, Jae Kuen; Kim, Duk Kyung.

In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 147, No. 5, 2014, p. 1505-1510.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Eun Kyoung ; Choi, Seung Hyuk ; Sung, Kiick ; Kim, Wook Sung ; Choe, Yeon Hyeon ; Oh, Jae Kuen ; Kim, Duk Kyung. / Aortic diameter predicts acute type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome. In: Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 147, No. 5. pp. 1505-1510.
@article{fdd36f3694764b98b65e97052132565e,
title = "Aortic diameter predicts acute type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome",
abstract = "Objectives: Among the parameters for surveillance of patients at risk of acute type A aortic dissection, the aortic size has been considered a cardinal factor. Preventive surgery of the aorta in asymptomatic patients on the basis of size alone is still controversial in patient populations lacking other risk factors for aortic dissection. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of the aortic diameter as a current criterion for elective aortic surgery to prevent the development of aortic dissection in patients without and with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods: We reviewed the data from patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection from December 1994 to March 2009 at our institute. A total of 237 patients who presented with acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled, of whom 31 were diagnosed with MFS. Results: The maximal ascending aorta size was 46.7 mm (range, 42.9-51.6) in non-MFS patients and 58.5 mm (range, 43.8-64.9) in MFS patients (P <.001). Two thirds (74{\%}) of the MFS patients had a maximal aortic root size of ≥45 mm. However, 87{\%} of the 206 non-MFS patients had an aortic diameter <55 mm. Non-MFS patients presenting with an aortic size <55 mm developed aortic dissection at a younger age and had a higher body mass index than those with an aortic size ≥55 mm. Conclusions: Type A aortic dissection occurs in smaller aortas in non-MFS patients compared with those with MFS.",
author = "Kim, {Eun Kyoung} and Choi, {Seung Hyuk} and Kiick Sung and Kim, {Wook Sung} and Choe, {Yeon Hyeon} and Oh, {Jae Kuen} and Kim, {Duk Kyung}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "1505--1510",
journal = "Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0022-5223",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aortic diameter predicts acute type A aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome but not in patients without Marfan syndrome

AU - Kim, Eun Kyoung

AU - Choi, Seung Hyuk

AU - Sung, Kiick

AU - Kim, Wook Sung

AU - Choe, Yeon Hyeon

AU - Oh, Jae Kuen

AU - Kim, Duk Kyung

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: Among the parameters for surveillance of patients at risk of acute type A aortic dissection, the aortic size has been considered a cardinal factor. Preventive surgery of the aorta in asymptomatic patients on the basis of size alone is still controversial in patient populations lacking other risk factors for aortic dissection. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of the aortic diameter as a current criterion for elective aortic surgery to prevent the development of aortic dissection in patients without and with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods: We reviewed the data from patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection from December 1994 to March 2009 at our institute. A total of 237 patients who presented with acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled, of whom 31 were diagnosed with MFS. Results: The maximal ascending aorta size was 46.7 mm (range, 42.9-51.6) in non-MFS patients and 58.5 mm (range, 43.8-64.9) in MFS patients (P <.001). Two thirds (74%) of the MFS patients had a maximal aortic root size of ≥45 mm. However, 87% of the 206 non-MFS patients had an aortic diameter <55 mm. Non-MFS patients presenting with an aortic size <55 mm developed aortic dissection at a younger age and had a higher body mass index than those with an aortic size ≥55 mm. Conclusions: Type A aortic dissection occurs in smaller aortas in non-MFS patients compared with those with MFS.

AB - Objectives: Among the parameters for surveillance of patients at risk of acute type A aortic dissection, the aortic size has been considered a cardinal factor. Preventive surgery of the aorta in asymptomatic patients on the basis of size alone is still controversial in patient populations lacking other risk factors for aortic dissection. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of the aortic diameter as a current criterion for elective aortic surgery to prevent the development of aortic dissection in patients without and with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods: We reviewed the data from patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection from December 1994 to March 2009 at our institute. A total of 237 patients who presented with acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled, of whom 31 were diagnosed with MFS. Results: The maximal ascending aorta size was 46.7 mm (range, 42.9-51.6) in non-MFS patients and 58.5 mm (range, 43.8-64.9) in MFS patients (P <.001). Two thirds (74%) of the MFS patients had a maximal aortic root size of ≥45 mm. However, 87% of the 206 non-MFS patients had an aortic diameter <55 mm. Non-MFS patients presenting with an aortic size <55 mm developed aortic dissection at a younger age and had a higher body mass index than those with an aortic size ≥55 mm. Conclusions: Type A aortic dissection occurs in smaller aortas in non-MFS patients compared with those with MFS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899909325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899909325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 23879932

AN - SCOPUS:84899909325

VL - 147

SP - 1505

EP - 1510

JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0022-5223

IS - 5

ER -