Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection

Jony van Hilst, Thijs de Rooij, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Horacio J. Asbun, Jeffrey Barkun, Uggo Boggi, Olivier R. Busch, Kevin C.P. Conlon, Marcel G. Dijkgraaf, Ho Seong Han, Paul D. Hansen, Michael L. Kendrick, Andre L. Montagnini, Chinnusamy Palanivelu, Bård I. Røsok, Shailesh V. Shrikhande, Go Wakabayashi, Herbert J. Zeh, Charles M. Vollmer, David A. KoobyMarc G.H. Besselink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The introduction of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) into surgical practice has been slow. The worldwide utilization of MIPR and attitude towards future perspectives of MIPR remains unknown. Methods An anonymous survey on MIPR was sent to the members of six international associations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery. Results The survey was completed by 435 surgeons from 50 countries, with each surgeon performing a median of 22 (IQR 12–40) pancreatic resections annually. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was performed by 345 (79%) surgeons and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) by 124 (29%). The median total personal experience was 20 (IQR 10–50) MIDPs and 12 (IQR 4–40) MIPDs. Current superiority for MIDP was claimed by 304 (70%) and for MIPD by 44 (10%) surgeons. The most frequently mentioned reason for not performing MIDP (54/90 (60%)) and MIPD (193/311 (62%)) was lack of specific training. Most surgeons (394/435 (90%)) would consider participating in an international registry on MIPR. Discussion This worldwide survey showed that most participating HPB surgeons value MIPR as a useful development, especially for MIDP, but the role and implementation of MIPD requires further assessment. Most HPB surgeons would welcome specific training in MIPR and the establishment of an international registry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)190-204
Number of pages15
JournalHPB
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Pancreatectomy
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Registries
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

van Hilst, J., de Rooij, T., Abu Hilal, M., Asbun, H. J., Barkun, J., Boggi, U., ... Besselink, M. G. H. (2017). Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. HPB, 19(3), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011

Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. / van Hilst, Jony; de Rooij, Thijs; Abu Hilal, Mohammed; Asbun, Horacio J.; Barkun, Jeffrey; Boggi, Uggo; Busch, Olivier R.; Conlon, Kevin C.P.; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.; Han, Ho Seong; Hansen, Paul D.; Kendrick, Michael L.; Montagnini, Andre L.; Palanivelu, Chinnusamy; Røsok, Bård I.; Shrikhande, Shailesh V.; Wakabayashi, Go; Zeh, Herbert J.; Vollmer, Charles M.; Kooby, David A.; Besselink, Marc G.H.

In: HPB, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 190-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van Hilst, J, de Rooij, T, Abu Hilal, M, Asbun, HJ, Barkun, J, Boggi, U, Busch, OR, Conlon, KCP, Dijkgraaf, MG, Han, HS, Hansen, PD, Kendrick, ML, Montagnini, AL, Palanivelu, C, Røsok, BI, Shrikhande, SV, Wakabayashi, G, Zeh, HJ, Vollmer, CM, Kooby, DA & Besselink, MGH 2017, 'Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection', HPB, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011
van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Abu Hilal M, Asbun HJ, Barkun J, Boggi U et al. Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. HPB. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):190-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011
van Hilst, Jony ; de Rooij, Thijs ; Abu Hilal, Mohammed ; Asbun, Horacio J. ; Barkun, Jeffrey ; Boggi, Uggo ; Busch, Olivier R. ; Conlon, Kevin C.P. ; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. ; Han, Ho Seong ; Hansen, Paul D. ; Kendrick, Michael L. ; Montagnini, Andre L. ; Palanivelu, Chinnusamy ; Røsok, Bård I. ; Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ; Wakabayashi, Go ; Zeh, Herbert J. ; Vollmer, Charles M. ; Kooby, David A. ; Besselink, Marc G.H. / Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. In: HPB. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 190-204.
@article{cde67cd3156046048bb6e3b38cc99782,
title = "Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection",
abstract = "Background The introduction of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) into surgical practice has been slow. The worldwide utilization of MIPR and attitude towards future perspectives of MIPR remains unknown. Methods An anonymous survey on MIPR was sent to the members of six international associations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery. Results The survey was completed by 435 surgeons from 50 countries, with each surgeon performing a median of 22 (IQR 12–40) pancreatic resections annually. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was performed by 345 (79{\%}) surgeons and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) by 124 (29{\%}). The median total personal experience was 20 (IQR 10–50) MIDPs and 12 (IQR 4–40) MIPDs. Current superiority for MIDP was claimed by 304 (70{\%}) and for MIPD by 44 (10{\%}) surgeons. The most frequently mentioned reason for not performing MIDP (54/90 (60{\%})) and MIPD (193/311 (62{\%})) was lack of specific training. Most surgeons (394/435 (90{\%})) would consider participating in an international registry on MIPR. Discussion This worldwide survey showed that most participating HPB surgeons value MIPR as a useful development, especially for MIDP, but the role and implementation of MIPD requires further assessment. Most HPB surgeons would welcome specific training in MIPR and the establishment of an international registry.",
author = "{van Hilst}, Jony and {de Rooij}, Thijs and {Abu Hilal}, Mohammed and Asbun, {Horacio J.} and Jeffrey Barkun and Uggo Boggi and Busch, {Olivier R.} and Conlon, {Kevin C.P.} and Dijkgraaf, {Marcel G.} and Han, {Ho Seong} and Hansen, {Paul D.} and Kendrick, {Michael L.} and Montagnini, {Andre L.} and Chinnusamy Palanivelu and R{\o}sok, {B{\aa}rd I.} and Shrikhande, {Shailesh V.} and Go Wakabayashi and Zeh, {Herbert J.} and Vollmer, {Charles M.} and Kooby, {David A.} and Besselink, {Marc G.H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "190--204",
journal = "HPB",
issn = "1365-182X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection

