Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing

A comparison of two techniques

Jonathan T. Finnoff, Phillip T. Henning, Sarah K. Cederholm, John H. Hollman, Jay Smith, Norman S. Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Foot compartment syndrome is diagnosed with intracompartmental pressure measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of two techniques to accurately place a needle tip within the medial foot compartment and to compare the proximity of the needle tip to the medial foot compartment neurovascular structures between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a laboratory study using ten unembalmed cadaveric ankle-foot specimens. Two 18-gauge side-ported needles were placed into the medial foot compartments of each cadaveric specimen utilizing two separate techniques (Mollica and Reach techniques). Ultrasound was used to confirm needle tip placement within the medial foot compartment and needle proximity to the neurovascular structures. Results: Both needle placement techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment. However, the distance between the needle tip and the neurovascular structures of the medial foot compartment was significantly closer (p = 0.037) using the Mollica technique (mean = 3.9 mm ± 2.2 mm) than the Reach technique (mean = 10.9 mm ± 5.2 mm). Neither needle placement technique perforated the medial foot neurovascular structures. Conclusion: While both medial foot compartment pressure techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment, the needle tip was significantly further from the medial foot neurovascular structures using the Reach technique than the Mollica technique. The Reach technique involves inserting the needle 6 cm below the distal tip of the medial malleolus, and advancing it 1 cm in a medial to lateral direction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1001-1005
Number of pages5
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Needles
Foot
Pressure
Compartment Syndromes
Ankle

Keywords

  • Compartment syndromes
  • Foot
  • Surgical diagnostic techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Finnoff, J. T., Henning, P. T., Cederholm, S. K., Hollman, J. H., Smith, J., & Turner, N. S. (2010). Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing: A comparison of two techniques. Foot and Ankle International, 31(11), 1001-1005. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.1001

Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing : A comparison of two techniques. / Finnoff, Jonathan T.; Henning, Phillip T.; Cederholm, Sarah K.; Hollman, John H.; Smith, Jay; Turner, Norman S.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 31, No. 11, 01.11.2010, p. 1001-1005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Finnoff, JT, Henning, PT, Cederholm, SK, Hollman, JH, Smith, J & Turner, NS 2010, 'Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing: A comparison of two techniques', Foot and Ankle International, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1001-1005. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.1001
Finnoff, Jonathan T. ; Henning, Phillip T. ; Cederholm, Sarah K. ; Hollman, John H. ; Smith, Jay ; Turner, Norman S. / Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing : A comparison of two techniques. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2010 ; Vol. 31, No. 11. pp. 1001-1005.
@article{44b4e04e881a4963acf6d97d3bd83bcd,
title = "Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing: A comparison of two techniques",
abstract = "Background: Foot compartment syndrome is diagnosed with intracompartmental pressure measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of two techniques to accurately place a needle tip within the medial foot compartment and to compare the proximity of the needle tip to the medial foot compartment neurovascular structures between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a laboratory study using ten unembalmed cadaveric ankle-foot specimens. Two 18-gauge side-ported needles were placed into the medial foot compartments of each cadaveric specimen utilizing two separate techniques (Mollica and Reach techniques). Ultrasound was used to confirm needle tip placement within the medial foot compartment and needle proximity to the neurovascular structures. Results: Both needle placement techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment. However, the distance between the needle tip and the neurovascular structures of the medial foot compartment was significantly closer (p = 0.037) using the Mollica technique (mean = 3.9 mm ± 2.2 mm) than the Reach technique (mean = 10.9 mm ± 5.2 mm). Neither needle placement technique perforated the medial foot neurovascular structures. Conclusion: While both medial foot compartment pressure techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment, the needle tip was significantly further from the medial foot neurovascular structures using the Reach technique than the Mollica technique. The Reach technique involves inserting the needle 6 cm below the distal tip of the medial malleolus, and advancing it 1 cm in a medial to lateral direction.",
keywords = "Compartment syndromes, Foot, Surgical diagnostic techniques",
author = "Finnoff, {Jonathan T.} and Henning, {Phillip T.} and Cederholm, {Sarah K.} and Hollman, {John H.} and Jay Smith and Turner, {Norman S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3113/FAI.2010.1001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "1001--1005",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of medial foot compartment pressure testing

T2 - A comparison of two techniques

AU - Finnoff, Jonathan T.

AU - Henning, Phillip T.

AU - Cederholm, Sarah K.

AU - Hollman, John H.

AU - Smith, Jay

AU - Turner, Norman S.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Background: Foot compartment syndrome is diagnosed with intracompartmental pressure measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of two techniques to accurately place a needle tip within the medial foot compartment and to compare the proximity of the needle tip to the medial foot compartment neurovascular structures between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a laboratory study using ten unembalmed cadaveric ankle-foot specimens. Two 18-gauge side-ported needles were placed into the medial foot compartments of each cadaveric specimen utilizing two separate techniques (Mollica and Reach techniques). Ultrasound was used to confirm needle tip placement within the medial foot compartment and needle proximity to the neurovascular structures. Results: Both needle placement techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment. However, the distance between the needle tip and the neurovascular structures of the medial foot compartment was significantly closer (p = 0.037) using the Mollica technique (mean = 3.9 mm ± 2.2 mm) than the Reach technique (mean = 10.9 mm ± 5.2 mm). Neither needle placement technique perforated the medial foot neurovascular structures. Conclusion: While both medial foot compartment pressure techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment, the needle tip was significantly further from the medial foot neurovascular structures using the Reach technique than the Mollica technique. The Reach technique involves inserting the needle 6 cm below the distal tip of the medial malleolus, and advancing it 1 cm in a medial to lateral direction.

AB - Background: Foot compartment syndrome is diagnosed with intracompartmental pressure measurements. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of two techniques to accurately place a needle tip within the medial foot compartment and to compare the proximity of the needle tip to the medial foot compartment neurovascular structures between the two techniques. Materials and Methods: This was a laboratory study using ten unembalmed cadaveric ankle-foot specimens. Two 18-gauge side-ported needles were placed into the medial foot compartments of each cadaveric specimen utilizing two separate techniques (Mollica and Reach techniques). Ultrasound was used to confirm needle tip placement within the medial foot compartment and needle proximity to the neurovascular structures. Results: Both needle placement techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment. However, the distance between the needle tip and the neurovascular structures of the medial foot compartment was significantly closer (p = 0.037) using the Mollica technique (mean = 3.9 mm ± 2.2 mm) than the Reach technique (mean = 10.9 mm ± 5.2 mm). Neither needle placement technique perforated the medial foot neurovascular structures. Conclusion: While both medial foot compartment pressure techniques accurately placed the needle tip within the medial foot compartment, the needle tip was significantly further from the medial foot neurovascular structures using the Reach technique than the Mollica technique. The Reach technique involves inserting the needle 6 cm below the distal tip of the medial malleolus, and advancing it 1 cm in a medial to lateral direction.

KW - Compartment syndromes

KW - Foot

KW - Surgical diagnostic techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649847096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649847096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3113/FAI.2010.1001

DO - 10.3113/FAI.2010.1001

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1001

EP - 1005

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 11

ER -