Abstract
A solid breast mass that decreases in size over time without treatment is generally felt to be inconsistent with a diagnosis of malignancy. We describe a case where this dogma proves to be incorrect. Mammographic features of a mass, along with the patient's clinical hormonal status, need to be considered along with size characteristics.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 68-72 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Radiology Case Reports |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2006 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging