Visuospatial and technical ability in the selection and assessment of higher surgical trainees in the London deanery

Patrick Tansley, Sanjeev Kakar, S. Withey, P. Butler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite awareness of the limitations of current selection and competency assessments, there is little consensus and alternatives have not been readily accepted. Essential surgical skills include visuospatial and technical ability. The aim of this study was to survey current methods of higher surgical trainee selection and assessment. We suggest ways to improve the process. Nine surgical training programmes in the London deanery were surveyed through questionnaires to programme directors, existing trainees and examination of deanery publications. Testing of visuospatial and technical ability was piloted at selection only in a single general surgical department. Practical skills were assessed in 3/9 (33%) specialties (ENT, plastic and general surgery). Once selected, no specialty tested visuospatial and technical ability. Practical skills were tested in only 1/9 (11%) specialties (plastic surgery). The remaining 8/9 (89%) were 'assessed' by interview. Lack of visuospatial and technical ability assessment was identified at selection and during higher surgical training. Airlines have long recognised early identification of these qualities as critical for efficient training. There is a need for more objective methods in this area prior to selection as time to assess surgical trainees during long apprenticeships is no longer available. We advocate a suitably validated competency-based model during and at completion of training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)591-595
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Plastic Surgery
Publications
Interviews
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Competence
  • Training
  • Visuospatial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Visuospatial and technical ability in the selection and assessment of higher surgical trainees in the London deanery. / Tansley, Patrick; Kakar, Sanjeev; Withey, S.; Butler, P.

In: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 89, No. 6, 09.2007, p. 591-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f19321e8436c4bbb83757aae6ca6ac50,
title = "Visuospatial and technical ability in the selection and assessment of higher surgical trainees in the London deanery",
abstract = "Despite awareness of the limitations of current selection and competency assessments, there is little consensus and alternatives have not been readily accepted. Essential surgical skills include visuospatial and technical ability. The aim of this study was to survey current methods of higher surgical trainee selection and assessment. We suggest ways to improve the process. Nine surgical training programmes in the London deanery were surveyed through questionnaires to programme directors, existing trainees and examination of deanery publications. Testing of visuospatial and technical ability was piloted at selection only in a single general surgical department. Practical skills were assessed in 3/9 (33{\%}) specialties (ENT, plastic and general surgery). Once selected, no specialty tested visuospatial and technical ability. Practical skills were tested in only 1/9 (11{\%}) specialties (plastic surgery). The remaining 8/9 (89{\%}) were 'assessed' by interview. Lack of visuospatial and technical ability assessment was identified at selection and during higher surgical training. Airlines have long recognised early identification of these qualities as critical for efficient training. There is a need for more objective methods in this area prior to selection as time to assess surgical trainees during long apprenticeships is no longer available. We advocate a suitably validated competency-based model during and at completion of training.",
keywords = "Assessment, Competence, Training, Visuospatial",
author = "Patrick Tansley and Sanjeev Kakar and S. Withey and P. Butler",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1308/003588407X187702",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "591--595",
journal = "Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England",
issn = "0035-8843",
publisher = "Royal College of Surgeons of England",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visuospatial and technical ability in the selection and assessment of higher surgical trainees in the London deanery

AU - Tansley, Patrick

AU - Kakar, Sanjeev

AU - Withey, S.

AU - Butler, P.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Despite awareness of the limitations of current selection and competency assessments, there is little consensus and alternatives have not been readily accepted. Essential surgical skills include visuospatial and technical ability. The aim of this study was to survey current methods of higher surgical trainee selection and assessment. We suggest ways to improve the process. Nine surgical training programmes in the London deanery were surveyed through questionnaires to programme directors, existing trainees and examination of deanery publications. Testing of visuospatial and technical ability was piloted at selection only in a single general surgical department. Practical skills were assessed in 3/9 (33%) specialties (ENT, plastic and general surgery). Once selected, no specialty tested visuospatial and technical ability. Practical skills were tested in only 1/9 (11%) specialties (plastic surgery). The remaining 8/9 (89%) were 'assessed' by interview. Lack of visuospatial and technical ability assessment was identified at selection and during higher surgical training. Airlines have long recognised early identification of these qualities as critical for efficient training. There is a need for more objective methods in this area prior to selection as time to assess surgical trainees during long apprenticeships is no longer available. We advocate a suitably validated competency-based model during and at completion of training.

AB - Despite awareness of the limitations of current selection and competency assessments, there is little consensus and alternatives have not been readily accepted. Essential surgical skills include visuospatial and technical ability. The aim of this study was to survey current methods of higher surgical trainee selection and assessment. We suggest ways to improve the process. Nine surgical training programmes in the London deanery were surveyed through questionnaires to programme directors, existing trainees and examination of deanery publications. Testing of visuospatial and technical ability was piloted at selection only in a single general surgical department. Practical skills were assessed in 3/9 (33%) specialties (ENT, plastic and general surgery). Once selected, no specialty tested visuospatial and technical ability. Practical skills were tested in only 1/9 (11%) specialties (plastic surgery). The remaining 8/9 (89%) were 'assessed' by interview. Lack of visuospatial and technical ability assessment was identified at selection and during higher surgical training. Airlines have long recognised early identification of these qualities as critical for efficient training. There is a need for more objective methods in this area prior to selection as time to assess surgical trainees during long apprenticeships is no longer available. We advocate a suitably validated competency-based model during and at completion of training.

KW - Assessment

KW - Competence

KW - Training

KW - Visuospatial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548652669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548652669&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1308/003588407X187702

DO - 10.1308/003588407X187702

M3 - Article

C2 - 18201473

AN - SCOPUS:34548652669

VL - 89

SP - 591

EP - 595

JO - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

JF - Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

SN - 0035-8843

IS - 6

ER -