Analysis of longitudinal arch supports in stabilizing the arch of the foot

Harold B. Kitaoka, Zong Ping Luo, Kai Nan An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveric feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445, or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magnetic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations consistently increased on load application. Significant differences were observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsiflexion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsiflexion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied provided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standing at ease position.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-256
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number341
StatePublished - Aug 1997

Fingerprint

Foot
Metatarsal Bones
Joints
Talus
Orthotic Devices
Calcaneus
Weight-Bearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Analysis of longitudinal arch supports in stabilizing the arch of the foot. / Kitaoka, Harold B.; Luo, Zong Ping; An, Kai Nan.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 341, 08.1997, p. 250-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kitaoka, Harold B. ; Luo, Zong Ping ; An, Kai Nan. / Analysis of longitudinal arch supports in stabilizing the arch of the foot. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1997 ; No. 341. pp. 250-256.
@article{e745aeccbe114c9499d24bedb1a4c877,
title = "Analysis of longitudinal arch supports in stabilizing the arch of the foot",
abstract = "Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveric feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445, or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magnetic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations consistently increased on load application. Significant differences were observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsiflexion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsiflexion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied provided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standing at ease position.",
author = "Kitaoka, {Harold B.} and Luo, {Zong Ping} and An, {Kai Nan}",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "250--256",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "341",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of longitudinal arch supports in stabilizing the arch of the foot

AU - Kitaoka, Harold B.

AU - Luo, Zong Ping

AU - An, Kai Nan

PY - 1997/8

Y1 - 1997/8

N2 - Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveric feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445, or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magnetic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations consistently increased on load application. Significant differences were observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsiflexion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsiflexion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied provided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standing at ease position.

AB - Two orthotic devices commonly prescribed as arch supports were studied to evaluate their efficacy in stabilizing the foot. Fourteen cadaveric feet were mounted in a loading frame, and an axial load of 222, 445, or 667 N was applied while three-dimensional positions of the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal were monitored with a magnetic tracking system. Feet were tested with and without the use of two commonly prescribed arch supports. The two indices used to assess arch stabilization were arch height and joint rotation. Joint rotations consistently increased on load application. Significant differences were observed with Inserts 1 and 2 in metatarsal talar abduction, dorsiflexion and eversion, calcaneal talar eversion, and talar tibial dorsiflexion. Arch height significantly increased with both inserts. Contrary to previously published results, the arch supports that were studied provided measurable improvement in arch stability in a simulated standing at ease position.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0343051818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0343051818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9269181

AN - SCOPUS:0343051818

SP - 250

EP - 256

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 341

ER -