Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion

Christopher M. Burkle, Richard R Sharp, Eelco F. Wijdicks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1464-1469
Number of pages6
JournalNeurology
Volume83
Issue number16
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Confusion
Brain Death
Physicians
Apnea
Neurology
Nervous System
Consensus
Guidelines
Brain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion. / Burkle, Christopher M.; Sharp, Richard R; Wijdicks, Eelco F.

In: Neurology, Vol. 83, No. 16, 01.10.2014, p. 1464-1469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burkle, Christopher M. ; Sharp, Richard R ; Wijdicks, Eelco F. / Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion. In: Neurology. 2014 ; Vol. 83, No. 16. pp. 1464-1469.
@article{4a2783336f3049399bdf905fab4c849e,
title = "Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion",
abstract = "Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.",
author = "Burkle, {Christopher M.} and Sharp, {Richard R} and Wijdicks, {Eelco F.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000000883",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1464--1469",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "16",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion

AU - Burkle, Christopher M.

AU - Sharp, Richard R

AU - Wijdicks, Eelco F.

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.

AB - Neurologic determination of brain death is a complex assessment that may be misunderstood by nonspecialists and families. Recent guidelines clarify how to proceed with such an examination and are available to physicians, with the time of death in adults and children being determined by the last defining test-the apnea test. This core principle in neurology has been challenged recently in court and resulted in an unprecedented continuation of care in a 13-year-old child declared dead. This review comments on the medical, legal, and ethical quandaries introduced by this case and highlights the major elements of consensus on matters related to brain death that have been forged over 3 decades of sustained medical and societal debate. A clear appreciation by physicians and the public of the diagnostic determination of death following loss of brain function will help to prevent similar conflicts from occurring in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923077673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923077673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000883

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000883

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 1464

EP - 1469

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 16

ER -