AU - van Hilst, Jony

AU - de Rooij, Thijs

AU - Abu Hilal, Mohammed

AU - Asbun, Horacio J.

AU - Barkun, Jeffrey

AU - Boggi, Uggo

AU - Busch, Olivier R.

AU - Conlon, Kevin C.P.

AU - Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.

AU - Han, Ho Seong

AU - Hansen, Paul D.

AU - Kendrick, Michael L.

AU - Montagnini, Andre L.

AU - Palanivelu, Chinnusamy

AU - Røsok, Bård I.

AU - Shrikhande, Shailesh V.

AU - Wakabayashi, Go

AU - Zeh, Herbert J.

AU - Vollmer, Charles M.

AU - Kooby, David A.

AU - Besselink, Marc G.H.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background The introduction of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) into surgical practice has been slow. The worldwide utilization of MIPR and attitude towards future perspectives of MIPR remains unknown. Methods An anonymous survey on MIPR was sent to the members of six international associations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery. Results The survey was completed by 435 surgeons from 50 countries, with each surgeon performing a median of 22 (IQR 12–40) pancreatic resections annually. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was performed by 345 (79%) surgeons and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) by 124 (29%). The median total personal experience was 20 (IQR 10–50) MIDPs and 12 (IQR 4–40) MIPDs. Current superiority for MIDP was claimed by 304 (70%) and for MIPD by 44 (10%) surgeons. The most frequently mentioned reason for not performing MIDP (54/90 (60%)) and MIPD (193/311 (62%)) was lack of specific training. Most surgeons (394/435 (90%)) would consider participating in an international registry on MIPR. Discussion This worldwide survey showed that most participating HPB surgeons value MIPR as a useful development, especially for MIDP, but the role and implementation of MIPD requires further assessment. Most HPB surgeons would welcome specific training in MIPR and the establishment of an international registry.

AB - Background The introduction of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) into surgical practice has been slow. The worldwide utilization of MIPR and attitude towards future perspectives of MIPR remains unknown. Methods An anonymous survey on MIPR was sent to the members of six international associations of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery. Results The survey was completed by 435 surgeons from 50 countries, with each surgeon performing a median of 22 (IQR 12–40) pancreatic resections annually. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was performed by 345 (79%) surgeons and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) by 124 (29%). The median total personal experience was 20 (IQR 10–50) MIDPs and 12 (IQR 4–40) MIPDs. Current superiority for MIDP was claimed by 304 (70%) and for MIPD by 44 (10%) surgeons. The most frequently mentioned reason for not performing MIDP (54/90 (60%)) and MIPD (193/311 (62%)) was lack of specific training. Most surgeons (394/435 (90%)) would consider participating in an international registry on MIPR. Discussion This worldwide survey showed that most participating HPB surgeons value MIPR as a useful development, especially for MIDP, but the role and implementation of MIPD requires further assessment. Most HPB surgeons would welcome specific training in MIPR and the establishment of an international registry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013131077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013131077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 28215904

AN - SCOPUS:85013131077

VL - 19

SP - 190

EP - 204

JO - HPB

JF - HPB

SN - 1365-182X

IS - 3

ER -