Within-group differences between native-born and foreign-born black men on prostate cancer risk reduction and early detection practices

Folakemi T. Odedina, Getachew Dagne, Margareth Larose-Pierre, John Scrivens, Frank Emanuel, Angela Adams, Shannon Pressey, Oladapo Odedina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To better address prostate cancer disparities, we investigated the differences among US-born, African-born, and Caribbean-born Black men on prostate cancer risk reduction and early detection behaviors. Data were collected from over 3,400 Black men in five cities in Florida. One-way analysis of variance was used to explore the ethnic variations among the three study groups. We found that there were significant differences among the three groups. The US-born Black men had the highest knowledge, were most likely to have health insurance, and consume the most meat compared to African-born, and Caribbean-born Black men. African-born Black men were most likely to use chemoprevention products and discuss prostate cancer risk-reduction and early detection with a physician. Given the significant number of foreign-born Blacks in the US, it is important to disaggregate the data of US-born and foreign-born Blacks to develop effective programs and policies to address the needs of each group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)996-1004
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Black men
  • Early detection
  • Prevention
  • Prostate cancer
  • Risk reduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Within-group differences between native-born and foreign-born black men on prostate cancer risk reduction and early detection practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this