A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population

Avinash K. Nehra, Matthew T. Gettman, Marcelino E. Rivera, Deepak K. Agarwal, Daniel A. O'Neil, Sarah M. Jenkins, Matthew K. Tollefson, Boyd R. Viers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Through real-time monitoring of biophysical parameters, physical activity monitors may represent a medium by which urologists can actively engage patients and improve treatment outcomes. We examined patient reported acceptance of physical activity monitor technology in an ambulatory urology setting. Methods: Patients treated at a single urology department during a 6-month period were identified. A web based survey was conducted evaluating patient characteristics and acceptance of physical activity monitors. Results: A total of 1,043 (19%) patients completed the survey, of whom 210 (20%) reported using physical activity monitors for health and wellness. Overall 854 (82%) respondents were willing to use these devices for urological care. Compared to patients who disagreed, those willing to use physical activity monitors for medical care reported greater perceived medical benefit (86% vs 14%), improved communication (85% vs 26%), confidentiality (89% vs 45%), less interference with daily activity (4% vs 55%) and improved health (81% vs 13%, all p <0.0001). Benefits and usefulness among accepting patients included health monitoring convenience (82%), goal related feedback (82%), ease of communication (57%) and monitoring of post-procedure recovery (56%). After controlling for associated patient characteristics, the degree of perceived burden, medical benefit, health improvement and enhancement in communication were modifiable, and independently associated with physical activity monitor acceptance. Conclusions: There is a high level of acceptance for wearable technology among urology patients. This may have significant implications for improving patient engagement, perioperative care pathways and surgical outcomes. Finally, these findings may assist urologists in directing future efforts to clinically integrate physical activity monitors to enhance patient acceptance and potential outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalUrology Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology
Exercise
Population
Urology
Communication
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Technology
Perioperative Care
Patient Participation
Confidentiality
Insurance Benefits
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Feedback
  • Fitness trackers
  • Monitoring
  • Perception
  • Physiologic
  • Urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Nehra, A. K., Gettman, M. T., Rivera, M. E., Agarwal, D. K., O'Neil, D. A., Jenkins, S. M., ... Viers, B. R. (Accepted/In press). A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population. Urology Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2016.10.002

A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population. / Nehra, Avinash K.; Gettman, Matthew T.; Rivera, Marcelino E.; Agarwal, Deepak K.; O'Neil, Daniel A.; Jenkins, Sarah M.; Tollefson, Matthew K.; Viers, Boyd R.

In: Urology Practice, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nehra, Avinash K. ; Gettman, Matthew T. ; Rivera, Marcelino E. ; Agarwal, Deepak K. ; O'Neil, Daniel A. ; Jenkins, Sarah M. ; Tollefson, Matthew K. ; Viers, Boyd R. / A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population. In: Urology Practice. 2017.
@article{74b44df75ccb4eb39b91842736686e81,
title = "A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population",
abstract = "Introduction: Through real-time monitoring of biophysical parameters, physical activity monitors may represent a medium by which urologists can actively engage patients and improve treatment outcomes. We examined patient reported acceptance of physical activity monitor technology in an ambulatory urology setting. Methods: Patients treated at a single urology department during a 6-month period were identified. A web based survey was conducted evaluating patient characteristics and acceptance of physical activity monitors. Results: A total of 1,043 (19{\%}) patients completed the survey, of whom 210 (20{\%}) reported using physical activity monitors for health and wellness. Overall 854 (82{\%}) respondents were willing to use these devices for urological care. Compared to patients who disagreed, those willing to use physical activity monitors for medical care reported greater perceived medical benefit (86{\%} vs 14{\%}), improved communication (85{\%} vs 26{\%}), confidentiality (89{\%} vs 45{\%}), less interference with daily activity (4{\%} vs 55{\%}) and improved health (81{\%} vs 13{\%}, all p <0.0001). Benefits and usefulness among accepting patients included health monitoring convenience (82{\%}), goal related feedback (82{\%}), ease of communication (57{\%}) and monitoring of post-procedure recovery (56{\%}). After controlling for associated patient characteristics, the degree of perceived burden, medical benefit, health improvement and enhancement in communication were modifiable, and independently associated with physical activity monitor acceptance. Conclusions: There is a high level of acceptance for wearable technology among urology patients. This may have significant implications for improving patient engagement, perioperative care pathways and surgical outcomes. Finally, these findings may assist urologists in directing future efforts to clinically integrate physical activity monitors to enhance patient acceptance and potential outcomes.",
keywords = "Feedback, Fitness trackers, Monitoring, Perception, Physiologic, Urology",
author = "Nehra, {Avinash K.} and Gettman, {Matthew T.} and Rivera, {Marcelino E.} and Agarwal, {Deepak K.} and O'Neil, {Daniel A.} and Jenkins, {Sarah M.} and Tollefson, {Matthew K.} and Viers, {Boyd R.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.urpr.2016.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Urology Practice",
issn = "2352-0779",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Survey of Perceptions and Acceptance of Wearable Technology for Health Monitoring in a Urological Patient Population

