Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day: a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices

Lindsey M. Philpot, Bushra A. Khokhar, Jordan K. Rosedahl, Tiffany A. Sinclair, Rajeev Chaudhry, Jon O. Ebbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction with healthcare is associated with clinical outcomes, provider satisfaction, and success of healthcare organizations. As the clinic day progresses, provider fatigue, deterioration with communication within the care team, and appointment spillover may decrease patient experience. Objective: To understand the relationship between likelihood to recommend a primary care practice and scheduled appointment time across multiple practice settings. Design: Retrospective cohort. Participants: A retrospective cohort was created of all patients seen within four primary care practices between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. Main Measures: We looked at scheduled appointment time against patient likelihood to recommend a practice as a measure of overall patient experience collected routinely for clinical practice improvement by the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey®. Adjusted mixed effects logistic regression models were created to understand the relationship between progressing appointment time on patient likelihood to recommend a practice. We constructed locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) curves to understand how reported patient experience varied over the clinic day. Results: We had a response rate of 14.0% (n = 3172), 80.2% of whom indicated they would recommend our practice to others. Appointment time scheduling during the last hour (4:00–4:59 PM) had a 45% lower odds of recommending our practice when compared to the first clinic hour (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35–0.86) which is similar when controlling for patient-reported wait time (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.95). LOESS plots demonstrated declining satisfaction with subsequent appointment times compared with the first session hour, with no effect just after the lunch hour break. Conclusions: In primary care, appointment time of day is associated with patient-reported experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Appointments and Schedules
Logistic Models
Delivery of Health Care
Lunch
Patient Satisfaction
Fatigue
Communication

Keywords

  • appointment time
  • care team communication
  • patient experience
  • primary care
  • surveys
  • teamwork

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day : a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices. / Philpot, Lindsey M.; Khokhar, Bushra A.; Rosedahl, Jordan K.; Sinclair, Tiffany A.; Chaudhry, Rajeev; Ebbert, Jon O.

In: Journal of general internal medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Philpot, Lindsey M. ; Khokhar, Bushra A. ; Rosedahl, Jordan K. ; Sinclair, Tiffany A. ; Chaudhry, Rajeev ; Ebbert, Jon O. / Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day : a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices. In: Journal of general internal medicine. 2019.
@article{980bfe08d9bf4d5384a041631fd95d98,
title = "Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day: a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices",
abstract = "Background: Patient satisfaction with healthcare is associated with clinical outcomes, provider satisfaction, and success of healthcare organizations. As the clinic day progresses, provider fatigue, deterioration with communication within the care team, and appointment spillover may decrease patient experience. Objective: To understand the relationship between likelihood to recommend a primary care practice and scheduled appointment time across multiple practice settings. Design: Retrospective cohort. Participants: A retrospective cohort was created of all patients seen within four primary care practices between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. Main Measures: We looked at scheduled appointment time against patient likelihood to recommend a practice as a measure of overall patient experience collected routinely for clinical practice improvement by the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey{\circledR}. Adjusted mixed effects logistic regression models were created to understand the relationship between progressing appointment time on patient likelihood to recommend a practice. We constructed locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) curves to understand how reported patient experience varied over the clinic day. Results: We had a response rate of 14.0{\%} (n = 3172), 80.2{\%} of whom indicated they would recommend our practice to others. Appointment time scheduling during the last hour (4:00–4:59 PM) had a 45{\%} lower odds of recommending our practice when compared to the first clinic hour (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95{\%} CI 0.35–0.86) which is similar when controlling for patient-reported wait time (aOR = 0.59, 95{\%} CI 0.37–0.95). LOESS plots demonstrated declining satisfaction with subsequent appointment times compared with the first session hour, with no effect just after the lunch hour break. Conclusions: In primary care, appointment time of day is associated with patient-reported experience.",
keywords = "appointment time, care team communication, patient experience, primary care, surveys, teamwork",
author = "Philpot, {Lindsey M.} and Khokhar, {Bushra A.} and Rosedahl, {Jordan K.} and Sinclair, {Tiffany A.} and Rajeev Chaudhry and Ebbert, {Jon O.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-019-05336-5",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in Patient Experience Across the Clinic Day

T2 - a Multilevel Assessment of Four Primary Care Practices

AU - Philpot, Lindsey M.

AU - Khokhar, Bushra A.

AU - Rosedahl, Jordan K.

AU - Sinclair, Tiffany A.

AU - Chaudhry, Rajeev

AU - Ebbert, Jon O.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Patient satisfaction with healthcare is associated with clinical outcomes, provider satisfaction, and success of healthcare organizations. As the clinic day progresses, provider fatigue, deterioration with communication within the care team, and appointment spillover may decrease patient experience. Objective: To understand the relationship between likelihood to recommend a primary care practice and scheduled appointment time across multiple practice settings. Design: Retrospective cohort. Participants: A retrospective cohort was created of all patients seen within four primary care practices between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. Main Measures: We looked at scheduled appointment time against patient likelihood to recommend a practice as a measure of overall patient experience collected routinely for clinical practice improvement by the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey®. Adjusted mixed effects logistic regression models were created to understand the relationship between progressing appointment time on patient likelihood to recommend a practice. We constructed locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) curves to understand how reported patient experience varied over the clinic day. Results: We had a response rate of 14.0% (n = 3172), 80.2% of whom indicated they would recommend our practice to others. Appointment time scheduling during the last hour (4:00–4:59 PM) had a 45% lower odds of recommending our practice when compared to the first clinic hour (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35–0.86) which is similar when controlling for patient-reported wait time (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.95). LOESS plots demonstrated declining satisfaction with subsequent appointment times compared with the first session hour, with no effect just after the lunch hour break. Conclusions: In primary care, appointment time of day is associated with patient-reported experience.

AB - Background: Patient satisfaction with healthcare is associated with clinical outcomes, provider satisfaction, and success of healthcare organizations. As the clinic day progresses, provider fatigue, deterioration with communication within the care team, and appointment spillover may decrease patient experience. Objective: To understand the relationship between likelihood to recommend a primary care practice and scheduled appointment time across multiple practice settings. Design: Retrospective cohort. Participants: A retrospective cohort was created of all patients seen within four primary care practices between July 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017. Main Measures: We looked at scheduled appointment time against patient likelihood to recommend a practice as a measure of overall patient experience collected routinely for clinical practice improvement by the Press Ganey Medical Practice Survey®. Adjusted mixed effects logistic regression models were created to understand the relationship between progressing appointment time on patient likelihood to recommend a practice. We constructed locally weighted smoothing (LOESS) curves to understand how reported patient experience varied over the clinic day. Results: We had a response rate of 14.0% (n = 3172), 80.2% of whom indicated they would recommend our practice to others. Appointment time scheduling during the last hour (4:00–4:59 PM) had a 45% lower odds of recommending our practice when compared to the first clinic hour (adjusted OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.35–0.86) which is similar when controlling for patient-reported wait time (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.95). LOESS plots demonstrated declining satisfaction with subsequent appointment times compared with the first session hour, with no effect just after the lunch hour break. Conclusions: In primary care, appointment time of day is associated with patient-reported experience.

KW - appointment time

KW - care team communication

KW - patient experience

KW - primary care

KW - surveys

KW - teamwork

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073929777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073929777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-019-05336-5

DO - 10.1007/s11606-019-05336-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 31520229

AN - SCOPUS:85073929777

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -