Variability in Fluoroscopic X-Ray Exposure in Contemporary Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories

Warren K. Laskey, Merrill Wondrow, David Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to assess fluoroscopic exposure rates in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL). Background: Increasing attention is being focused on X-ray exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Methods: We measured fluoroscopic exposure rates (R/min) in 41 systems using a standardized methodology (National Electrical Manufacturers Association XR21 phantom). Measurements were obtained at 2 different phantom thicknesses to simulate varying patient body habitus. Results: Fluoroscopic exposure rates under medium (median 3.0 R/min, interquartile range 1.4 R/min) and large (median 12.5 R/min, interquartile range 4.8 R/min) habitus conditions showed substantial variation. Fluoroscopic exposure was associated with simulated patient habitus, X-ray system type, vendor, and geographic region. Under medium habitus conditions, only 25% of systems operated within a zone of lower than average exposure rates and satisfactory image quality; this frequency diminished to 7% under large habitus conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial variation (4- to 6-fold) in fluoroscopic exposure rates. This variation was not consistently associated with improved image quality. In the absence of a predictable benefit of higher (or lower) than average exposure rates, CCL quality improvement programs must minimize such potentially harmful variability in X-ray exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1361-1364
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume48
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 3 2006

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
X-Rays
Quality Improvement
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Variability in Fluoroscopic X-Ray Exposure in Contemporary Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories. / Laskey, Warren K.; Wondrow, Merrill; Holmes, David.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 48, No. 7, 03.10.2006, p. 1361-1364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d58d8436b4441a79340df1f15dc255e,
title = "Variability in Fluoroscopic X-Ray Exposure in Contemporary Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories",
abstract = "Objectives: This study sought to assess fluoroscopic exposure rates in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL). Background: Increasing attention is being focused on X-ray exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Methods: We measured fluoroscopic exposure rates (R/min) in 41 systems using a standardized methodology (National Electrical Manufacturers Association XR21 phantom). Measurements were obtained at 2 different phantom thicknesses to simulate varying patient body habitus. Results: Fluoroscopic exposure rates under medium (median 3.0 R/min, interquartile range 1.4 R/min) and large (median 12.5 R/min, interquartile range 4.8 R/min) habitus conditions showed substantial variation. Fluoroscopic exposure was associated with simulated patient habitus, X-ray system type, vendor, and geographic region. Under medium habitus conditions, only 25{\%} of systems operated within a zone of lower than average exposure rates and satisfactory image quality; this frequency diminished to 7{\%} under large habitus conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial variation (4- to 6-fold) in fluoroscopic exposure rates. This variation was not consistently associated with improved image quality. In the absence of a predictable benefit of higher (or lower) than average exposure rates, CCL quality improvement programs must minimize such potentially harmful variability in X-ray exposure.",
author = "Laskey, {Warren K.} and Merrill Wondrow and David Holmes",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1361--1364",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in Fluoroscopic X-Ray Exposure in Contemporary Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories

AU - Laskey, Warren K.

AU - Wondrow, Merrill

AU - Holmes, David

PY - 2006/10/3

Y1 - 2006/10/3

N2 - Objectives: This study sought to assess fluoroscopic exposure rates in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL). Background: Increasing attention is being focused on X-ray exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Methods: We measured fluoroscopic exposure rates (R/min) in 41 systems using a standardized methodology (National Electrical Manufacturers Association XR21 phantom). Measurements were obtained at 2 different phantom thicknesses to simulate varying patient body habitus. Results: Fluoroscopic exposure rates under medium (median 3.0 R/min, interquartile range 1.4 R/min) and large (median 12.5 R/min, interquartile range 4.8 R/min) habitus conditions showed substantial variation. Fluoroscopic exposure was associated with simulated patient habitus, X-ray system type, vendor, and geographic region. Under medium habitus conditions, only 25% of systems operated within a zone of lower than average exposure rates and satisfactory image quality; this frequency diminished to 7% under large habitus conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial variation (4- to 6-fold) in fluoroscopic exposure rates. This variation was not consistently associated with improved image quality. In the absence of a predictable benefit of higher (or lower) than average exposure rates, CCL quality improvement programs must minimize such potentially harmful variability in X-ray exposure.

AB - Objectives: This study sought to assess fluoroscopic exposure rates in contemporary cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL). Background: Increasing attention is being focused on X-ray exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Methods: We measured fluoroscopic exposure rates (R/min) in 41 systems using a standardized methodology (National Electrical Manufacturers Association XR21 phantom). Measurements were obtained at 2 different phantom thicknesses to simulate varying patient body habitus. Results: Fluoroscopic exposure rates under medium (median 3.0 R/min, interquartile range 1.4 R/min) and large (median 12.5 R/min, interquartile range 4.8 R/min) habitus conditions showed substantial variation. Fluoroscopic exposure was associated with simulated patient habitus, X-ray system type, vendor, and geographic region. Under medium habitus conditions, only 25% of systems operated within a zone of lower than average exposure rates and satisfactory image quality; this frequency diminished to 7% under large habitus conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is substantial variation (4- to 6-fold) in fluoroscopic exposure rates. This variation was not consistently associated with improved image quality. In the absence of a predictable benefit of higher (or lower) than average exposure rates, CCL quality improvement programs must minimize such potentially harmful variability in X-ray exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749035715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749035715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.051

M3 - Article

C2 - 17010795

AN - SCOPUS:33749035715

VL - 48

SP - 1361

EP - 1364

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 7

ER -