What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers

Shahab Mehdizadeh, Andrew Ross, Lauren Gerson, Jonathan A Leighton, Ann Chen, Drew Schembre, Gary Chen, Carol Semrad, Ahmad Kamal, Edwyn M. Harrison, Kenneth Binmoeller, Irving Waxman, Richard Kozarek, Simon K. Lo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

233 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Performance parameters for double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have not been described. Objective: To determine the learning curve for DBE. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Six U.S. tertiary centers. Patients: A total of 188 subjects undergoing 237 DBE procedures; 130 (69%) with obscure GI bleeding. Interventions: Performance parameters from each center's initial 10 cases were compared to the subsequent examinations. Main Outcome Measurements: Exam duration, depth of insertion, and findings on DBE examination. Results: DBE was introduced by mouth in 149 (63%) cases, by rectum in 77 (33%) cases, and through a stoma in 6 (2.5%) patients. The mean (±SD) duration was 109.1 ± 44.6 minutes for the first 10 cases and 92.4 ± 37.6 minutes for subsequent cases (P = .005) but did not change for rectal DBE procedures. There was no change in mean depth of insertion, but the mean fluoroscopy time declined significantly (P = .025). Diagnostic or therapeutic maneuvers were performed in 64% of cases; DBE led to a diagnosis in 81 (43%) patients. A total of 78% of patients had prior capsule endoscopy (CE) with significant agreement between DBE and CE (κ = 0.74). One perforation occurred (0.4%). Per-rectal cases failed to reach the small bowel in 24 (31%) cases. Limitations: All patients did not undergo initial CE. The therapeutic DBE scope was not available for the initial 8 months of the study. Conclusions: There was a significant decline in overall procedural time and fluoroscopy time after the initial 10 DBE cases. There was no improvement in performance parameters when DBE was performed via the rectal approach despite increased, but limited, operator experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)740-750
Number of pages11
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Double-Balloon Enteroscopy
Learning Curve
Tertiary Care Centers
Capsule Endoscopy
Fluoroscopy
Rectum
Mouth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers. / Mehdizadeh, Shahab; Ross, Andrew; Gerson, Lauren; Leighton, Jonathan A; Chen, Ann; Schembre, Drew; Chen, Gary; Semrad, Carol; Kamal, Ahmad; Harrison, Edwyn M.; Binmoeller, Kenneth; Waxman, Irving; Kozarek, Richard; Lo, Simon K.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 64, No. 5, 11.2006, p. 740-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mehdizadeh, S, Ross, A, Gerson, L, Leighton, JA, Chen, A, Schembre, D, Chen, G, Semrad, C, Kamal, A, Harrison, EM, Binmoeller, K, Waxman, I, Kozarek, R & Lo, SK 2006, 'What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 740-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.022
Mehdizadeh, Shahab ; Ross, Andrew ; Gerson, Lauren ; Leighton, Jonathan A ; Chen, Ann ; Schembre, Drew ; Chen, Gary ; Semrad, Carol ; Kamal, Ahmad ; Harrison, Edwyn M. ; Binmoeller, Kenneth ; Waxman, Irving ; Kozarek, Richard ; Lo, Simon K. / What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2006 ; Vol. 64, No. 5. pp. 740-750.
@article{5b00b2709418402c820df0806aa16c2f,
title = "What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers",
abstract = "Background: Performance parameters for double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have not been described. Objective: To determine the learning curve for DBE. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Six U.S. tertiary centers. Patients: A total of 188 subjects undergoing 237 DBE procedures; 130 (69{\%}) with obscure GI bleeding. Interventions: Performance parameters from each center's initial 10 cases were compared to the subsequent examinations. Main Outcome Measurements: Exam duration, depth of insertion, and findings on DBE examination. Results: DBE was introduced by mouth in 149 (63{\%}) cases, by rectum in 77 (33{\%}) cases, and through a stoma in 6 (2.5{\%}) patients. The mean (±SD) duration was 109.1 ± 44.6 minutes for the first 10 cases and 92.4 ± 37.6 minutes for subsequent cases (P = .005) but did not change for rectal DBE procedures. There was no change in mean depth of insertion, but the mean fluoroscopy time declined significantly (P = .025). Diagnostic or therapeutic maneuvers were performed in 64{\%} of cases; DBE led to a diagnosis in 81 (43{\%}) patients. A total of 78{\%} of patients had prior capsule endoscopy (CE) with significant agreement between DBE and CE (κ = 0.74). One perforation occurred (0.4{\%}). Per-rectal cases failed to reach the small bowel in 24 (31{\%}) cases. Limitations: All patients did not undergo initial CE. The therapeutic DBE scope was not available for the initial 8 months of the study. Conclusions: There was a significant decline in overall procedural time and fluoroscopy time after the initial 10 DBE cases. There was no improvement in performance parameters when DBE was performed via the rectal approach despite increased, but limited, operator experience.",
author = "Shahab Mehdizadeh and Andrew Ross and Lauren Gerson and Leighton, {Jonathan A} and Ann Chen and Drew Schembre and Gary Chen and Carol Semrad and Ahmad Kamal and Harrison, {Edwyn M.} and Kenneth Binmoeller and Irving Waxman and Richard Kozarek and Lo, {Simon K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "740--750",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers

