Absent and Discordant Electronic Health Record Documentation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Care

Daniela L. Stan, Dietlind Wahner-Roedler, Kathleen J. Yost, Thomas Jamie O'Byrne, Megan E. Branda, Aaron L. Leppin, Jon C. Tilburt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Many patients with cancer use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), but the quality of CAM documentation in their electronic health records (EHRs) is unknown. The authors aimed to describe (i) the prevalence and types of CAM used after cancer diagnosis and the influence of oncologists on CAM use, as per patients' self-report, and (ii) the prevalence of CAM documentation in the EHR and its consistency with self-reported usage. Design: Patient and provider surveys and chart review. Settings/Location: Medical oncology practices at one institution. Subjects: Patients with cancer at oncologist visits. Outcome measures: Patient self-reported rate of 3-month postvisit CAM use; provider EHR documentation of CAM use or discussion and its concordance with patient self-report. Results: Among 327 patients enrolled, 248 responded to the 3-month postvisit survey. Of these, 158 reported CAM use after diagnosis (63.7%). CAM users were younger (p < 0.001) and had a higher percentage of women (p = 0.03) than nonusers. Modalities most commonly used were supplements (62.6%), special diets (38.6%), chiropractor (28.4%), and massage (28.4%). CAM was used to improve well-being (68.7%), manage adverse effects (35.5%), and fight cancer (22.9%). Oncologists suggested CAM in 22.5% of instances of use. CAM use/discussion was documented for 58.2% of self-reported CAM users. Of the documented modalities, EHR and self-report were concordant for only 8.2%. CAM documentation was associated with physician provider (p = 0.03), older patients (p = 0.01), and treatment with radiation (p = 0.03) or surgery (p = 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, patients with breast cancer or "other" tumor category were four times more likely than patients with gastrointestinal cancer to have CAM use documentation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.41 [1.48-13.10]; 3.76 [1.42-9.99], respectively). Conclusions: Most patients with cancer use CAM after diagnosis, yet EHR documentation is complete for very few. Oncologists should inquire about, document, and discuss CAM benefits and harm or refer patients to CAM specialists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)988-995
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume24
Issue number9-10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Keywords

  • CAM
  • complementary and alternative medicine
  • EHR, oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Absent and Discordant Electronic Health Record Documentation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this