Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections

Terrence L. Trentman, David M. Rosenfeld, David P. Seamans, Joseph G. Hentz, James P. Stanek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To document the per patient rate of vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. Background: Anecdotal observations at our institution suggested that vasovagal reactions are much more common during cervical epidural steroid injections than lumbar injections, and more frequent than previously reported. Methods: Records of 249 patients undergoing their first cervical epidural steroid injection were reviewed for vasovagal reactions and other adverse events. For comparison, a first lumbar epidural steroid injection performed by the same staff physician was matched to each cervical procedure and reviewed for complications. Results: The incidence of vasovagal reaction was 7 points more common (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.12) in the cervical group (8%) than in the lumbar group (1%). This correlates to an additional vasovagal reaction for every 14 patients who were treated with cervical injection in comparison with those treated with lumbar injection. Discussion: The risk of vasovagal reaction is significantly higher for cervical translaminar epidural steroid injections than for lumbar injections. The risk of vasovagal reaction remained higher for cervical injection even when adjusting for differences between the two populations. The higher rate of cervical vasovagal reactions may result from a combination of anxiety, the prone position with neck flexed, head drapes, and stimulus from a neck procedure. Conclusion: Increased vigilance for patients undergoing translaminar cervical epidural steroid injections may be warranted. Clinicians may choose to consider these results when counseling patients regarding risk and the need for conscious sedation during the procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-64
Number of pages6
JournalPain Practice
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Epidural Injections
Steroids
Injections
Neck
Conscious Sedation
Prone Position
Counseling
Anxiety
Head
Confidence Intervals
Physicians
Incidence
Population

Keywords

  • Cervical spine
  • Complication
  • Epidural steroid
  • Interlaminar
  • Vasovagal reaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. / Trentman, Terrence L.; Rosenfeld, David M.; Seamans, David P.; Hentz, Joseph G.; Stanek, James P.

In: Pain Practice, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2009, p. 59-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trentman, Terrence L. ; Rosenfeld, David M. ; Seamans, David P. ; Hentz, Joseph G. ; Stanek, James P. / Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. In: Pain Practice. 2009 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 59-64.
@article{558753e51459456b9a5fa79f88c4f173,
title = "Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections",
abstract = "Objective: To document the per patient rate of vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. Background: Anecdotal observations at our institution suggested that vasovagal reactions are much more common during cervical epidural steroid injections than lumbar injections, and more frequent than previously reported. Methods: Records of 249 patients undergoing their first cervical epidural steroid injection were reviewed for vasovagal reactions and other adverse events. For comparison, a first lumbar epidural steroid injection performed by the same staff physician was matched to each cervical procedure and reviewed for complications. Results: The incidence of vasovagal reaction was 7 points more common (P < 0.001, 95{\%} confidence interval 0.04-0.12) in the cervical group (8{\%}) than in the lumbar group (1{\%}). This correlates to an additional vasovagal reaction for every 14 patients who were treated with cervical injection in comparison with those treated with lumbar injection. Discussion: The risk of vasovagal reaction is significantly higher for cervical translaminar epidural steroid injections than for lumbar injections. The risk of vasovagal reaction remained higher for cervical injection even when adjusting for differences between the two populations. The higher rate of cervical vasovagal reactions may result from a combination of anxiety, the prone position with neck flexed, head drapes, and stimulus from a neck procedure. Conclusion: Increased vigilance for patients undergoing translaminar cervical epidural steroid injections may be warranted. Clinicians may choose to consider these results when counseling patients regarding risk and the need for conscious sedation during the procedure.",
keywords = "Cervical spine, Complication, Epidural steroid, Interlaminar, Vasovagal reaction",
author = "Trentman, {Terrence L.} and Rosenfeld, {David M.} and Seamans, {David P.} and Hentz, {Joseph G.} and Stanek, {James P.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00242.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "59--64",
journal = "Pain Practice",
issn = "1530-7085",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections

AU - Trentman, Terrence L.

AU - Rosenfeld, David M.

AU - Seamans, David P.

AU - Hentz, Joseph G.

AU - Stanek, James P.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objective: To document the per patient rate of vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. Background: Anecdotal observations at our institution suggested that vasovagal reactions are much more common during cervical epidural steroid injections than lumbar injections, and more frequent than previously reported. Methods: Records of 249 patients undergoing their first cervical epidural steroid injection were reviewed for vasovagal reactions and other adverse events. For comparison, a first lumbar epidural steroid injection performed by the same staff physician was matched to each cervical procedure and reviewed for complications. Results: The incidence of vasovagal reaction was 7 points more common (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.12) in the cervical group (8%) than in the lumbar group (1%). This correlates to an additional vasovagal reaction for every 14 patients who were treated with cervical injection in comparison with those treated with lumbar injection. Discussion: The risk of vasovagal reaction is significantly higher for cervical translaminar epidural steroid injections than for lumbar injections. The risk of vasovagal reaction remained higher for cervical injection even when adjusting for differences between the two populations. The higher rate of cervical vasovagal reactions may result from a combination of anxiety, the prone position with neck flexed, head drapes, and stimulus from a neck procedure. Conclusion: Increased vigilance for patients undergoing translaminar cervical epidural steroid injections may be warranted. Clinicians may choose to consider these results when counseling patients regarding risk and the need for conscious sedation during the procedure.

AB - Objective: To document the per patient rate of vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections. Background: Anecdotal observations at our institution suggested that vasovagal reactions are much more common during cervical epidural steroid injections than lumbar injections, and more frequent than previously reported. Methods: Records of 249 patients undergoing their first cervical epidural steroid injection were reviewed for vasovagal reactions and other adverse events. For comparison, a first lumbar epidural steroid injection performed by the same staff physician was matched to each cervical procedure and reviewed for complications. Results: The incidence of vasovagal reaction was 7 points more common (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.12) in the cervical group (8%) than in the lumbar group (1%). This correlates to an additional vasovagal reaction for every 14 patients who were treated with cervical injection in comparison with those treated with lumbar injection. Discussion: The risk of vasovagal reaction is significantly higher for cervical translaminar epidural steroid injections than for lumbar injections. The risk of vasovagal reaction remained higher for cervical injection even when adjusting for differences between the two populations. The higher rate of cervical vasovagal reactions may result from a combination of anxiety, the prone position with neck flexed, head drapes, and stimulus from a neck procedure. Conclusion: Increased vigilance for patients undergoing translaminar cervical epidural steroid injections may be warranted. Clinicians may choose to consider these results when counseling patients regarding risk and the need for conscious sedation during the procedure.

KW - Cervical spine

KW - Complication

KW - Epidural steroid

KW - Interlaminar

KW - Vasovagal reaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249129548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58249129548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00242.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00242.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19019051

AN - SCOPUS:58249129548

VL - 9

SP - 59

EP - 64

JO - Pain Practice

JF - Pain Practice

SN - 1530-7085

IS - 1

ER -