A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Yogesh N.V. Reddy, Rickey E. Carter, Masaru Obokata, Margaret May Redfield, Barry A Borlaug

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in euvolemic patients with dyspnea, and no evidence-based criteria are available. We sought to develop and then validate noninvasive diagnostic criteria that could be used to estimate the likelihood that HFpEF is present among patients with unexplained dyspnea to guide further testing.

METHODS: Consecutive patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for invasive hemodynamic exercise testing were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF (case) or noncardiac dyspnea (control) was ascertained by invasive hemodynamic exercise testing. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of clinical findings to discriminate cases from controls. A scoring system was developed and then validated in a separate test cohort.

RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 414 consecutive patients (267 cases with HFpEF and 147 controls; HFpEF prevalence, 64%). The test cohort included 100 consecutive patients (61 with HFpEF; prevalence, 61%). Obesity, atrial fibrillation, age >60 years, treatment with ≥2 antihypertensives, echocardiographic E/e' ratio >9, and echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mm Hg were selected as the final set of predictive variables. A weighted score based on these 6 variables was used to create a composite score (H2FPEF score) ranging from 0 to 9. The odds of HFpEF doubled for each 1-unit score increase (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.74-2.30; P<0.0001), with an area under the curve of 0.841 ( P<0.0001). The H2FPEF score was superior to a currently used algorithm based on expert consensus (increase in area under the curve of 0.169; 95% CI, 0.120-0.217; P<0.0001). Performance in the independent test cohort was maintained (area under the curve, 0.886; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score, which relies on simple clinical characteristics and echocardiography, enables discrimination of HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea and can assist in determination of the need for further diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)861-870
Number of pages10
JournalCirculation
Volume138
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 28 2018

Fingerprint

Heart Failure
Dyspnea
Area Under Curve
Hemodynamics
Exercise
Atrial Fibrillation
Antihypertensive Agents
Pulmonary Artery
Echocardiography
Obesity
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • catheterization
  • exercise test
  • heart failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. / Reddy, Yogesh N.V.; Carter, Rickey E.; Obokata, Masaru; Redfield, Margaret May; Borlaug, Barry A.

In: Circulation, Vol. 138, No. 9, 28.08.2018, p. 861-870.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{626556d0260046b980046e0befa05867,
title = "A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in euvolemic patients with dyspnea, and no evidence-based criteria are available. We sought to develop and then validate noninvasive diagnostic criteria that could be used to estimate the likelihood that HFpEF is present among patients with unexplained dyspnea to guide further testing.METHODS: Consecutive patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for invasive hemodynamic exercise testing were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF (case) or noncardiac dyspnea (control) was ascertained by invasive hemodynamic exercise testing. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of clinical findings to discriminate cases from controls. A scoring system was developed and then validated in a separate test cohort.RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 414 consecutive patients (267 cases with HFpEF and 147 controls; HFpEF prevalence, 64{\%}). The test cohort included 100 consecutive patients (61 with HFpEF; prevalence, 61{\%}). Obesity, atrial fibrillation, age >60 years, treatment with ≥2 antihypertensives, echocardiographic E/e' ratio >9, and echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mm Hg were selected as the final set of predictive variables. A weighted score based on these 6 variables was used to create a composite score (H2FPEF score) ranging from 0 to 9. The odds of HFpEF doubled for each 1-unit score increase (odds ratio, 1.98; 95{\%} CI, 1.74-2.30; P<0.0001), with an area under the curve of 0.841 ( P<0.0001). The H2FPEF score was superior to a currently used algorithm based on expert consensus (increase in area under the curve of 0.169; 95{\%} CI, 0.120-0.217; P<0.0001). Performance in the independent test cohort was maintained (area under the curve, 0.886; P<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score, which relies on simple clinical characteristics and echocardiography, enables discrimination of HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea and can assist in determination of the need for further diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.",
keywords = "catheterization, exercise test, heart failure",
author = "Reddy, {Yogesh N.V.} and Carter, {Rickey E.} and Masaru Obokata and Redfield, {Margaret May} and Borlaug, {Barry A}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "861--870",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Simple, Evidence-Based Approach to Help Guide Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

AU - Reddy, Yogesh N.V.

AU - Carter, Rickey E.

AU - Obokata, Masaru

AU - Redfield, Margaret May

AU - Borlaug, Barry A

PY - 2018/8/28

Y1 - 2018/8/28

N2 - BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in euvolemic patients with dyspnea, and no evidence-based criteria are available. We sought to develop and then validate noninvasive diagnostic criteria that could be used to estimate the likelihood that HFpEF is present among patients with unexplained dyspnea to guide further testing.METHODS: Consecutive patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for invasive hemodynamic exercise testing were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF (case) or noncardiac dyspnea (control) was ascertained by invasive hemodynamic exercise testing. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of clinical findings to discriminate cases from controls. A scoring system was developed and then validated in a separate test cohort.RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 414 consecutive patients (267 cases with HFpEF and 147 controls; HFpEF prevalence, 64%). The test cohort included 100 consecutive patients (61 with HFpEF; prevalence, 61%). Obesity, atrial fibrillation, age >60 years, treatment with ≥2 antihypertensives, echocardiographic E/e' ratio >9, and echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mm Hg were selected as the final set of predictive variables. A weighted score based on these 6 variables was used to create a composite score (H2FPEF score) ranging from 0 to 9. The odds of HFpEF doubled for each 1-unit score increase (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.74-2.30; P<0.0001), with an area under the curve of 0.841 ( P<0.0001). The H2FPEF score was superior to a currently used algorithm based on expert consensus (increase in area under the curve of 0.169; 95% CI, 0.120-0.217; P<0.0001). Performance in the independent test cohort was maintained (area under the curve, 0.886; P<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score, which relies on simple clinical characteristics and echocardiography, enables discrimination of HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea and can assist in determination of the need for further diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.

AB - BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in euvolemic patients with dyspnea, and no evidence-based criteria are available. We sought to develop and then validate noninvasive diagnostic criteria that could be used to estimate the likelihood that HFpEF is present among patients with unexplained dyspnea to guide further testing.METHODS: Consecutive patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for invasive hemodynamic exercise testing were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis of HFpEF (case) or noncardiac dyspnea (control) was ascertained by invasive hemodynamic exercise testing. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the ability of clinical findings to discriminate cases from controls. A scoring system was developed and then validated in a separate test cohort.RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 414 consecutive patients (267 cases with HFpEF and 147 controls; HFpEF prevalence, 64%). The test cohort included 100 consecutive patients (61 with HFpEF; prevalence, 61%). Obesity, atrial fibrillation, age >60 years, treatment with ≥2 antihypertensives, echocardiographic E/e' ratio >9, and echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure >35 mm Hg were selected as the final set of predictive variables. A weighted score based on these 6 variables was used to create a composite score (H2FPEF score) ranging from 0 to 9. The odds of HFpEF doubled for each 1-unit score increase (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.74-2.30; P<0.0001), with an area under the curve of 0.841 ( P<0.0001). The H2FPEF score was superior to a currently used algorithm based on expert consensus (increase in area under the curve of 0.169; 95% CI, 0.120-0.217; P<0.0001). Performance in the independent test cohort was maintained (area under the curve, 0.886; P<0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: The H2FPEF score, which relies on simple clinical characteristics and echocardiography, enables discrimination of HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea and can assist in determination of the need for further diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients with unexplained exertional dyspnea.

KW - catheterization

KW - exercise test

KW - heart failure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050153568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050153568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646

DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034646

M3 - Article

C2 - 29792299

AN - SCOPUS:85050153568

VL - 138

SP - 861

EP - 870

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 9

ER -