An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model

Mark L. Wieland, Andrew J. Halvorsen, Rajeev Chaudhry, Darcy A. Reed, Furman S. McDonald, Kris G. Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been recent calls for improved internal medicine outpatient training, yet assessment of clinical and educational variables within existing models is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model on clinical and educational outcomes. DESIGN: Pre-intervention and post-intervention study intervals, comparing the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 academic years. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six residents in a Primary Care Internal Medicine site of a large academic internal medicine residency program who provide care for > 13,000 patients. INTERVENTION: Continuity clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 model characterized by 50 % outpatient and 50 % inpatient experiences scheduled in alternating 1 month blocks, with twice weekly continuity clinic during outpatient months and no clinic during inpatient months. MAIN MEASURES: 1) Clinical outcomes (panel size, patient visits, adherence with chronic disease and preventive service guidelines, continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and perceived safety/teamwork in clinic); 2) Educational outcomes (attendance at teaching conference, resident and faculty satisfaction, faculty assessment of resident clinic performance, and residents' perceived preparedness for outpatient management). RESULTS: Redesign was associated with increased mean panel size (120 vs. 137.6; p ≤ 0.001), decreased continuity of care (63 % vs. 48 % from provider perspective; 61 % vs. 51 % from patient perspective; p ≤ 0.001 for both; team continuity was preserved), decreased missed appointments (12.5 % vs. 10.9 %; p ≤ 0.01), improved perceived safety and teamwork (3.6 vs. 4.1 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), improved mean teaching conference attendance (57.1 vs. 64.4; p ≤ 0.001), improved resident clinic performance (3.6 vs. 3.9 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), and little change in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although this model requires further study in other settings, these results suggest that a 50/50 model may allow residents to manage more patients while enhancing the climate of teamwork and safety in the continuity clinic, compared to traditional models. Future work should explore ways to preserve continuity of care within this model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1014-1019
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Internal Medicine
Continuity of Patient Care
Inpatients
Outpatients
Safety
Teaching
Educational Measurement
Patient Compliance
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Climate
Patient Satisfaction
Primary Health Care
Appointments and Schedules
Chronic Disease
Guidelines

Keywords

  • continuity clinic
  • graduate medical education
  • outcomes research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model. / Wieland, Mark L.; Halvorsen, Andrew J.; Chaudhry, Rajeev; Reed, Darcy A.; McDonald, Furman S.; Thomas, Kris G.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 1014-1019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wieland, Mark L. ; Halvorsen, Andrew J. ; Chaudhry, Rajeev ; Reed, Darcy A. ; McDonald, Furman S. ; Thomas, Kris G. / An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 1014-1019.
@article{de07be35da904502bff5f2bc72e8132f,
title = "An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There have been recent calls for improved internal medicine outpatient training, yet assessment of clinical and educational variables within existing models is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model on clinical and educational outcomes. DESIGN: Pre-intervention and post-intervention study intervals, comparing the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 academic years. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six residents in a Primary Care Internal Medicine site of a large academic internal medicine residency program who provide care for > 13,000 patients. INTERVENTION: Continuity clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 model characterized by 50 {\%} outpatient and 50 {\%} inpatient experiences scheduled in alternating 1 month blocks, with twice weekly continuity clinic during outpatient months and no clinic during inpatient months. MAIN MEASURES: 1) Clinical outcomes (panel size, patient visits, adherence with chronic disease and preventive service guidelines, continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and perceived safety/teamwork in clinic); 2) Educational outcomes (attendance at teaching conference, resident and faculty satisfaction, faculty assessment of resident clinic performance, and residents' perceived preparedness for outpatient management). RESULTS: Redesign was associated with increased mean panel size (120 vs. 137.6; p ≤ 0.001), decreased continuity of care (63 {\%} vs. 48 {\%} from provider perspective; 61 {\%} vs. 51 {\%} from patient perspective; p ≤ 0.001 for both; team continuity was preserved), decreased missed appointments (12.5 {\%} vs. 10.9 {\%}; p ≤ 0.01), improved perceived safety and teamwork (3.6 vs. 4.1 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), improved mean teaching conference attendance (57.1 vs. 64.4; p ≤ 0.001), improved resident clinic performance (3.6 vs. 3.9 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), and little change in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although this model requires further study in other settings, these results suggest that a 50/50 model may allow residents to manage more patients while enhancing the climate of teamwork and safety in the continuity clinic, compared to traditional models. Future work should explore ways to preserve continuity of care within this model.",
keywords = "continuity clinic, graduate medical education, outcomes research",
author = "Wieland, {Mark L.} and Halvorsen, {Andrew J.} and Rajeev Chaudhry and Reed, {Darcy A.} and McDonald, {Furman S.} and Thomas, {Kris G.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-012-2312-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1014--1019",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of internal medicine residency continuity clinic redesign to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model

AU - Wieland, Mark L.

