Wrist arthroscopy Indications and clinical applications

M. E. Rettig, Peter C Amadio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We reviewed retrospectively a series of 128 consecutive patients who had wrist arthroscopy at our institution between January 1988 and July 1991. The aim of the procedure was to establish a diagnosis in 27 patients, to challenge a pre-operative diagnosis in 95 patients and to evaluate joint surfaces in six patients. For the 27 patients with a previously unknown diagnosis, the diagnostic sensitivity was 67% and the specificity 100%. Arthrotomy or other intervention was avoided in 18. For the 95 patients with an established pre-operative diagnosis, arthrotomy was avoided in 45: in 26 the desired procedure could be done arthroscopically, and in 19 the diagnosis, as improved by arthroscopy, was felt not to require further treatment. Procedures performed arthroscopically included débridement of triangular fibrocartilage and inter-carpal ligament tears; lysis of adhesions, and synovectomy. In six patients, arthroscopy was performed to evaluate joint surfaces after fracture reduction or before ulnar shortening osteotomy. In none of the six was arthrotomy felt necessary after arthroscopy. Wrist arthroscopy avoided the need for further surgery in 66 (52%) of our patients; arthrotomy was avoided in 69 (54%). In cases with significant carpal instability evident pre-operatively, arthroscopy was unlikely to avoid the need for open treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)774-777
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Arthroscopy
Wrist
Joints
Triangular Fibrocartilage
Fracture Fixation
Osteotomy
Ligaments
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Transplantation

Cite this

Wrist arthroscopy Indications and clinical applications. / Rettig, M. E.; Amadio, Peter C.

In: Journal of Hand Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1994, p. 774-777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4892665ff6c74df3bc0bb056a14a16f8,
title = "Wrist arthroscopy Indications and clinical applications",
abstract = "We reviewed retrospectively a series of 128 consecutive patients who had wrist arthroscopy at our institution between January 1988 and July 1991. The aim of the procedure was to establish a diagnosis in 27 patients, to challenge a pre-operative diagnosis in 95 patients and to evaluate joint surfaces in six patients. For the 27 patients with a previously unknown diagnosis, the diagnostic sensitivity was 67{\%} and the specificity 100{\%}. Arthrotomy or other intervention was avoided in 18. For the 95 patients with an established pre-operative diagnosis, arthrotomy was avoided in 45: in 26 the desired procedure could be done arthroscopically, and in 19 the diagnosis, as improved by arthroscopy, was felt not to require further treatment. Procedures performed arthroscopically included d{\'e}bridement of triangular fibrocartilage and inter-carpal ligament tears; lysis of adhesions, and synovectomy. In six patients, arthroscopy was performed to evaluate joint surfaces after fracture reduction or before ulnar shortening osteotomy. In none of the six was arthrotomy felt necessary after arthroscopy. Wrist arthroscopy avoided the need for further surgery in 66 (52{\%}) of our patients; arthrotomy was avoided in 69 (54{\%}). In cases with significant carpal instability evident pre-operatively, arthroscopy was unlikely to avoid the need for open treatment.",
author = "Rettig, {M. E.} and Amadio, {Peter C}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/0266-7681(94)90256-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "774--777",
journal = "Journal of Hand Surgery",
issn = "0266-7681",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wrist arthroscopy Indications and clinical applications

AU - Rettig, M. E.

AU - Amadio, Peter C

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - We reviewed retrospectively a series of 128 consecutive patients who had wrist arthroscopy at our institution between January 1988 and July 1991. The aim of the procedure was to establish a diagnosis in 27 patients, to challenge a pre-operative diagnosis in 95 patients and to evaluate joint surfaces in six patients. For the 27 patients with a previously unknown diagnosis, the diagnostic sensitivity was 67% and the specificity 100%. Arthrotomy or other intervention was avoided in 18. For the 95 patients with an established pre-operative diagnosis, arthrotomy was avoided in 45: in 26 the desired procedure could be done arthroscopically, and in 19 the diagnosis, as improved by arthroscopy, was felt not to require further treatment. Procedures performed arthroscopically included débridement of triangular fibrocartilage and inter-carpal ligament tears; lysis of adhesions, and synovectomy. In six patients, arthroscopy was performed to evaluate joint surfaces after fracture reduction or before ulnar shortening osteotomy. In none of the six was arthrotomy felt necessary after arthroscopy. Wrist arthroscopy avoided the need for further surgery in 66 (52%) of our patients; arthrotomy was avoided in 69 (54%). In cases with significant carpal instability evident pre-operatively, arthroscopy was unlikely to avoid the need for open treatment.

AB - We reviewed retrospectively a series of 128 consecutive patients who had wrist arthroscopy at our institution between January 1988 and July 1991. The aim of the procedure was to establish a diagnosis in 27 patients, to challenge a pre-operative diagnosis in 95 patients and to evaluate joint surfaces in six patients. For the 27 patients with a previously unknown diagnosis, the diagnostic sensitivity was 67% and the specificity 100%. Arthrotomy or other intervention was avoided in 18. For the 95 patients with an established pre-operative diagnosis, arthrotomy was avoided in 45: in 26 the desired procedure could be done arthroscopically, and in 19 the diagnosis, as improved by arthroscopy, was felt not to require further treatment. Procedures performed arthroscopically included débridement of triangular fibrocartilage and inter-carpal ligament tears; lysis of adhesions, and synovectomy. In six patients, arthroscopy was performed to evaluate joint surfaces after fracture reduction or before ulnar shortening osteotomy. In none of the six was arthrotomy felt necessary after arthroscopy. Wrist arthroscopy avoided the need for further surgery in 66 (52%) of our patients; arthrotomy was avoided in 69 (54%). In cases with significant carpal instability evident pre-operatively, arthroscopy was unlikely to avoid the need for open treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028575982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028575982&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90256-9

DO - 10.1016/0266-7681(94)90256-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 7706885

AN - SCOPUS:0028575982

VL - 19

SP - 774

EP - 777

JO - Journal of Hand Surgery

JF - Journal of Hand Surgery

SN - 0266-7681

IS - 6

ER -