A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors

T. G. Mullaney, Amy Lightner, M. Johnston, S. R. Kelley, David Larson, Eric Dozois

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18–89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic–perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1–8 and 2–10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5–71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-263
Number of pages9
JournalTechniques in Coloproctology
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Neoplasms
Robotics
Morbidity
Length of Stay
Recurrence
Laparotomy
Patient Selection
Publications
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Colorectal/anal neoplasia
  • Laparoscopic
  • Minimally invasive surgery
  • Retrorectal tumors
  • Robotic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors. / Mullaney, T. G.; Lightner, Amy; Johnston, M.; Kelley, S. R.; Larson, David; Dozois, Eric.

In: Techniques in Coloproctology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 255-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Mullaney, T. G. ; Lightner, Amy ; Johnston, M. ; Kelley, S. R. ; Larson, David ; Dozois, Eric. / A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors. In: Techniques in Coloproctology. 2018 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 255-263.
@article{b474fb5adae94a6fa2382aacc79250ca,
title = "A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors",
abstract = "Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2{\%}), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18–89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0{\%}) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic–perineal resection, and 9 (10.8{\%}) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5{\%}. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7{\%}, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2{\%}). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1–8 and 2–10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5–71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.",
keywords = "Colorectal/anal neoplasia, Laparoscopic, Minimally invasive surgery, Retrorectal tumors, Robotic",
author = "Mullaney, {T. G.} and Amy Lightner and M. Johnston and Kelley, {S. R.} and David Larson and Eric Dozois",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10151-018-1781-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "255--263",
journal = "Techniques in Coloproctology",
issn = "1123-6337",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors

AU - Mullaney, T. G.

AU - Lightner, Amy

AU - Johnston, M.

AU - Kelley, S. R.

AU - Larson, David

AU - Dozois, Eric

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18–89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic–perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1–8 and 2–10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5–71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.

AB - Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18–89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic–perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1–8 and 2–10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5–71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.

KW - Colorectal/anal neoplasia

KW - Laparoscopic

KW - Minimally invasive surgery

KW - Retrorectal tumors

KW - Robotic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045731721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045731721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10151-018-1781-6

DO - 10.1007/s10151-018-1781-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29679245

AN - SCOPUS:85045731721

VL - 22

SP - 255

EP - 263

JO - Techniques in Coloproctology

JF - Techniques in Coloproctology

SN - 1123-6337

IS - 4

ER -