AU - Halvorsen, Andrew J.

AU - Chaudhry, Rajeev

AU - Reed, Darcy A.

AU - McDonald, Furman S.

AU - Thomas, Kris G.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - BACKGROUND: There have been recent calls for improved internal medicine outpatient training, yet assessment of clinical and educational variables within existing models is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model on clinical and educational outcomes. DESIGN: Pre-intervention and post-intervention study intervals, comparing the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 academic years. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six residents in a Primary Care Internal Medicine site of a large academic internal medicine residency program who provide care for > 13,000 patients. INTERVENTION: Continuity clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 model characterized by 50 % outpatient and 50 % inpatient experiences scheduled in alternating 1 month blocks, with twice weekly continuity clinic during outpatient months and no clinic during inpatient months. MAIN MEASURES: 1) Clinical outcomes (panel size, patient visits, adherence with chronic disease and preventive service guidelines, continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and perceived safety/teamwork in clinic); 2) Educational outcomes (attendance at teaching conference, resident and faculty satisfaction, faculty assessment of resident clinic performance, and residents' perceived preparedness for outpatient management). RESULTS: Redesign was associated with increased mean panel size (120 vs. 137.6; p ≤ 0.001), decreased continuity of care (63 % vs. 48 % from provider perspective; 61 % vs. 51 % from patient perspective; p ≤ 0.001 for both; team continuity was preserved), decreased missed appointments (12.5 % vs. 10.9 %; p ≤ 0.01), improved perceived safety and teamwork (3.6 vs. 4.1 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), improved mean teaching conference attendance (57.1 vs. 64.4; p ≤ 0.001), improved resident clinic performance (3.6 vs. 3.9 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), and little change in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although this model requires further study in other settings, these results suggest that a 50/50 model may allow residents to manage more patients while enhancing the climate of teamwork and safety in the continuity clinic, compared to traditional models. Future work should explore ways to preserve continuity of care within this model.

AB - BACKGROUND: There have been recent calls for improved internal medicine outpatient training, yet assessment of clinical and educational variables within existing models is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 outpatient-inpatient model on clinical and educational outcomes. DESIGN: Pre-intervention and post-intervention study intervals, comparing the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 academic years. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six residents in a Primary Care Internal Medicine site of a large academic internal medicine residency program who provide care for > 13,000 patients. INTERVENTION: Continuity clinic redesign from a traditional weekly clinic model to a 50/50 model characterized by 50 % outpatient and 50 % inpatient experiences scheduled in alternating 1 month blocks, with twice weekly continuity clinic during outpatient months and no clinic during inpatient months. MAIN MEASURES: 1) Clinical outcomes (panel size, patient visits, adherence with chronic disease and preventive service guidelines, continuity of care, patient satisfaction, and perceived safety/teamwork in clinic); 2) Educational outcomes (attendance at teaching conference, resident and faculty satisfaction, faculty assessment of resident clinic performance, and residents' perceived preparedness for outpatient management). RESULTS: Redesign was associated with increased mean panel size (120 vs. 137.6; p ≤ 0.001), decreased continuity of care (63 % vs. 48 % from provider perspective; 61 % vs. 51 % from patient perspective; p ≤ 0.001 for both; team continuity was preserved), decreased missed appointments (12.5 % vs. 10.9 %; p ≤ 0.01), improved perceived safety and teamwork (3.6 vs. 4.1 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), improved mean teaching conference attendance (57.1 vs. 64.4; p ≤ 0.001), improved resident clinic performance (3.6 vs. 3.9 on 5-point scale; p ≤ 0.001), and little change in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although this model requires further study in other settings, these results suggest that a 50/50 model may allow residents to manage more patients while enhancing the climate of teamwork and safety in the continuity clinic, compared to traditional models. Future work should explore ways to preserve continuity of care within this model.

KW - continuity clinic

KW - graduate medical education

KW - outcomes research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880513561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880513561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-012-2312-1

DO - 10.1007/s11606-012-2312-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 23595923

AN - SCOPUS:84880513561

VL - 28

SP - 1014

EP - 1019

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -