TY - JOUR
T1 - ACG Clinical Guideline
T2 - Gastroparesis
AU - Camilleri, Michael
AU - Kuo, Braden
AU - Nguyen, Linda
AU - Vaughn, Vida M.
AU - Petrey, Jessica
AU - Greer, Katarina
AU - Yadlapati, Rena
AU - Abell, Thomas L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggesting retention of food in the stomach with objective evidence of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction in the gastric outflow. This condition is increasingly encountered in clinical practice. These guidelines summarize perspectives on the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis in adults (including dietary, pharmacological, device, and interventions directed at the pylorus), and they represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process. When the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, we used expert consensus to develop key concept statements. These guidelines should be considered as preferred but are not the only approaches to these conditions.
AB - Gastroparesis is characterized by symptoms suggesting retention of food in the stomach with objective evidence of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction in the gastric outflow. This condition is increasingly encountered in clinical practice. These guidelines summarize perspectives on the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of gastroparesis in adults (including dietary, pharmacological, device, and interventions directed at the pylorus), and they represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation process. When the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, we used expert consensus to develop key concept statements. These guidelines should be considered as preferred but are not the only approaches to these conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135434884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135434884&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001874
DO - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001874
M3 - Article
C2 - 35926490
AN - SCOPUS:85135434884
SN - 0002-9270
VL - 117
SP - 1197
EP - 1220
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
IS - 8
ER -