TY - JOUR
T1 - A quantitative alternative to the Goutallier classification system using Lava Flex and Ideal MRI techniques
T2 - volumetric intramuscular fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle, a cadaveric study
AU - Trevino, Jose H.
AU - Gorny, Krzysztof R.
AU - Gomez-Cintron, Angel
AU - Zhao, Chunfeng
AU - Giambini, Hugo
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded internally by the University of Texas at San Antonio and an award from the Mayo Clinic.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB).
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Objective: The Goutallier classification system is the most commonly used method for grading intramuscular fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears. This grading system presents low inter-observer reliability and an inability to provide quantitative and repeatable outcomes for intramuscular fat. We determined the correlation and reliability of two methods, the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI techniques, in quantifying volumetric intramuscular fat, while also comparing to the Goutallier method. Materials and methods: The supraspinatus muscles of seventeen cadaveric shoulders were scanned using the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI imaging protocols. Histological analysis was performed on the same muscles. Agreement, reliability, and correlation analyses were performed to compare all outcomes. Results: The Lava Flex protocol took an average of ~ 4 min, while the Ideal IQ required about ~ 11 min to complete. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ [LOA (− 0.10 and 0.05)], and ICC analyses showed excellent reliability (ICC (1,1) 0.948; ICC (2,1) 0.947). There was a 91% correlation between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MR protocols. Weighted Kappa analysis between histology and the Goutallier classification showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Discussion: The Lava Flex technique, taking about 30% of the acquisition time, may prevent motion artifacts in outcomes associated with the longer Ideal IQ technique. However, potential magnetic field inhomogeneities should be considered. The Lava Flex technique may be a faster and valid alternative to the Goutallier classification system.
AB - Objective: The Goutallier classification system is the most commonly used method for grading intramuscular fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears. This grading system presents low inter-observer reliability and an inability to provide quantitative and repeatable outcomes for intramuscular fat. We determined the correlation and reliability of two methods, the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI techniques, in quantifying volumetric intramuscular fat, while also comparing to the Goutallier method. Materials and methods: The supraspinatus muscles of seventeen cadaveric shoulders were scanned using the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MRI imaging protocols. Histological analysis was performed on the same muscles. Agreement, reliability, and correlation analyses were performed to compare all outcomes. Results: The Lava Flex protocol took an average of ~ 4 min, while the Ideal IQ required about ~ 11 min to complete. Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ [LOA (− 0.10 and 0.05)], and ICC analyses showed excellent reliability (ICC (1,1) 0.948; ICC (2,1) 0.947). There was a 91% correlation between the Lava Flex and Ideal IQ MR protocols. Weighted Kappa analysis between histology and the Goutallier classification showed fair-to-moderate agreement. Discussion: The Lava Flex technique, taking about 30% of the acquisition time, may prevent motion artifacts in outcomes associated with the longer Ideal IQ technique. However, potential magnetic field inhomogeneities should be considered. The Lava Flex technique may be a faster and valid alternative to the Goutallier classification system.
KW - Fat infiltration
KW - Goutallier classification
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Muscle properties
KW - Rotator cuff tear
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071740480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071740480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10334-019-00774-y
DO - 10.1007/s10334-019-00774-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 31486009
AN - SCOPUS:85071740480
SN - 0968-5243
VL - 32
SP - 607
EP - 615
JO - Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine
IS - 6
ER -