Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill

Emily Hinchcliff, Isabel Green, Christopher Destephano, Mary Cox, Douglas Smink, Amanika Kumar, Erik Hokenstad, Joan Bengtson, Sarah L. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether visuospatial perception (VSP) testing is correlated to simulated or intraoperative surgical performance as rated by the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. Design: (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Two academic training institutions. Participants: Forty-one residents, including 19 from Brigham and Women's Hospital and 22 from the Mayo Clinic, from 3 different specialties: obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and urology. Intervention: Participants underwent 3 different tests: visuospatial perception testing (VSP), Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) peg transfer, and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer. Surgical grading from the ACGME milestones tool was obtained for each participant. Demographic and background information was also collected, including specialty, year of training, previous experience with simulated skills, and surgical interest. Standard statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, and correlations were determined using adjusted linear regression models. Measurements and Main Results: In univariate analysis, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Mayo Clinic training programs differed in times and overall scores for both the FLS peg transfer and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer tests (p <.05 for all). In addition, type of residency training affected time and overall score on the robotic peg transfer test. Familiarity with tasks correlated with higher score and faster task completion (p =.05 for all except VSP score). There were no differences in VSP scores by program, specialty, or year of training. In adjusted linear regression modeling, VSP testing was correlated only to robotic peg transfer skills (average time, p =.006; overall score, p =.001). Milestones did not correlate to either VSP or surgical simulation testing. Conclusion: VSP score was correlated with robotic simulation skills, but not with FLS skills or ACGME milestones. This suggests that the ability of VSP score to predict competence differs between tasks. Therefore, further investigation of aptitude testing is needed, especially before its integration as an entry examination into a surgical subspecialty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1044-1050
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Robotics
Graduate Medical Education
Laparoscopy
Linear Models
Urology
Advisory Committees
Internship and Residency
Gynecology
Mental Competency
Obstetrics
Transfer (Psychology)
Teaching
Demography
Students
Education

Keywords

  • Simulation
  • Surgical aptitude
  • Visuospatial test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill. / Hinchcliff, Emily; Green, Isabel; Destephano, Christopher; Cox, Mary; Smink, Douglas; Kumar, Amanika; Hokenstad, Erik; Bengtson, Joan; Cohen, Sarah L.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 01.09.2018, p. 1044-1050.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hinchcliff, E, Green, I, Destephano, C, Cox, M, Smink, D, Kumar, A, Hokenstad, E, Bengtson, J & Cohen, SL 2018, 'Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill', Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1044-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.031
Hinchcliff, Emily ; Green, Isabel ; Destephano, Christopher ; Cox, Mary ; Smink, Douglas ; Kumar, Amanika ; Hokenstad, Erik ; Bengtson, Joan ; Cohen, Sarah L. / Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill. In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 1044-1050.
@article{70195c360cf44bf898e7495f8f117c36,
title = "Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether visuospatial perception (VSP) testing is correlated to simulated or intraoperative surgical performance as rated by the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. Design: (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Two academic training institutions. Participants: Forty-one residents, including 19 from Brigham and Women's Hospital and 22 from the Mayo Clinic, from 3 different specialties: obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and urology. Intervention: Participants underwent 3 different tests: visuospatial perception testing (VSP), Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) peg transfer, and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer. Surgical grading from the ACGME milestones tool was obtained for each participant. Demographic and background information was also collected, including specialty, year of training, previous experience with simulated skills, and surgical interest. Standard statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, and correlations were determined using adjusted linear regression models. Measurements and Main Results: In univariate analysis, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Mayo Clinic training programs differed in times and overall scores for both the FLS peg transfer and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer tests (p <.05 for all). In addition, type of residency training affected time and overall score on the robotic peg transfer test. Familiarity with tasks correlated with higher score and faster task completion (p =.05 for all except VSP score). There were no differences in VSP scores by program, specialty, or year of training. In adjusted linear regression modeling, VSP testing was correlated only to robotic peg transfer skills (average time, p =.006; overall score, p =.001). Milestones did not correlate to either VSP or surgical simulation testing. Conclusion: VSP score was correlated with robotic simulation skills, but not with FLS skills or ACGME milestones. This suggests that the ability of VSP score to predict competence differs between tasks. Therefore, further investigation of aptitude testing is needed, especially before its integration as an entry examination into a surgical subspecialty.",
keywords = "Simulation, Surgical aptitude, Visuospatial test",
author = "Emily Hinchcliff and Isabel Green and Christopher Destephano and Mary Cox and Douglas Smink and Amanika Kumar and Erik Hokenstad and Joan Bengtson and Cohen, {Sarah L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "1044--1050",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visuospatial Aptitude Testing Differentially Predicts Simulated Surgical Skill

