Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: A histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits

A. Rouchaud, C. Ramana, Waleed Brinjikji, Y. H. Ding, D. Dai, T. Gunderson, J. Cebral, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan D Kadirvel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robust wall apposition for flow-diverter stents may be important for endothelialization. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device, the objectives of this study were to 1) assess interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wall apposition on posttreatment DSA and evaluate its association with aneurysm occlusion, and 2) measure the relationship between wall apposition assessed with histology and aneurysm occlusion rate after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saccular aneurysms were created in 41 rabbits and treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Three investigators independently graded wall apposition on posttreatment DSA as good or poor. A histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the wall apposition on histologic samples. We examined the correlation between angiographic occlusion and wall apposition with histology and angiography. RESULTS: Wall apposition evaluated on histology was strongly associated with saccular aneurysm occlusion. Sensitivity and specificity of wall apposition to predict complete occlusion at follow-up were 76.9% and 84.0%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 81.6%. In this experimental study, DSA was suboptimal to assess flow-diverter apposition, with moderate interobserver agreement and low accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Good wall apposition is strongly associated with complete occlusion after flow-diverter therapy. In this study, DSA was suboptimal for assessing wall apposition of flow-diverter stents. These findings suggest that improved tools for assessing flow diverter- stent wall apposition are highly relevant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2087-2091
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Aneurysm
Rabbits
Stents
Histology
Equipment and Supplies
Angiography
Research Personnel
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion : A histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits. / Rouchaud, A.; Ramana, C.; Brinjikji, Waleed; Ding, Y. H.; Dai, D.; Gunderson, T.; Cebral, J.; Kallmes, David F; Kadirvel, Ramanathan D.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 37, No. 11, 01.11.2016, p. 2087-2091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63453853c1494b8a81f4b3ef8400e203,
title = "Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: A histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robust wall apposition for flow-diverter stents may be important for endothelialization. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device, the objectives of this study were to 1) assess interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wall apposition on posttreatment DSA and evaluate its association with aneurysm occlusion, and 2) measure the relationship between wall apposition assessed with histology and aneurysm occlusion rate after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saccular aneurysms were created in 41 rabbits and treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Three investigators independently graded wall apposition on posttreatment DSA as good or poor. A histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the wall apposition on histologic samples. We examined the correlation between angiographic occlusion and wall apposition with histology and angiography. RESULTS: Wall apposition evaluated on histology was strongly associated with saccular aneurysm occlusion. Sensitivity and specificity of wall apposition to predict complete occlusion at follow-up were 76.9{\%} and 84.0{\%}, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 81.6{\%}. In this experimental study, DSA was suboptimal to assess flow-diverter apposition, with moderate interobserver agreement and low accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Good wall apposition is strongly associated with complete occlusion after flow-diverter therapy. In this study, DSA was suboptimal for assessing wall apposition of flow-diverter stents. These findings suggest that improved tools for assessing flow diverter- stent wall apposition are highly relevant.",
author = "A. Rouchaud and C. Ramana and Waleed Brinjikji and Ding, {Y. H.} and D. Dai and T. Gunderson and J. Cebral and Kallmes, {David F} and Kadirvel, {Ramanathan D}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A4848",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "2087--2091",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion

T2 - A histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits

AU - Rouchaud, A.

AU - Ramana, C.

AU - Brinjikji, Waleed

AU - Ding, Y. H.

AU - Dai, D.

AU - Gunderson, T.

AU - Cebral, J.

AU - Kallmes, David F

AU - Kadirvel, Ramanathan D

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robust wall apposition for flow-diverter stents may be important for endothelialization. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device, the objectives of this study were to 1) assess interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wall apposition on posttreatment DSA and evaluate its association with aneurysm occlusion, and 2) measure the relationship between wall apposition assessed with histology and aneurysm occlusion rate after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saccular aneurysms were created in 41 rabbits and treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Three investigators independently graded wall apposition on posttreatment DSA as good or poor. A histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the wall apposition on histologic samples. We examined the correlation between angiographic occlusion and wall apposition with histology and angiography. RESULTS: Wall apposition evaluated on histology was strongly associated with saccular aneurysm occlusion. Sensitivity and specificity of wall apposition to predict complete occlusion at follow-up were 76.9% and 84.0%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 81.6%. In this experimental study, DSA was suboptimal to assess flow-diverter apposition, with moderate interobserver agreement and low accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Good wall apposition is strongly associated with complete occlusion after flow-diverter therapy. In this study, DSA was suboptimal for assessing wall apposition of flow-diverter stents. These findings suggest that improved tools for assessing flow diverter- stent wall apposition are highly relevant.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robust wall apposition for flow-diverter stents may be important for endothelialization. Using a large series of experimental aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device, the objectives of this study were to 1) assess interobserver agreement for the evaluation of wall apposition on posttreatment DSA and evaluate its association with aneurysm occlusion, and 2) measure the relationship between wall apposition assessed with histology and aneurysm occlusion rate after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Saccular aneurysms were created in 41 rabbits and treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. DSA was performed just after the deployment of the device and at follow-up. Three investigators independently graded wall apposition on posttreatment DSA as good or poor. A histopathologist blinded to the angiographic results graded the wall apposition on histologic samples. We examined the correlation between angiographic occlusion and wall apposition with histology and angiography. RESULTS: Wall apposition evaluated on histology was strongly associated with saccular aneurysm occlusion. Sensitivity and specificity of wall apposition to predict complete occlusion at follow-up were 76.9% and 84.0%, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 81.6%. In this experimental study, DSA was suboptimal to assess flow-diverter apposition, with moderate interobserver agreement and low accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Good wall apposition is strongly associated with complete occlusion after flow-diverter therapy. In this study, DSA was suboptimal for assessing wall apposition of flow-diverter stents. These findings suggest that improved tools for assessing flow diverter- stent wall apposition are highly relevant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995654389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995654389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4848

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4848

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995654389

VL - 37

SP - 2087

EP - 2091

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 11

ER -