AU - Mehdizadeh, Shahab

AU - Ross, Andrew

AU - Gerson, Lauren

AU - Leighton, Jonathan A

AU - Chen, Ann

AU - Schembre, Drew

AU - Chen, Gary

AU - Semrad, Carol

AU - Kamal, Ahmad

AU - Harrison, Edwyn M.

AU - Binmoeller, Kenneth

AU - Waxman, Irving

AU - Kozarek, Richard

AU - Lo, Simon K.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Background: Performance parameters for double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have not been described. Objective: To determine the learning curve for DBE. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Six U.S. tertiary centers. Patients: A total of 188 subjects undergoing 237 DBE procedures; 130 (69%) with obscure GI bleeding. Interventions: Performance parameters from each center's initial 10 cases were compared to the subsequent examinations. Main Outcome Measurements: Exam duration, depth of insertion, and findings on DBE examination. Results: DBE was introduced by mouth in 149 (63%) cases, by rectum in 77 (33%) cases, and through a stoma in 6 (2.5%) patients. The mean (±SD) duration was 109.1 ± 44.6 minutes for the first 10 cases and 92.4 ± 37.6 minutes for subsequent cases (P = .005) but did not change for rectal DBE procedures. There was no change in mean depth of insertion, but the mean fluoroscopy time declined significantly (P = .025). Diagnostic or therapeutic maneuvers were performed in 64% of cases; DBE led to a diagnosis in 81 (43%) patients. A total of 78% of patients had prior capsule endoscopy (CE) with significant agreement between DBE and CE (κ = 0.74). One perforation occurred (0.4%). Per-rectal cases failed to reach the small bowel in 24 (31%) cases. Limitations: All patients did not undergo initial CE. The therapeutic DBE scope was not available for the initial 8 months of the study. Conclusions: There was a significant decline in overall procedural time and fluoroscopy time after the initial 10 DBE cases. There was no improvement in performance parameters when DBE was performed via the rectal approach despite increased, but limited, operator experience.

AB - Background: Performance parameters for double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have not been described. Objective: To determine the learning curve for DBE. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Six U.S. tertiary centers. Patients: A total of 188 subjects undergoing 237 DBE procedures; 130 (69%) with obscure GI bleeding. Interventions: Performance parameters from each center's initial 10 cases were compared to the subsequent examinations. Main Outcome Measurements: Exam duration, depth of insertion, and findings on DBE examination. Results: DBE was introduced by mouth in 149 (63%) cases, by rectum in 77 (33%) cases, and through a stoma in 6 (2.5%) patients. The mean (±SD) duration was 109.1 ± 44.6 minutes for the first 10 cases and 92.4 ± 37.6 minutes for subsequent cases (P = .005) but did not change for rectal DBE procedures. There was no change in mean depth of insertion, but the mean fluoroscopy time declined significantly (P = .025). Diagnostic or therapeutic maneuvers were performed in 64% of cases; DBE led to a diagnosis in 81 (43%) patients. A total of 78% of patients had prior capsule endoscopy (CE) with significant agreement between DBE and CE (κ = 0.74). One perforation occurred (0.4%). Per-rectal cases failed to reach the small bowel in 24 (31%) cases. Limitations: All patients did not undergo initial CE. The therapeutic DBE scope was not available for the initial 8 months of the study. Conclusions: There was a significant decline in overall procedural time and fluoroscopy time after the initial 10 DBE cases. There was no improvement in performance parameters when DBE was performed via the rectal approach despite increased, but limited, operator experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749999016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749999016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.022

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 17055868

AN - SCOPUS:33749999016

VL - 64

SP - 740

EP - 750

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 5

ER -