Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg: Hemodynamic outcome

Joseph L. Blackshear, Fletcher A Jr. Miller, Hassan Loutfi, Sanford J. Finck, Harold E. Snyder, Richard C. Agnew, Thomas A. Orszulak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and aims of the study: No prior studies have defined pre- versus postoperative hemodynamics of large numbers of patients with low mean transvalvular gradients. This was our objective. Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of preoperative and postoperative echo/Doppler data in 294 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Some 136 patients had a preoperative mean gradient of <50 mmHg. The relationship of preoperative to pre- minus postoperative (Δ) mean gradient (GRAD), peak valvular velocity (V2), left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V1), V1/V2ratio, V-V1, and aortic valve area (AVA) were plotted and analyzed such that a'zero-benefit threshold' from surgery could be estimated. Results: Strong relationships (r >0.80) were noted for GRAD to ΔGRAD, V2 to ΔV2, and (V2-V1) to Δ(V2-V1) with zero-benefit thresholds of 16 mmHg for GRAD, 2.6 m/s for V2 and 1.7 m/s for V2-V1. These thresholds were lower in patients who received homografts (11 mmHg, 2.2 m/s, and 1.1 m/s respectively), p<0.02. The relationship of pre operative V1/V2 to ΔV1/V2, and AVA-ΔAVA were weaker (r = 0.52 and 0.33 respectively) with zero-benefit thresholds of 0.41 and 2.0 cm2. Among patients with depressed preoperative fractional shortening, improvement was confined to those without coexistent coronary artery disease. Conclusion: This analysis of thresholds of mean gradient benefit suggests that most patients with low gradient AS improve hemodynamically from AVR. The hemodynamic 'break-even' point averages a mean gradient of 16 mmHg.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-655
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Heart Valve Disease
Volume5
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1996

Fingerprint

Aortic Valve Stenosis
Hemodynamics
Aortic Valve
Allografts
Coronary Artery Disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Blackshear, J. L., Miller, F. A. J., Loutfi, H., Finck, S. J., Snyder, H. E., Agnew, R. C., & Orszulak, T. A. (1996). Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg: Hemodynamic outcome. Journal of Heart Valve Disease, 5(6), 647-655.

Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg : Hemodynamic outcome. / Blackshear, Joseph L.; Miller, Fletcher A Jr.; Loutfi, Hassan; Finck, Sanford J.; Snyder, Harold E.; Agnew, Richard C.; Orszulak, Thomas A.

In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease, Vol. 5, No. 6, 11.1996, p. 647-655.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blackshear, JL, Miller, FAJ, Loutfi, H, Finck, SJ, Snyder, HE, Agnew, RC & Orszulak, TA 1996, 'Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg: Hemodynamic outcome', Journal of Heart Valve Disease, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 647-655.
Blackshear, Joseph L. ; Miller, Fletcher A Jr. ; Loutfi, Hassan ; Finck, Sanford J. ; Snyder, Harold E. ; Agnew, Richard C. ; Orszulak, Thomas A. / Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg : Hemodynamic outcome. In: Journal of Heart Valve Disease. 1996 ; Vol. 5, No. 6. pp. 647-655.
@article{bbfc3013f0f44aa78e5c10c79cc15589,
title = "Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg: Hemodynamic outcome",
abstract = "Background and aims of the study: No prior studies have defined pre- versus postoperative hemodynamics of large numbers of patients with low mean transvalvular gradients. This was our objective. Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of preoperative and postoperative echo/Doppler data in 294 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Some 136 patients had a preoperative mean gradient of <50 mmHg. The relationship of preoperative to pre- minus postoperative (Δ) mean gradient (GRAD), peak valvular velocity (V2), left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V1), V1/V2ratio, V-V1, and aortic valve area (AVA) were plotted and analyzed such that a'zero-benefit threshold' from surgery could be estimated. Results: Strong relationships (r >0.80) were noted for GRAD to ΔGRAD, V2 to ΔV2, and (V2-V1) to Δ(V2-V1) with zero-benefit thresholds of 16 mmHg for GRAD, 2.6 m/s for V2 and 1.7 m/s for V2-V1. These thresholds were lower in patients who received homografts (11 mmHg, 2.2 m/s, and 1.1 m/s respectively), p<0.02. The relationship of pre operative V1/V2 to ΔV1/V2, and AVA-ΔAVA were weaker (r = 0.52 and 0.33 respectively) with zero-benefit thresholds of 0.41 and 2.0 cm2. Among patients with depressed preoperative fractional shortening, improvement was confined to those without coexistent coronary artery disease. Conclusion: This analysis of thresholds of mean gradient benefit suggests that most patients with low gradient AS improve hemodynamically from AVR. The hemodynamic 'break-even' point averages a mean gradient of 16 mmHg.",
author = "Blackshear, {Joseph L.} and Miller, {Fletcher A Jr.} and Hassan Loutfi and Finck, {Sanford J.} and Snyder, {Harold E.} and Agnew, {Richard C.} and Orszulak, {Thomas A.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "647--655",
journal = "Journal of Heart Valve Disease",
issn = "0966-8519",
publisher = "ICR Publishers Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valve replacement in aortic stenosis with preoperative mean gradient <50 mmHg

