What is the outcome we seek? A commentary on Keith et al. (2002)

Glenn E. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article by J. R. Keith et al. (2002) raises several issues that are frequently pertinent when neuropsychological tools are used as outcomes measures. These issues include whether the main interest is the mean change on a neuropsychological measure, the number of people who show a significant change on that measure, or both. Also at issue is whether the outcome of interest is either cognitive change or cognitive impairment. A corollary is determining when the failure to produce a practice effect is of clinical significance. Finally, it may be time to move beyond asking whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) influences neuropsychological outcome. Rather, the pertinent question may now be, under what conditions and for which people does CABG have the least neuropsychological impact?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-433
Number of pages2
JournalNeuropsychology
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Coronary Artery Bypass
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Cognitive Dysfunction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

What is the outcome we seek? A commentary on Keith et al. (2002). / Smith, Glenn E.

In: Neuropsychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2002, p. 432-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Glenn E. / What is the outcome we seek? A commentary on Keith et al. (2002). In: Neuropsychology. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 432-433.
@article{1c0700c316e04fe3a83990c338fa4b7d,
title = "What is the outcome we seek? A commentary on Keith et al. (2002)",
abstract = "The article by J. R. Keith et al. (2002) raises several issues that are frequently pertinent when neuropsychological tools are used as outcomes measures. These issues include whether the main interest is the mean change on a neuropsychological measure, the number of people who show a significant change on that measure, or both. Also at issue is whether the outcome of interest is either cognitive change or cognitive impairment. A corollary is determining when the failure to produce a practice effect is of clinical significance. Finally, it may be time to move beyond asking whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) influences neuropsychological outcome. Rather, the pertinent question may now be, under what conditions and for which people does CABG have the least neuropsychological impact?",
author = "Smith, {Glenn E.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.432",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "432--433",
journal = "Neuropsychology",
issn = "0894-4105",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the outcome we seek? A commentary on Keith et al. (2002)

AU - Smith, Glenn E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The article by J. R. Keith et al. (2002) raises several issues that are frequently pertinent when neuropsychological tools are used as outcomes measures. These issues include whether the main interest is the mean change on a neuropsychological measure, the number of people who show a significant change on that measure, or both. Also at issue is whether the outcome of interest is either cognitive change or cognitive impairment. A corollary is determining when the failure to produce a practice effect is of clinical significance. Finally, it may be time to move beyond asking whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) influences neuropsychological outcome. Rather, the pertinent question may now be, under what conditions and for which people does CABG have the least neuropsychological impact?

AB - The article by J. R. Keith et al. (2002) raises several issues that are frequently pertinent when neuropsychological tools are used as outcomes measures. These issues include whether the main interest is the mean change on a neuropsychological measure, the number of people who show a significant change on that measure, or both. Also at issue is whether the outcome of interest is either cognitive change or cognitive impairment. A corollary is determining when the failure to produce a practice effect is of clinical significance. Finally, it may be time to move beyond asking whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) influences neuropsychological outcome. Rather, the pertinent question may now be, under what conditions and for which people does CABG have the least neuropsychological impact?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035996025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035996025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.432

DO - 10.1037/0894-4105.16.3.432

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 432

EP - 433

JO - Neuropsychology

JF - Neuropsychology

SN - 0894-4105

IS - 3

ER -