Les implants mammaires texturés

Un regard plus attentif sur les débris de surface au microscope

Translated title of the contribution: Textured breast implants: A closer look at the surface debris under the microscope

Leland H. Webb, Victoria L. Aime, Annie Do, Kenneth Mossman, Raman C. Mahabir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Texturing of breast implants is done to decrease the risk of associated complications. Each manufacturer utilizes unique and at times proprietary techniques to texture the surface of their implants. Little is known about the integrity of this surface structure texturing or the propensity for the surfaces to shed particulate matter. This study aimed to determine the extent of surface particulate shedding from 3 textured implants approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which are manufactured by Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra. Methods: Control images of each of the 3 textured breast implants were obtained with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A liquid adhesive, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer was then applied to the external shell of the implants, allowed to cool, and peeled from the surface. Images of the EVA copolymer were taken with SEM to qualitatively analyze displacement of surface particulate debris. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of the implants was repeated for qualitative comparisons with the control images. Results: The peeled copolymer of the 3 implants exhibited surface shedding. Comparison of the 3 breast implants showed the shedding to be greatest for the Allergan implant. Conclusions: This study highlights the dynamic surface material properties of the 3 FDA-approved breast implants. Shedding of particulate matter from the implant surfaces can be precipitated by moderate adhesion. Our qualitative examination of SEM findings showed more debris shed from the Allergan breast implants than from the Mentor or Sientra implants.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)179-183
Number of pages5
JournalPlastic Surgery
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Breast Implants
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Mentors
Particulate Matter
United States Food and Drug Administration
Surface Properties
Adhesives

Keywords

  • Breast implant
  • Silicone shedding
  • Surface debris
  • Textured implant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Les implants mammaires texturés : Un regard plus attentif sur les débris de surface au microscope. / Webb, Leland H.; Aime, Victoria L.; Do, Annie; Mossman, Kenneth; Mahabir, Raman C.

In: Plastic Surgery, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.08.2017, p. 179-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Webb, Leland H. ; Aime, Victoria L. ; Do, Annie ; Mossman, Kenneth ; Mahabir, Raman C. / Les implants mammaires texturés : Un regard plus attentif sur les débris de surface au microscope. In: Plastic Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 179-183.
@article{e44b194a27924321b64061494660bb5d,
title = "Les implants mammaires textur{\'e}s: Un regard plus attentif sur les d{\'e}bris de surface au microscope",
abstract = "Background: Texturing of breast implants is done to decrease the risk of associated complications. Each manufacturer utilizes unique and at times proprietary techniques to texture the surface of their implants. Little is known about the integrity of this surface structure texturing or the propensity for the surfaces to shed particulate matter. This study aimed to determine the extent of surface particulate shedding from 3 textured implants approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which are manufactured by Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra. Methods: Control images of each of the 3 textured breast implants were obtained with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A liquid adhesive, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer was then applied to the external shell of the implants, allowed to cool, and peeled from the surface. Images of the EVA copolymer were taken with SEM to qualitatively analyze displacement of surface particulate debris. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of the implants was repeated for qualitative comparisons with the control images. Results: The peeled copolymer of the 3 implants exhibited surface shedding. Comparison of the 3 breast implants showed the shedding to be greatest for the Allergan implant. Conclusions: This study highlights the dynamic surface material properties of the 3 FDA-approved breast implants. Shedding of particulate matter from the implant surfaces can be precipitated by moderate adhesion. Our qualitative examination of SEM findings showed more debris shed from the Allergan breast implants than from the Mentor or Sientra implants.",
keywords = "Breast implant, Silicone shedding, Surface debris, Textured implant",
author = "Webb, {Leland H.} and Aime, {Victoria L.} and Annie Do and Kenneth Mossman and Mahabir, {Raman C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2292550317716127",
language = "French",
volume = "25",
pages = "179--183",
journal = "Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2292-5503",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Les implants mammaires texturés

T2 - Un regard plus attentif sur les débris de surface au microscope

AU - Webb, Leland H.

AU - Aime, Victoria L.

AU - Do, Annie

AU - Mossman, Kenneth

AU - Mahabir, Raman C.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Background: Texturing of breast implants is done to decrease the risk of associated complications. Each manufacturer utilizes unique and at times proprietary techniques to texture the surface of their implants. Little is known about the integrity of this surface structure texturing or the propensity for the surfaces to shed particulate matter. This study aimed to determine the extent of surface particulate shedding from 3 textured implants approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which are manufactured by Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra. Methods: Control images of each of the 3 textured breast implants were obtained with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A liquid adhesive, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer was then applied to the external shell of the implants, allowed to cool, and peeled from the surface. Images of the EVA copolymer were taken with SEM to qualitatively analyze displacement of surface particulate debris. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of the implants was repeated for qualitative comparisons with the control images. Results: The peeled copolymer of the 3 implants exhibited surface shedding. Comparison of the 3 breast implants showed the shedding to be greatest for the Allergan implant. Conclusions: This study highlights the dynamic surface material properties of the 3 FDA-approved breast implants. Shedding of particulate matter from the implant surfaces can be precipitated by moderate adhesion. Our qualitative examination of SEM findings showed more debris shed from the Allergan breast implants than from the Mentor or Sientra implants.

AB - Background: Texturing of breast implants is done to decrease the risk of associated complications. Each manufacturer utilizes unique and at times proprietary techniques to texture the surface of their implants. Little is known about the integrity of this surface structure texturing or the propensity for the surfaces to shed particulate matter. This study aimed to determine the extent of surface particulate shedding from 3 textured implants approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which are manufactured by Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra. Methods: Control images of each of the 3 textured breast implants were obtained with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A liquid adhesive, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer was then applied to the external shell of the implants, allowed to cool, and peeled from the surface. Images of the EVA copolymer were taken with SEM to qualitatively analyze displacement of surface particulate debris. Scanning electron microscopy imaging of the implants was repeated for qualitative comparisons with the control images. Results: The peeled copolymer of the 3 implants exhibited surface shedding. Comparison of the 3 breast implants showed the shedding to be greatest for the Allergan implant. Conclusions: This study highlights the dynamic surface material properties of the 3 FDA-approved breast implants. Shedding of particulate matter from the implant surfaces can be precipitated by moderate adhesion. Our qualitative examination of SEM findings showed more debris shed from the Allergan breast implants than from the Mentor or Sientra implants.

KW - Breast implant

KW - Silicone shedding

KW - Surface debris

KW - Textured implant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050933911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050933911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2292550317716127

DO - 10.1177/2292550317716127

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 179

EP - 183

JO - Plastic Surgery

JF - Plastic Surgery

SN - 2292-5503

IS - 3

ER -