Vitrification versus slow freezing of human ovarian tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological outcomes

Supriya Behl, Vidhu B. Joshi, Nicholas B. Larson, Maia C. Young, Muhammad Bilal, David L. Walker, Zaraq Khan, Candace F. Granberg, Asma Chattha, Yulian Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of pertinent literature published from 2006 to January 2022 were conducted to study and compare vitrification and slow freezing, the two prominent methods of ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The primary outcome measures for this study were (1) proportion of intact primordial follicles, (2) proportion of intact stromal cells, (3) proportion of DNA fragmentation in primordial follicles, and (4) mean primordial follicle density. This meta-analysis of 19 studies revealed a significantly greater proportion of intact stromal cells in vitrified tissue versus slow-frozen tissue. No significant differences upon pooled analyses were observed between the two cryopreservation methods with respect to the proportion of intact primordial follicles, proportion of DNA fragmentation, or mean primordial follicle density. Due to differences seen in stromal cell viability, vitrification may be a preferred option to preserve histology of tissue. However, more work should be done to compare the two freezing techniques with less heterogeneity caused by patients, samples, and protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)455-464
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Fertility preservation
  • Ovarian tissue cryopreservation
  • Slow freezing
  • Vitrification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Genetics
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vitrification versus slow freezing of human ovarian tissue: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this