AU - Hinchcliff, Emily

AU - Green, Isabel

AU - Destephano, Christopher

AU - Cox, Mary

AU - Smink, Douglas

AU - Kumar, Amanika

AU - Hokenstad, Erik

AU - Bengtson, Joan

AU - Cohen, Sarah L.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether visuospatial perception (VSP) testing is correlated to simulated or intraoperative surgical performance as rated by the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. Design: (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Two academic training institutions. Participants: Forty-one residents, including 19 from Brigham and Women's Hospital and 22 from the Mayo Clinic, from 3 different specialties: obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and urology. Intervention: Participants underwent 3 different tests: visuospatial perception testing (VSP), Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) peg transfer, and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer. Surgical grading from the ACGME milestones tool was obtained for each participant. Demographic and background information was also collected, including specialty, year of training, previous experience with simulated skills, and surgical interest. Standard statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, and correlations were determined using adjusted linear regression models. Measurements and Main Results: In univariate analysis, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Mayo Clinic training programs differed in times and overall scores for both the FLS peg transfer and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer tests (p <.05 for all). In addition, type of residency training affected time and overall score on the robotic peg transfer test. Familiarity with tasks correlated with higher score and faster task completion (p =.05 for all except VSP score). There were no differences in VSP scores by program, specialty, or year of training. In adjusted linear regression modeling, VSP testing was correlated only to robotic peg transfer skills (average time, p =.006; overall score, p =.001). Milestones did not correlate to either VSP or surgical simulation testing. Conclusion: VSP score was correlated with robotic simulation skills, but not with FLS skills or ACGME milestones. This suggests that the ability of VSP score to predict competence differs between tasks. Therefore, further investigation of aptitude testing is needed, especially before its integration as an entry examination into a surgical subspecialty.

AB - Objective: To determine whether visuospatial perception (VSP) testing is correlated to simulated or intraoperative surgical performance as rated by the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones. Design: (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Two academic training institutions. Participants: Forty-one residents, including 19 from Brigham and Women's Hospital and 22 from the Mayo Clinic, from 3 different specialties: obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, and urology. Intervention: Participants underwent 3 different tests: visuospatial perception testing (VSP), Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) peg transfer, and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer. Surgical grading from the ACGME milestones tool was obtained for each participant. Demographic and background information was also collected, including specialty, year of training, previous experience with simulated skills, and surgical interest. Standard statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test, and correlations were determined using adjusted linear regression models. Measurements and Main Results: In univariate analysis, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Mayo Clinic training programs differed in times and overall scores for both the FLS peg transfer and da Vinci robotic simulation peg transfer tests (p <.05 for all). In addition, type of residency training affected time and overall score on the robotic peg transfer test. Familiarity with tasks correlated with higher score and faster task completion (p =.05 for all except VSP score). There were no differences in VSP scores by program, specialty, or year of training. In adjusted linear regression modeling, VSP testing was correlated only to robotic peg transfer skills (average time, p =.006; overall score, p =.001). Milestones did not correlate to either VSP or surgical simulation testing. Conclusion: VSP score was correlated with robotic simulation skills, but not with FLS skills or ACGME milestones. This suggests that the ability of VSP score to predict competence differs between tasks. Therefore, further investigation of aptitude testing is needed, especially before its integration as an entry examination into a surgical subspecialty.

KW - Simulation

KW - Surgical aptitude

KW - Visuospatial test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049355852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049355852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.031

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1044

EP - 1050

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

IS - 6

ER -