T2 - Hemodynamic outcome

AU - Blackshear, Joseph L.

AU - Miller, Fletcher A Jr.

AU - Loutfi, Hassan

AU - Finck, Sanford J.

AU - Snyder, Harold E.

AU - Agnew, Richard C.

AU - Orszulak, Thomas A.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - Background and aims of the study: No prior studies have defined pre- versus postoperative hemodynamics of large numbers of patients with low mean transvalvular gradients. This was our objective. Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of preoperative and postoperative echo/Doppler data in 294 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Some 136 patients had a preoperative mean gradient of <50 mmHg. The relationship of preoperative to pre- minus postoperative (Δ) mean gradient (GRAD), peak valvular velocity (V2), left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V1), V1/V2ratio, V-V1, and aortic valve area (AVA) were plotted and analyzed such that a'zero-benefit threshold' from surgery could be estimated. Results: Strong relationships (r >0.80) were noted for GRAD to ΔGRAD, V2 to ΔV2, and (V2-V1) to Δ(V2-V1) with zero-benefit thresholds of 16 mmHg for GRAD, 2.6 m/s for V2 and 1.7 m/s for V2-V1. These thresholds were lower in patients who received homografts (11 mmHg, 2.2 m/s, and 1.1 m/s respectively), p<0.02. The relationship of pre operative V1/V2 to ΔV1/V2, and AVA-ΔAVA were weaker (r = 0.52 and 0.33 respectively) with zero-benefit thresholds of 0.41 and 2.0 cm2. Among patients with depressed preoperative fractional shortening, improvement was confined to those without coexistent coronary artery disease. Conclusion: This analysis of thresholds of mean gradient benefit suggests that most patients with low gradient AS improve hemodynamically from AVR. The hemodynamic 'break-even' point averages a mean gradient of 16 mmHg.

AB - Background and aims of the study: No prior studies have defined pre- versus postoperative hemodynamics of large numbers of patients with low mean transvalvular gradients. This was our objective. Methods: Retrospective analysis was undertaken of preoperative and postoperative echo/Doppler data in 294 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Some 136 patients had a preoperative mean gradient of <50 mmHg. The relationship of preoperative to pre- minus postoperative (Δ) mean gradient (GRAD), peak valvular velocity (V2), left ventricular outflow tract velocity (V1), V1/V2ratio, V-V1, and aortic valve area (AVA) were plotted and analyzed such that a'zero-benefit threshold' from surgery could be estimated. Results: Strong relationships (r >0.80) were noted for GRAD to ΔGRAD, V2 to ΔV2, and (V2-V1) to Δ(V2-V1) with zero-benefit thresholds of 16 mmHg for GRAD, 2.6 m/s for V2 and 1.7 m/s for V2-V1. These thresholds were lower in patients who received homografts (11 mmHg, 2.2 m/s, and 1.1 m/s respectively), p<0.02. The relationship of pre operative V1/V2 to ΔV1/V2, and AVA-ΔAVA were weaker (r = 0.52 and 0.33 respectively) with zero-benefit thresholds of 0.41 and 2.0 cm2. Among patients with depressed preoperative fractional shortening, improvement was confined to those without coexistent coronary artery disease. Conclusion: This analysis of thresholds of mean gradient benefit suggests that most patients with low gradient AS improve hemodynamically from AVR. The hemodynamic 'break-even' point averages a mean gradient of 16 mmHg.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029851751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029851751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8953443

AN - SCOPUS:0029851751

VL - 5

SP - 647

EP - 655

JO - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

JF - Journal of Heart Valve Disease

SN - 0966-8519

IS - 6

ER -