ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease

James P. Earls, Pamela K. Woodard, Suhny Abbara, Scott R. Akers, Philip A Araoz, Kristopher Cummings, Ricardo C. Cury, Sharmila Dorbala, Udo Hoffmann, Joe Y. Hsu, Jill E. Jacobs, James K. Min

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Coronary artery disease has a long asymptomatic latent period and early targeted preventive measures can reduce mortality and morbidity. It is important to accurately classify individuals at elevated risk in order to identify those who might benefit from early intervention. Imaging advances have made it possible to detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score correlates closely with overall atherosclerotic burden and provides useful prognostic information for patient management. Our purpose is to discuss use of diagnostic imaging in asymptomatic patients at elevated risk for future cardiovascular events. The goal for these patients is to further refine targeted preventative efforts based on risk. The following imaging modalities are available for evaluating asymptomatic patients at elevated risk: radiography, fluoroscopy, multidetector CT, ultrasound, MRI, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography, and PET. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-19
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Disease
Guidelines
Information Management
Perfusion Imaging
Fluoroscopy
Expert Testimony
Diagnostic Imaging
Radiography
Echocardiography
Cause of Death
Coronary Vessels
Cardiovascular Diseases
Calcium
Morbidity
Mortality
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Appropriateness criteria
  • asymptomatic
  • coronary artery calcium score
  • coronary artery disease
  • multidetector CT (MDCT)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease. / Earls, James P.; Woodard, Pamela K.; Abbara, Suhny; Akers, Scott R.; Araoz, Philip A; Cummings, Kristopher; Cury, Ricardo C.; Dorbala, Sharmila; Hoffmann, Udo; Hsu, Joe Y.; Jacobs, Jill E.; Min, James K.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2014, p. 12-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Earls, JP, Woodard, PK, Abbara, S, Akers, SR, Araoz, PA, Cummings, K, Cury, RC, Dorbala, S, Hoffmann, U, Hsu, JY, Jacobs, JE & Min, JK 2014, 'ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.021
Earls, James P. ; Woodard, Pamela K. ; Abbara, Suhny ; Akers, Scott R. ; Araoz, Philip A ; Cummings, Kristopher ; Cury, Ricardo C. ; Dorbala, Sharmila ; Hoffmann, Udo ; Hsu, Joe Y. ; Jacobs, Jill E. ; Min, James K. / ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 12-19.
@article{fa87ffb9f2114d9fa11c5f7accde2ded,
title = "ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease",
abstract = "Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Coronary artery disease has a long asymptomatic latent period and early targeted preventive measures can reduce mortality and morbidity. It is important to accurately classify individuals at elevated risk in order to identify those who might benefit from early intervention. Imaging advances have made it possible to detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score correlates closely with overall atherosclerotic burden and provides useful prognostic information for patient management. Our purpose is to discuss use of diagnostic imaging in asymptomatic patients at elevated risk for future cardiovascular events. The goal for these patients is to further refine targeted preventative efforts based on risk. The following imaging modalities are available for evaluating asymptomatic patients at elevated risk: radiography, fluoroscopy, multidetector CT, ultrasound, MRI, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography, and PET. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.",
keywords = "Appropriateness criteria, asymptomatic, coronary artery calcium score, coronary artery disease, multidetector CT (MDCT)",
author = "Earls, {James P.} and Woodard, {Pamela K.} and Suhny Abbara and Akers, {Scott R.} and Araoz, {Philip A} and Kristopher Cummings and Cury, {Ricardo C.} and Sharmila Dorbala and Udo Hoffmann and Hsu, {Joe Y.} and Jacobs, {Jill E.} and Min, {James K.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "12--19",
journal = "JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease

AU - Earls, James P.

AU - Woodard, Pamela K.

AU - Abbara, Suhny

AU - Akers, Scott R.

AU - Araoz, Philip A

AU - Cummings, Kristopher

AU - Cury, Ricardo C.

AU - Dorbala, Sharmila

AU - Hoffmann, Udo

AU - Hsu, Joe Y.

AU - Jacobs, Jill E.

AU - Min, James K.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Coronary artery disease has a long asymptomatic latent period and early targeted preventive measures can reduce mortality and morbidity. It is important to accurately classify individuals at elevated risk in order to identify those who might benefit from early intervention. Imaging advances have made it possible to detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score correlates closely with overall atherosclerotic burden and provides useful prognostic information for patient management. Our purpose is to discuss use of diagnostic imaging in asymptomatic patients at elevated risk for future cardiovascular events. The goal for these patients is to further refine targeted preventative efforts based on risk. The following imaging modalities are available for evaluating asymptomatic patients at elevated risk: radiography, fluoroscopy, multidetector CT, ultrasound, MRI, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography, and PET. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

AB - Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States. Coronary artery disease has a long asymptomatic latent period and early targeted preventive measures can reduce mortality and morbidity. It is important to accurately classify individuals at elevated risk in order to identify those who might benefit from early intervention. Imaging advances have made it possible to detect subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Coronary artery calcium score correlates closely with overall atherosclerotic burden and provides useful prognostic information for patient management. Our purpose is to discuss use of diagnostic imaging in asymptomatic patients at elevated risk for future cardiovascular events. The goal for these patients is to further refine targeted preventative efforts based on risk. The following imaging modalities are available for evaluating asymptomatic patients at elevated risk: radiography, fluoroscopy, multidetector CT, ultrasound, MRI, cardiac perfusion scintigraphy, echocardiography, and PET. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

KW - Appropriateness criteria

KW - asymptomatic

KW - coronary artery calcium score

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - multidetector CT (MDCT)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891744546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891744546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.021

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 12

EP - 19

JO - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - JACR Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 1

ER -