AU - Nehra, Avinash K.

AU - Gettman, Matthew T.

AU - Rivera, Marcelino E.

AU - Agarwal, Deepak K.

AU - O'Neil, Daniel A.

AU - Jenkins, Sarah M.

AU - Tollefson, Matthew K.

AU - Viers, Boyd R.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction: Through real-time monitoring of biophysical parameters, physical activity monitors may represent a medium by which urologists can actively engage patients and improve treatment outcomes. We examined patient reported acceptance of physical activity monitor technology in an ambulatory urology setting. Methods: Patients treated at a single urology department during a 6-month period were identified. A web based survey was conducted evaluating patient characteristics and acceptance of physical activity monitors. Results: A total of 1,043 (19%) patients completed the survey, of whom 210 (20%) reported using physical activity monitors for health and wellness. Overall 854 (82%) respondents were willing to use these devices for urological care. Compared to patients who disagreed, those willing to use physical activity monitors for medical care reported greater perceived medical benefit (86% vs 14%), improved communication (85% vs 26%), confidentiality (89% vs 45%), less interference with daily activity (4% vs 55%) and improved health (81% vs 13%, all p <0.0001). Benefits and usefulness among accepting patients included health monitoring convenience (82%), goal related feedback (82%), ease of communication (57%) and monitoring of post-procedure recovery (56%). After controlling for associated patient characteristics, the degree of perceived burden, medical benefit, health improvement and enhancement in communication were modifiable, and independently associated with physical activity monitor acceptance. Conclusions: There is a high level of acceptance for wearable technology among urology patients. This may have significant implications for improving patient engagement, perioperative care pathways and surgical outcomes. Finally, these findings may assist urologists in directing future efforts to clinically integrate physical activity monitors to enhance patient acceptance and potential outcomes.

AB - Introduction: Through real-time monitoring of biophysical parameters, physical activity monitors may represent a medium by which urologists can actively engage patients and improve treatment outcomes. We examined patient reported acceptance of physical activity monitor technology in an ambulatory urology setting. Methods: Patients treated at a single urology department during a 6-month period were identified. A web based survey was conducted evaluating patient characteristics and acceptance of physical activity monitors. Results: A total of 1,043 (19%) patients completed the survey, of whom 210 (20%) reported using physical activity monitors for health and wellness. Overall 854 (82%) respondents were willing to use these devices for urological care. Compared to patients who disagreed, those willing to use physical activity monitors for medical care reported greater perceived medical benefit (86% vs 14%), improved communication (85% vs 26%), confidentiality (89% vs 45%), less interference with daily activity (4% vs 55%) and improved health (81% vs 13%, all p <0.0001). Benefits and usefulness among accepting patients included health monitoring convenience (82%), goal related feedback (82%), ease of communication (57%) and monitoring of post-procedure recovery (56%). After controlling for associated patient characteristics, the degree of perceived burden, medical benefit, health improvement and enhancement in communication were modifiable, and independently associated with physical activity monitor acceptance. Conclusions: There is a high level of acceptance for wearable technology among urology patients. This may have significant implications for improving patient engagement, perioperative care pathways and surgical outcomes. Finally, these findings may assist urologists in directing future efforts to clinically integrate physical activity monitors to enhance patient acceptance and potential outcomes.

KW - Feedback

KW - Fitness trackers

KW - Monitoring

KW - Perception

KW - Physiologic

KW - Urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030321326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030321326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030321326

JO - Urology Practice

JF - Urology Practice

SN - 2352-0779

ER -