A cross-sectional study of learning styles among continuing medical education participants

C. Scott Collins, Sanjeev Nanda, Brian A. Palmer, Arya Mohabbat, Cathy D. Schleck, Jayawant Mandrekar, Saswati Mahapatra, Thomas J. Beckman, Christopher M. Wittich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Experiential learning has been suggested as a framework for planning continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to (1) determine participants’ learning styles at traditional CME courses and (2) explore associations between learning styles and participant characteristics. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of all participants (n = 393) at two Mayo Clinic CME courses who completed the Kolb Learning Style Inventory and provided demographic data. Results: A total of 393 participants returned 241 surveys (response rate, 61.3%). Among the 143 participants (36.4%) who supplied complete demographic and Kolb data, Kolb learning styles included diverging (45; 31.5%), assimilating (56; 39.2%), converging (8; 5.6%), and accommodating (34; 23.8%). Associations existed between learning style and gender (p = 0.02). For most men, learning styles were diverging (23 of 63; 36.5%) and assimilating (30 of 63; 47.6%); for most women, diverging (22 of 80; 27.5%), assimilating (26 of 80; 32.5%), and accommodating (26 of 80; 32.5%). Conclusions: Internal medicine and psychiatry CME participants had diverse learning styles. Female participants had more variation in their learning styles than men. Teaching techniques must vary to appeal to all learners. The experiential learning theory sequentially moves a learner from Why? to What? to How? to If? to accommodate learning styles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Teacher
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 27 2018

Fingerprint

cross-sectional study
learning
education
learning theory
psychiatry
appeal
medicine
planning
gender
Teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A cross-sectional study of learning styles among continuing medical education participants. / Collins, C. Scott; Nanda, Sanjeev; Palmer, Brian A.; Mohabbat, Arya; Schleck, Cathy D.; Mandrekar, Jayawant; Mahapatra, Saswati; Beckman, Thomas J.; Wittich, Christopher M.

In: Medical Teacher, 27.04.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, C. Scott ; Nanda, Sanjeev ; Palmer, Brian A. ; Mohabbat, Arya ; Schleck, Cathy D. ; Mandrekar, Jayawant ; Mahapatra, Saswati ; Beckman, Thomas J. ; Wittich, Christopher M. / A cross-sectional study of learning styles among continuing medical education participants. In: Medical Teacher. 2018 ; pp. 1-7.
@article{89ff2fd92bbb401a903682d5be0629ef,
title = "A cross-sectional study of learning styles among continuing medical education participants",
abstract = "Purpose: Experiential learning has been suggested as a framework for planning continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to (1) determine participants’ learning styles at traditional CME courses and (2) explore associations between learning styles and participant characteristics. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of all participants (n = 393) at two Mayo Clinic CME courses who completed the Kolb Learning Style Inventory and provided demographic data. Results: A total of 393 participants returned 241 surveys (response rate, 61.3{\%}). Among the 143 participants (36.4{\%}) who supplied complete demographic and Kolb data, Kolb learning styles included diverging (45; 31.5{\%}), assimilating (56; 39.2{\%}), converging (8; 5.6{\%}), and accommodating (34; 23.8{\%}). Associations existed between learning style and gender (p = 0.02). For most men, learning styles were diverging (23 of 63; 36.5{\%}) and assimilating (30 of 63; 47.6{\%}); for most women, diverging (22 of 80; 27.5{\%}), assimilating (26 of 80; 32.5{\%}), and accommodating (26 of 80; 32.5{\%}). Conclusions: Internal medicine and psychiatry CME participants had diverse learning styles. Female participants had more variation in their learning styles than men. Teaching techniques must vary to appeal to all learners. The experiential learning theory sequentially moves a learner from Why? to What? to How? to If? to accommodate learning styles.",
author = "Collins, {C. Scott} and Sanjeev Nanda and Palmer, {Brian A.} and Arya Mohabbat and Schleck, {Cathy D.} and Jayawant Mandrekar and Saswati Mahapatra and Beckman, {Thomas J.} and Wittich, {Christopher M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2018.1464134",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-sectional study of learning styles among continuing medical education participants

AU - Collins, C. Scott

AU - Nanda, Sanjeev

AU - Palmer, Brian A.

AU - Mohabbat, Arya

AU - Schleck, Cathy D.

AU - Mandrekar, Jayawant

AU - Mahapatra, Saswati

AU - Beckman, Thomas J.

AU - Wittich, Christopher M.

PY - 2018/4/27

Y1 - 2018/4/27

N2 - Purpose: Experiential learning has been suggested as a framework for planning continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to (1) determine participants’ learning styles at traditional CME courses and (2) explore associations between learning styles and participant characteristics. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of all participants (n = 393) at two Mayo Clinic CME courses who completed the Kolb Learning Style Inventory and provided demographic data. Results: A total of 393 participants returned 241 surveys (response rate, 61.3%). Among the 143 participants (36.4%) who supplied complete demographic and Kolb data, Kolb learning styles included diverging (45; 31.5%), assimilating (56; 39.2%), converging (8; 5.6%), and accommodating (34; 23.8%). Associations existed between learning style and gender (p = 0.02). For most men, learning styles were diverging (23 of 63; 36.5%) and assimilating (30 of 63; 47.6%); for most women, diverging (22 of 80; 27.5%), assimilating (26 of 80; 32.5%), and accommodating (26 of 80; 32.5%). Conclusions: Internal medicine and psychiatry CME participants had diverse learning styles. Female participants had more variation in their learning styles than men. Teaching techniques must vary to appeal to all learners. The experiential learning theory sequentially moves a learner from Why? to What? to How? to If? to accommodate learning styles.

AB - Purpose: Experiential learning has been suggested as a framework for planning continuing medical education (CME). We aimed to (1) determine participants’ learning styles at traditional CME courses and (2) explore associations between learning styles and participant characteristics. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of all participants (n = 393) at two Mayo Clinic CME courses who completed the Kolb Learning Style Inventory and provided demographic data. Results: A total of 393 participants returned 241 surveys (response rate, 61.3%). Among the 143 participants (36.4%) who supplied complete demographic and Kolb data, Kolb learning styles included diverging (45; 31.5%), assimilating (56; 39.2%), converging (8; 5.6%), and accommodating (34; 23.8%). Associations existed between learning style and gender (p = 0.02). For most men, learning styles were diverging (23 of 63; 36.5%) and assimilating (30 of 63; 47.6%); for most women, diverging (22 of 80; 27.5%), assimilating (26 of 80; 32.5%), and accommodating (26 of 80; 32.5%). Conclusions: Internal medicine and psychiatry CME participants had diverse learning styles. Female participants had more variation in their learning styles than men. Teaching techniques must vary to appeal to all learners. The experiential learning theory sequentially moves a learner from Why? to What? to How? to If? to accommodate learning styles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046035247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046035247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1464134

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1464134

M3 - Article

C2 - 29703093

AN - SCOPUS:85046035247

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

ER -