Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering

Elizabeth G. McFarland, James A. Brink, John Loh, Ge Wang, Vincent Argiro, Dennis M. Balfe, Jay Heiken, Michael W. Vannier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate two key processing steps for detection of colon polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colography with perspective volume rendering (PVR): image reconstruction and opacity assignment of the attenuation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 10 patients with known polyps confirmed at colonoscopy, and detailed quantitative analyses were performed of data obtained in four. First, anatomic fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) images generated from two- dimensional (2D) source images with equal voxel dimensions (87%-90% overlap) was compared with 3D images generated from 2D source images with unequal voxel dimensions (0%-80% overlap). Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated for various opacity threshold settings. Then, step and sigmoidal opacity functions were compared with respect to image smoothness and edge sharpness. RESULTS: PVR images generated after interpolation of image data reconstructed with at least 60% overlap were equivalent in image quality to PVR images generated from source images with equal voxel dimensions. Relative polyp-to-haustral fold dimensions demonstrated substantial distortions with opacity thresholds below -700 HU. The 3D PVR images generated with the sigmoidal opacity function were significantly smoother than those generated with the step opacity function (paired t test, P < .02), with small differences noted in edge sharpness. CONCLUSION: Use of highly overlapping source images (87%-90%) was not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps. Image artifacts were suppressed with use of an appropriate opacity threshold and a sigmoidal opacity function without substantial loss in edge sharpness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-707
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume205
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Polyps
Computer-Assisted Image Processing
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Colonoscopy
Artifacts
Colon

Keywords

  • Colon, CT
  • Colon, neoplasms
  • Computed tomography (CT), image processing
  • Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional
  • Images, analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

McFarland, E. G., Brink, J. A., Loh, J., Wang, G., Argiro, V., Balfe, D. M., ... Vannier, M. W. (1997). Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. Radiology, 205(3), 701-707. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393524

Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography : Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. / McFarland, Elizabeth G.; Brink, James A.; Loh, John; Wang, Ge; Argiro, Vincent; Balfe, Dennis M.; Heiken, Jay; Vannier, Michael W.

In: Radiology, Vol. 205, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 701-707.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McFarland, Elizabeth G. ; Brink, James A. ; Loh, John ; Wang, Ge ; Argiro, Vincent ; Balfe, Dennis M. ; Heiken, Jay ; Vannier, Michael W. / Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography : Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering. In: Radiology. 1997 ; Vol. 205, No. 3. pp. 701-707.
@article{a1ce2892fcd84728a413a369d3393822,
title = "Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography: Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate two key processing steps for detection of colon polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colography with perspective volume rendering (PVR): image reconstruction and opacity assignment of the attenuation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 10 patients with known polyps confirmed at colonoscopy, and detailed quantitative analyses were performed of data obtained in four. First, anatomic fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) images generated from two- dimensional (2D) source images with equal voxel dimensions (87{\%}-90{\%} overlap) was compared with 3D images generated from 2D source images with unequal voxel dimensions (0{\%}-80{\%} overlap). Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated for various opacity threshold settings. Then, step and sigmoidal opacity functions were compared with respect to image smoothness and edge sharpness. RESULTS: PVR images generated after interpolation of image data reconstructed with at least 60{\%} overlap were equivalent in image quality to PVR images generated from source images with equal voxel dimensions. Relative polyp-to-haustral fold dimensions demonstrated substantial distortions with opacity thresholds below -700 HU. The 3D PVR images generated with the sigmoidal opacity function were significantly smoother than those generated with the step opacity function (paired t test, P < .02), with small differences noted in edge sharpness. CONCLUSION: Use of highly overlapping source images (87{\%}-90{\%}) was not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps. Image artifacts were suppressed with use of an appropriate opacity threshold and a sigmoidal opacity function without substantial loss in edge sharpness.",
keywords = "Colon, CT, Colon, neoplasms, Computed tomography (CT), image processing, Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional, Images, analysis",
author = "McFarland, {Elizabeth G.} and Brink, {James A.} and John Loh and Ge Wang and Vincent Argiro and Balfe, {Dennis M.} and Jay Heiken and Vannier, {Michael W.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "205",
pages = "701--707",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visualization of colorectal polyps with spiral CT colography

T2 - Evaluation of processing parameters with perspective volume rendering

AU - McFarland, Elizabeth G.

AU - Brink, James A.

AU - Loh, John

AU - Wang, Ge

AU - Argiro, Vincent

AU - Balfe, Dennis M.

AU - Heiken, Jay

AU - Vannier, Michael W.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate two key processing steps for detection of colon polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colography with perspective volume rendering (PVR): image reconstruction and opacity assignment of the attenuation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 10 patients with known polyps confirmed at colonoscopy, and detailed quantitative analyses were performed of data obtained in four. First, anatomic fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) images generated from two- dimensional (2D) source images with equal voxel dimensions (87%-90% overlap) was compared with 3D images generated from 2D source images with unequal voxel dimensions (0%-80% overlap). Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated for various opacity threshold settings. Then, step and sigmoidal opacity functions were compared with respect to image smoothness and edge sharpness. RESULTS: PVR images generated after interpolation of image data reconstructed with at least 60% overlap were equivalent in image quality to PVR images generated from source images with equal voxel dimensions. Relative polyp-to-haustral fold dimensions demonstrated substantial distortions with opacity thresholds below -700 HU. The 3D PVR images generated with the sigmoidal opacity function were significantly smoother than those generated with the step opacity function (paired t test, P < .02), with small differences noted in edge sharpness. CONCLUSION: Use of highly overlapping source images (87%-90%) was not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps. Image artifacts were suppressed with use of an appropriate opacity threshold and a sigmoidal opacity function without substantial loss in edge sharpness.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate two key processing steps for detection of colon polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colography with perspective volume rendering (PVR): image reconstruction and opacity assignment of the attenuation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spiral CT was performed in 10 patients with known polyps confirmed at colonoscopy, and detailed quantitative analyses were performed of data obtained in four. First, anatomic fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) images generated from two- dimensional (2D) source images with equal voxel dimensions (87%-90% overlap) was compared with 3D images generated from 2D source images with unequal voxel dimensions (0%-80% overlap). Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated for various opacity threshold settings. Then, step and sigmoidal opacity functions were compared with respect to image smoothness and edge sharpness. RESULTS: PVR images generated after interpolation of image data reconstructed with at least 60% overlap were equivalent in image quality to PVR images generated from source images with equal voxel dimensions. Relative polyp-to-haustral fold dimensions demonstrated substantial distortions with opacity thresholds below -700 HU. The 3D PVR images generated with the sigmoidal opacity function were significantly smoother than those generated with the step opacity function (paired t test, P < .02), with small differences noted in edge sharpness. CONCLUSION: Use of highly overlapping source images (87%-90%) was not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps. Image artifacts were suppressed with use of an appropriate opacity threshold and a sigmoidal opacity function without substantial loss in edge sharpness.

KW - Colon, CT

KW - Colon, neoplasms

KW - Computed tomography (CT), image processing

KW - Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional

KW - Images, analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030695827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030695827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393524

DO - 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393524

M3 - Article

C2 - 9393524

AN - SCOPUS:0030695827

VL - 205

SP - 701

EP - 707

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -