Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion

Andrew Utter, Meredith L. Anderson, Joseph G. Cunniff, Kenton R Kaufman, Elena J. Jelsing, Todd A. Patrick, Dixon J. Magnuson, Timothy Maus, Michael J Yaszemski, Jeffery R. Basford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Fluoroscopic assessment of the effects of commercially available spinal orthotics on lumbar vertebral motion as subjects performed flexion and extension maneuvers. Objective. To quantitate the effects of 3 commonly available, off-the-shelf, soft, and semirigid spinal orthoses on lumbar spinal motion. Summary of Background Data. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthoses are widely prescribed for patients with low back pain and, at times, following surgery. Despite this use, surprisingly little is known about the magnitude of their effects on lumbar vertebral motion. Methods. Ten subjects (6 men and 4 women) with an average age of 27.0 ± 5.3 years, underwent videofluoroscopic imaging as they performed a full flexion/extension cycle. Assessments, during which the subjects were unbraced or wearing either a soft lumbrosacral orthosis (LSO), a semirigid LSO, or a semirigid thoracolumbrosacral orthosis (TLSO) were performed in random order. Images were obtained at a rate of 3.75 Hz and digitally processed to determine the sagittal rotation of the L3-L5 vertebral bodies. Results. Each of the braces produced a statistically significant reduction in overall lumbar motion during the flexion maneuver (P = 0.007) but none had a detectable effect during extension. Relative effectiveness varied by vertebral level. At the L3-L4 level, only the TLSO had a statistically significant effect on intervertebral flexion movement (32%, P = 0.003). At the L4-L5 level all the orthoses were effective (and statistically indistinguishable) in their ability to reduce intervertebral flexion movements ranging from 48% for the semirigid TLSO to about 15% to 20% for the 2 LSOs. No effects were noted for any of the orthoses at the L5-S1 level. Conclusion. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthotics can have significant effects on lumbar vertebral body motion at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSpine
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - May 20 2010

Fingerprint

Orthotic Devices
Braces
Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Brace
  • LSO
  • Orthotics
  • Spinal motion
  • Spine
  • TLSO
  • Videofluoroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion. / Utter, Andrew; Anderson, Meredith L.; Cunniff, Joseph G.; Kaufman, Kenton R; Jelsing, Elena J.; Patrick, Todd A.; Magnuson, Dixon J.; Maus, Timothy; Yaszemski, Michael J; Basford, Jeffery R.

In: Spine, Vol. 35, No. 12, 20.05.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Utter, Andrew ; Anderson, Meredith L. ; Cunniff, Joseph G. ; Kaufman, Kenton R ; Jelsing, Elena J. ; Patrick, Todd A. ; Magnuson, Dixon J. ; Maus, Timothy ; Yaszemski, Michael J ; Basford, Jeffery R. / Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion. In: Spine. 2010 ; Vol. 35, No. 12.
@article{787624d3823b42e4990df9e91832459f,
title = "Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion",
abstract = "Study Design. Fluoroscopic assessment of the effects of commercially available spinal orthotics on lumbar vertebral motion as subjects performed flexion and extension maneuvers. Objective. To quantitate the effects of 3 commonly available, off-the-shelf, soft, and semirigid spinal orthoses on lumbar spinal motion. Summary of Background Data. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthoses are widely prescribed for patients with low back pain and, at times, following surgery. Despite this use, surprisingly little is known about the magnitude of their effects on lumbar vertebral motion. Methods. Ten subjects (6 men and 4 women) with an average age of 27.0 ± 5.3 years, underwent videofluoroscopic imaging as they performed a full flexion/extension cycle. Assessments, during which the subjects were unbraced or wearing either a soft lumbrosacral orthosis (LSO), a semirigid LSO, or a semirigid thoracolumbrosacral orthosis (TLSO) were performed in random order. Images were obtained at a rate of 3.75 Hz and digitally processed to determine the sagittal rotation of the L3-L5 vertebral bodies. Results. Each of the braces produced a statistically significant reduction in overall lumbar motion during the flexion maneuver (P = 0.007) but none had a detectable effect during extension. Relative effectiveness varied by vertebral level. At the L3-L4 level, only the TLSO had a statistically significant effect on intervertebral flexion movement (32{\%}, P = 0.003). At the L4-L5 level all the orthoses were effective (and statistically indistinguishable) in their ability to reduce intervertebral flexion movements ranging from 48{\%} for the semirigid TLSO to about 15{\%} to 20{\%} for the 2 LSOs. No effects were noted for any of the orthoses at the L5-S1 level. Conclusion. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthotics can have significant effects on lumbar vertebral body motion at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels.",
keywords = "Brace, LSO, Orthotics, Spinal motion, Spine, TLSO, Videofluoroscopy",
author = "Andrew Utter and Anderson, {Meredith L.} and Cunniff, {Joseph G.} and Kaufman, {Kenton R} and Jelsing, {Elena J.} and Patrick, {Todd A.} and Magnuson, {Dixon J.} and Timothy Maus and Yaszemski, {Michael J} and Basford, {Jeffery R.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c62fa1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video fluoroscopic analysis of the effects of three commonly-prescribed off-the-shelf orthoses on vertebral motion

AU - Utter, Andrew

AU - Anderson, Meredith L.

