A comparison of fibromyalgia symptoms in patients with Healthy versus Depressive, Low and Reactive affect balance styles

Loren L. Toussaint, Ann Vincent, Samantha J. McAllister, Terry H. Oh, Afton L. Hassett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims: Affect balance reflects relative levels of negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) and includes four styles: Healthy (low NA/high PA), Depressive (high NA/low PA), Reactive (high NA/high PA) and Low (low NA/low PA). These affect balance styles may have important associations with clinical outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia. Herein, we evaluated the severity of core fibromyalgia symptom domains as described by the Outcomes Research in Rheumatology-Fibromyalgia working group in the context of the four affect balance styles. Methods: Data from 735 patients with fibromyalgia who completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Profile of Mood States, Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale, Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were included in this analysis. Results: The majority (51.8%) of patients in our sample had a Depressive affect balance sty≤ compared to patients with a Healthy affect balance style, they scored significantly worse in all fibromyalgia symptom domains including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, dyscognition, depression, anxiety, stiffness, and functional status (P= <.001 to .004). Overall, patients with a Healthy affect balance style had the lowest level of symptoms, while symptom levels of those with Reactive and Low affect balance styles were distributed in between those of the Depressive and Healthy groups. Conclusions and implications: The results of our cross-sectional study suggest that having a Healthy affect balance style is associated with better physical and psychological symptom profiles in fibromyalgia. Futures studies evaluating these associations longitudinally could provide rationale for evaluating the effect of psychological interventions on affect balance and clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-166
Number of pages6
JournalScandinavian Journal of Pain
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Fibromyalgia
Fatigue
Hordeolum
Sleep
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Pain
Equipment and Supplies
Aptitude
Rheumatology
Self Report
Appointments and Schedules
Anxiety
Cross-Sectional Studies
Depression

Keywords

  • Affect
  • Affect balance
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Fibromyalgia symptoms
  • OMERACT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A comparison of fibromyalgia symptoms in patients with Healthy versus Depressive, Low and Reactive affect balance styles. / Toussaint, Loren L.; Vincent, Ann; McAllister, Samantha J.; Oh, Terry H.; Hassett, Afton L.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2014, p. 161-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Toussaint, Loren L. ; Vincent, Ann ; McAllister, Samantha J. ; Oh, Terry H. ; Hassett, Afton L. / A comparison of fibromyalgia symptoms in patients with Healthy versus Depressive, Low and Reactive affect balance styles. In: Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 161-166.
@article{9d989a58c75b480aa9f89626fdd895bc,
title = "A comparison of fibromyalgia symptoms in patients with Healthy versus Depressive, Low and Reactive affect balance styles",
abstract = "Background and aims: Affect balance reflects relative levels of negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) and includes four styles: Healthy (low NA/high PA), Depressive (high NA/low PA), Reactive (high NA/high PA) and Low (low NA/low PA). These affect balance styles may have important associations with clinical outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia. Herein, we evaluated the severity of core fibromyalgia symptom domains as described by the Outcomes Research in Rheumatology-Fibromyalgia working group in the context of the four affect balance styles. Methods: Data from 735 patients with fibromyalgia who completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Profile of Mood States, Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale, Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were included in this analysis. Results: The majority (51.8{\%}) of patients in our sample had a Depressive affect balance sty≤ compared to patients with a Healthy affect balance style, they scored significantly worse in all fibromyalgia symptom domains including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, dyscognition, depression, anxiety, stiffness, and functional status (P= <.001 to .004). Overall, patients with a Healthy affect balance style had the lowest level of symptoms, while symptom levels of those with Reactive and Low affect balance styles were distributed in between those of the Depressive and Healthy groups. Conclusions and implications: The results of our cross-sectional study suggest that having a Healthy affect balance style is associated with better physical and psychological symptom profiles in fibromyalgia. Futures studies evaluating these associations longitudinally could provide rationale for evaluating the effect of psychological interventions on affect balance and clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia.",
keywords = "Affect, Affect balance, Fibromyalgia, Fibromyalgia symptoms, OMERACT",
author = "Toussaint, {Loren L.} and Ann Vincent and McAllister, {Samantha J.} and Oh, {Terry H.} and Hassett, {Afton L.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "161--166",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Pain",
issn = "1877-8860",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of fibromyalgia symptoms in patients with Healthy versus Depressive, Low and Reactive affect balance styles

AU - Toussaint, Loren L.

AU - Vincent, Ann

AU - McAllister, Samantha J.

AU - Oh, Terry H.

AU - Hassett, Afton L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and aims: Affect balance reflects relative levels of negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) and includes four styles: Healthy (low NA/high PA), Depressive (high NA/low PA), Reactive (high NA/high PA) and Low (low NA/low PA). These affect balance styles may have important associations with clinical outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia. Herein, we evaluated the severity of core fibromyalgia symptom domains as described by the Outcomes Research in Rheumatology-Fibromyalgia working group in the context of the four affect balance styles. Methods: Data from 735 patients with fibromyalgia who completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Profile of Mood States, Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale, Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were included in this analysis. Results: The majority (51.8%) of patients in our sample had a Depressive affect balance sty≤ compared to patients with a Healthy affect balance style, they scored significantly worse in all fibromyalgia symptom domains including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, dyscognition, depression, anxiety, stiffness, and functional status (P= <.001 to .004). Overall, patients with a Healthy affect balance style had the lowest level of symptoms, while symptom levels of those with Reactive and Low affect balance styles were distributed in between those of the Depressive and Healthy groups. Conclusions and implications: The results of our cross-sectional study suggest that having a Healthy affect balance style is associated with better physical and psychological symptom profiles in fibromyalgia. Futures studies evaluating these associations longitudinally could provide rationale for evaluating the effect of psychological interventions on affect balance and clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia.

AB - Background and aims: Affect balance reflects relative levels of negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) and includes four styles: Healthy (low NA/high PA), Depressive (high NA/low PA), Reactive (high NA/high PA) and Low (low NA/low PA). These affect balance styles may have important associations with clinical outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia. Herein, we evaluated the severity of core fibromyalgia symptom domains as described by the Outcomes Research in Rheumatology-Fibromyalgia working group in the context of the four affect balance styles. Methods: Data from 735 patients with fibromyalgia who completed the Brief Pain Inventory, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Profile of Mood States, Medical Outcomes Sleep Scale, Multiple Ability Self-Report Questionnaire, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire-Revised, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule were included in this analysis. Results: The majority (51.8%) of patients in our sample had a Depressive affect balance sty≤ compared to patients with a Healthy affect balance style, they scored significantly worse in all fibromyalgia symptom domains including pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, dyscognition, depression, anxiety, stiffness, and functional status (P= <.001 to .004). Overall, patients with a Healthy affect balance style had the lowest level of symptoms, while symptom levels of those with Reactive and Low affect balance styles were distributed in between those of the Depressive and Healthy groups. Conclusions and implications: The results of our cross-sectional study suggest that having a Healthy affect balance style is associated with better physical and psychological symptom profiles in fibromyalgia. Futures studies evaluating these associations longitudinally could provide rationale for evaluating the effect of psychological interventions on affect balance and clinical outcomes in fibromyalgia.

KW - Affect

KW - Affect balance

KW - Fibromyalgia

KW - Fibromyalgia symptoms

KW - OMERACT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904060035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904060035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.05.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904060035

VL - 5

SP - 161

EP - 166

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Pain

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Pain

SN - 1877-8860

IS - 3

ER -