TY - JOUR
T1 - A diagnostic marker to discriminate childhood apraxia of speech from speech delay
T2 - Iii. theoretical coherence of the pause marker with speech processing deficits in childhood apraxia of speech
AU - Shriberg, Lawrence D.
AU - Strand, Edythe A.
AU - Fourakis, Marios
AU - Jakielski, Kathy J.
AU - Hall, Sheryl D.
AU - Karlsson, Heather B.
AU - Mabie, Heather L.
AU - McSweeny, Jane L.
AU - Tilkens, Christie M.
AU - Wilson, David L.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant DC000496 and by a core grant to the Waisman Center from the National Institute of Child Health and Development (Grant HD03352). Authors CT and HK made the original and substantial continuing contributions leading to the development of the PM. We are grateful to the following colleagues and collaborators for their significant contributions to this research: Len Abbeduto, Nancy Alarcon, Becky Baas, Adriane Baylis, Richard Boada, Roger Brown, Stephen Camarata, Thomas Campbell, Richard Folsom, Lisa Freebairn, Jordan Green, Barbara Lewis, Christopher Moore, Katherine Odell, Bruce Pennington, Nancy Potter, Jonathan Preston, Erin Redle, Heather Leavy Rusiewicz, Alison Scheer-Cohen, Kristie Spencer, Ruth Stoeckel, Bruce Tomblin, Jennifer Vannest, and Emily White. We also thank the many participants, parents of participants, and research colleagues who have contributed insights on needs and issues in diagnostic research in CAS.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Purpose: Previous articles in this supplement described rationale for and development of the pause marker (PM), a diagnostic marker of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), and studies supporting its validity and reliability. The present article assesses the theoretical coherence of the PM with speech processing deficits in CAS. Method: PM and other scores were obtained for 264 participants in 6 groups: CAS in idiopathic, neurogenetic, and complex neurodevelopmental disorders; adult-onset apraxia of speech (AAS) consequent to stroke and primary progressive apraxia of speech; and idiopathic speech delay. Results: Participants with CAS and AAS had significantly lower scores than typically speaking reference participants and speech delay controls on measures posited to assess representational and transcoding processes. Representational deficits differed between CAS and AAS groups, with support for both underspecified linguistic representations and memory/access deficits in CAS, but for only the latter in AAS. CAS–AAS similarities in the age–sex standardized percentages of occurrence of the most frequent type of inappropriate pauses (abrupt) and significant differences in the standardized occurrence of appropriate pauses were consistent with speech processing findings. Conclusions: Results support the hypotheses of core representational and transcoding speech processing deficits in CAS and theoretical coherence of the PM’s pause-speech elements with these deficits.
AB - Purpose: Previous articles in this supplement described rationale for and development of the pause marker (PM), a diagnostic marker of childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), and studies supporting its validity and reliability. The present article assesses the theoretical coherence of the PM with speech processing deficits in CAS. Method: PM and other scores were obtained for 264 participants in 6 groups: CAS in idiopathic, neurogenetic, and complex neurodevelopmental disorders; adult-onset apraxia of speech (AAS) consequent to stroke and primary progressive apraxia of speech; and idiopathic speech delay. Results: Participants with CAS and AAS had significantly lower scores than typically speaking reference participants and speech delay controls on measures posited to assess representational and transcoding processes. Representational deficits differed between CAS and AAS groups, with support for both underspecified linguistic representations and memory/access deficits in CAS, but for only the latter in AAS. CAS–AAS similarities in the age–sex standardized percentages of occurrence of the most frequent type of inappropriate pauses (abrupt) and significant differences in the standardized occurrence of appropriate pauses were consistent with speech processing findings. Conclusions: Results support the hypotheses of core representational and transcoding speech processing deficits in CAS and theoretical coherence of the PM’s pause-speech elements with these deficits.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017506121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017506121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0298
DO - 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0298
M3 - Article
C2 - 28384751
AN - SCOPUS:85017506121
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 60
SP - S1135-S1152
JO - Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
JF - Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
IS - 4
ER -