AU - Cunniff, Joseph G.

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

AU - Jelsing, Elena J.

AU - Patrick, Todd A.

AU - Magnuson, Dixon J.

AU - Maus, Timothy

AU - Yaszemski, Michael J

AU - Basford, Jeffery R.

PY - 2010/5/20

Y1 - 2010/5/20

N2 - Study Design. Fluoroscopic assessment of the effects of commercially available spinal orthotics on lumbar vertebral motion as subjects performed flexion and extension maneuvers. Objective. To quantitate the effects of 3 commonly available, off-the-shelf, soft, and semirigid spinal orthoses on lumbar spinal motion. Summary of Background Data. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthoses are widely prescribed for patients with low back pain and, at times, following surgery. Despite this use, surprisingly little is known about the magnitude of their effects on lumbar vertebral motion. Methods. Ten subjects (6 men and 4 women) with an average age of 27.0 ± 5.3 years, underwent videofluoroscopic imaging as they performed a full flexion/extension cycle. Assessments, during which the subjects were unbraced or wearing either a soft lumbrosacral orthosis (LSO), a semirigid LSO, or a semirigid thoracolumbrosacral orthosis (TLSO) were performed in random order. Images were obtained at a rate of 3.75 Hz and digitally processed to determine the sagittal rotation of the L3-L5 vertebral bodies. Results. Each of the braces produced a statistically significant reduction in overall lumbar motion during the flexion maneuver (P = 0.007) but none had a detectable effect during extension. Relative effectiveness varied by vertebral level. At the L3-L4 level, only the TLSO had a statistically significant effect on intervertebral flexion movement (32%, P = 0.003). At the L4-L5 level all the orthoses were effective (and statistically indistinguishable) in their ability to reduce intervertebral flexion movements ranging from 48% for the semirigid TLSO to about 15% to 20% for the 2 LSOs. No effects were noted for any of the orthoses at the L5-S1 level. Conclusion. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthotics can have significant effects on lumbar vertebral body motion at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels.

AB - Study Design. Fluoroscopic assessment of the effects of commercially available spinal orthotics on lumbar vertebral motion as subjects performed flexion and extension maneuvers. Objective. To quantitate the effects of 3 commonly available, off-the-shelf, soft, and semirigid spinal orthoses on lumbar spinal motion. Summary of Background Data. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthoses are widely prescribed for patients with low back pain and, at times, following surgery. Despite this use, surprisingly little is known about the magnitude of their effects on lumbar vertebral motion. Methods. Ten subjects (6 men and 4 women) with an average age of 27.0 ± 5.3 years, underwent videofluoroscopic imaging as they performed a full flexion/extension cycle. Assessments, during which the subjects were unbraced or wearing either a soft lumbrosacral orthosis (LSO), a semirigid LSO, or a semirigid thoracolumbrosacral orthosis (TLSO) were performed in random order. Images were obtained at a rate of 3.75 Hz and digitally processed to determine the sagittal rotation of the L3-L5 vertebral bodies. Results. Each of the braces produced a statistically significant reduction in overall lumbar motion during the flexion maneuver (P = 0.007) but none had a detectable effect during extension. Relative effectiveness varied by vertebral level. At the L3-L4 level, only the TLSO had a statistically significant effect on intervertebral flexion movement (32%, P = 0.003). At the L4-L5 level all the orthoses were effective (and statistically indistinguishable) in their ability to reduce intervertebral flexion movements ranging from 48% for the semirigid TLSO to about 15% to 20% for the 2 LSOs. No effects were noted for any of the orthoses at the L5-S1 level. Conclusion. Commercially available soft and semirigid orthotics can have significant effects on lumbar vertebral body motion at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels.

KW - Brace

KW - LSO

KW - Orthotics

KW - Spinal motion

KW - Spine

KW - TLSO

KW - Videofluoroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953027684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953027684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c62fa1

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c62fa1

M3 - Article

C2 - 20445478

AN - SCOPUS:77953027684

VL - 35

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 12

ER -